|
Work by Jim Davies
January 17, 2008 The
great walk-out from government work, culminating in 2027, was the reason
it evaporated. Nobody had lifted a hand or a shotgun against it, nobody
had voted it out, and few had even withheld tax payments until a year or
two prior--it merely disappeared with a whimper when nobody showed up to
the office. This was a truly elegant implementation of de la Boëtie's
five-century-old advice to "withdraw support" from the Colossus.
It succeeded completely--at Federal, State and local levels--and will
never be needed again, except in every other country in the world,
whose populations are busy re-educating themselves now, in preparation for
exactly similar revolutions there, and have their governments trembling in
their jackboots. The
walk-out began before 2010, but in the nature of exponential growth there
was little or no tangible, noticeable bite to the process until about 2022.
After then it gathered pace fast and by 2025 panic began to set in among
the ruling class. Hey, what good is it to write laws and issue orders when
nobody is there to enforce and implement them? Then by E-Day
in 2027, it was all over. Every member of the entire population had each
taken back his own life and those employed by him had told the tyrant,
"Take this job and shove it"--and in The
first thing everyone learned in the Academy about work is that absent
government force, one's services are worth what an employer volunteers to
pay for them; neither more nor less. So
as E-Day approached, some were eager and ready to find new ways to present
their skills to the marketplace and earn more, while others knew that they
were overpaid (because government force had excluded potential rivals) and
so anticipated a reduction accompanied by those priceless assets, a clear
conscience and high self-respect. All, of course, knew that what we
earned, we would keep--for there is no longer any tax. Nor is there any
work wasted trying to arrange one's affairs so as to minimize taxes, nor
time lost in the creative preparation of tax returns. The value of that
lost time amounted to around 14,000 tons of gold in 2023; now, it's all
applied to the productive economy. That
much is well enough known, and well celebrated. I write today about what's
been happening in the three years since, in the matter of work--of how
people earn a living in the new, free society. The
first fact of life at work is that unemployment is zero. Nobody who
wants a job has been unable to find one, after the usual period of search
and negotiation; for as in every true free market, there is always
a price at which goods and services clear. No minimum wage law prevents an
unskilled black teenager, for example, placing his foot on the first rung
of the ladder of success, as they did during the previous 60 years; so
there are no longer gangs of aimless, resentful youths roaming the streets
looking for trouble. Crime--or, rather, aggression, since
"crime" was just a government word meaning the breaking of a
law, of which none any longer exist--has accordingly dropped like a rock.
Further: in a very few more years there will no longer be any unskilled
teenagers, of any race; for all of them will have been properly educated. That
doesn't say everyone at work is satisfied--but dissatisfaction with
earnings provides the mainspring for self-improvement and skill
enhancement so that each can climb that success ladder, offering his
sharpened skills where they will exchange for higher prices. This motive
power was of course what drove the uniquely successful American economy of
the 1700s and 1800s, when government restrictions on enterprise were
relatively few. Now that we have kicked back into high gear--indeed,
overdrive--I'm anticipating a resumption in that explosion of wealth
creation, and it has already begun. The
next characteristic of work in our free society is that there has been a
very high rate of change of jobs. That followed necessarily from
the great walkout; millions of people were employed directly by government
and many millions more, indirectly--something like half the population in
total. More than three million left the military and schooling segments,
for example; and it's been wonderful to see how the new labor market has
swiftly absorbed them all, exactly as theory predicted. Less
job-changing has been needed for indirect government workers--those
employed by contractors--because the owners of those firms almost always
anticipated the coming changes and re-tooled to produce things that real
people might wish to buy--a nice case of beating swords into plowshares,
in the case of "defense" contractors. Accordingly, many of those
companies were able to re-hire those who had quit, or dissuade those about
to quit. Nonetheless, the overall change rate has been huge, and that has
triggered the emergence of successful job brokers and the very healthy
growth of existing ones like the venerable monster.com
and naturally, a large majority of the job-hunting and -finding was
done prior to the actual walk-out. There
have been a few who refused to face the reality of human nature and the
inevitability of government collapse, and so who never did quit. These
were always people at the top of the heap, mostly politicians who wouldn't
understand Adam Smith if they fell face-first into a large-type copy of
the Wealth of Nations. Most of these Neanderthals have gone to
Mexico, though a few were smart enough to exchange their paper for gold
before the former became totally worthless, and so are able to live here
on what remains of their loot, and I did hear a rumor that the President
had become a receptionist in the White House Museum--but it wasn't so. She
fled the country and I don't know where she's hiding, nor care. Work
in the newly-free -
market-based activity that has been in place for a long time -
replacement of those government services that were actually useful -
repairing the vast amount of damage done by government, and -
exploiting altogether new areas of technical and market opportunity Existing
market work needs
little comment, except to say that since all the stifling regulations have
been removed, this part of the market has been enjoying explosive growth
and has been recruiting actively, so absorbing a large part of the initial
surplus of labor. This segment is the powerhouse of the rapidly growing
American economy.
Replacement
work has been
very interesting to watch. There was a very large number of functions
monopolized by government, but most didn't take a lot of resource; its
main money- and labor-using activity was the useless and destructive one
of redistribution. Roads, however, need maintaining and building, trash
needs handling, justice needs maintaining, air traffic needs guidance,
fires need to be extinguished, the occasional individual aggressors need
apprehending and of course children need educating; the market has taken
over all those and many more with for-profit, competing firms vying for
business and doing the jobs very well for a fraction of their former cost.
That big increase in efficiency means they do it with far fewer people, so
there's been a large loss of jobs in such areas. It's
been partly offset because the massive move to parental education (home
schooling) has meant that millions of moms are no longer working outside
the home and so many of their former jobs needed filling--in a wide
variety of industries. So
far, there has been some demand for armed protection, and companies formed
for the purpose (associated with insurance companies) have employed a few
former members of the Repair
work has been a
very active market segment so far, and although it too will fade away, I
think it likely to continue for several years yet, for the mess government
has left behind is enormous. This "scavenger" segment is new and
has been a large-scale recruiter of labor--often of the very people who
helped create the mess in the first place, since few are better qualified
to mop it up. It's interesting to note where the money is coming from. If
there were still any statist economists around (there aren't), they would
have argued that activity like this is an example of the "free
rider" problem that the market (they said) cannot solve. It
has proven not so, of course. When reporting on "Ownership"
I mentioned one example (of a poison-gas storage facility), and that shows
a pattern for most cases: a creative businessman acquires a government
asset and finds a way to clean up whatever pollution it is causing while
making good money from the operation. The reasons why such entrepreneurs
can do it when government could not are (a) they are rationally motivated
and skilled and (b) they can acquire the asset free (there is a zero
demand for a poison-gas dump!) just by staking the first claim with the
local title company. (There was some talk of selling former
government assets instead, but this method has proven faster, and in the
unusual case that more than one wants the property, nothing stops A from
paying B to quit-claim.) Hence,
creative people get the job done and make fortunes (the biggest so far has
been made by the founder of "Silk Purse Enterprises") while
hiring others to do the work at good pay rates; and the community gains a
clean-up. As always in a free market, everybody wins. New-market
work--the fourth
type, above--is the most exciting and bears most promise for the future. I
anticipate a rapid and endless expansion to come. It is fairly bristling
with opportunities for innovators and those who they employ. Hundreds
of new segments have opened up, with opportunity for investors and
employees alike, even in these first few years of the free society--and
already hundreds of thousands of new enterprises are at work, often
sole-owner ventures or family firms, for everybody's newfound freedom fits
very well with founding and running one's own business. You'll not want a
catalog, so I'll mention just three segments. One
that I love is the personal-flight industry. That idea is a whole century
old, but implementation was not feasible while government regulated the
skies and the market was limited anyway to those with strong flying
skills. In recent years, however, entrepreneurs have developed both
inexpensive helicopters and car/plane hybrids and
collision-avoidance, navigational and automatic-piloting aids so that for
little more than the cost of a good automobile, personal aircraft can be
flown safely from one's back yard to pretty well anywhere, with very
little training, almost as easily as using a point & shoot camera.
This is a market with huge potential and all levels of skills are in
demand, from aeronautical and software engineers to assembly workers. Another
is in the medical research field. Biochem and gene-splicing are hardly
new, but with government nannies no longer brooding over the science with
superstitious, censorious eyes, the promise of stem-cell cures is now
really paying off. Cancer is not quite history yet, but it will be within
a decade. Amazing things are being done for burn and accident victims, to
grow bone and tissue that was destroyed--and even for neurological
diseases, hitherto incurable. Nanotechnology too is fast fulfilling its
promise, with incredibly tiny computers circulating in the body to do the
surgeon's bidding. All this work is naturally the province of the
best-educated, but creative business people play a key part also, in
bringing the techniques to the market so that all can reap rewards while
providing all in need with the best and latest in treatment. This is what
markets do best! Space
continues to beckon, and if Robert Heinlein and Arthur Clarke were still
with us, they'd be in hog-heaven. The pioneering work of the Spaceship
Company in 2005
was repeatedly hobbled by the FedGov's NASA monopoly, but that's now
history and they succeeded this very year in taking a party of paying
passengers on a trip to the Moon--and back, the most important bit. Ticket
prices will tumble as they did for air travel under Dickie Branson's
grandfather, so in the next decade I look for many thousands of people to
go on that awesome trip. Meanwhile, employees and investors are delighted
and plans are afoot for the first tour to Mars--and Donald Jr. is buying
immortality by donating 40 gold tons on condition that the first landing
place be named "Trump Field." Overall,
workers in our free economy enjoy enormous variety and exciting challenge,
and we perform always in the knowledge that we're in full charge of our
own futures and that success depends entirely on ourselves. This contrasts
sharply with the deadly boring nature of dead-end jobs in the old world
but is in perfect harmony with the true nature of self-owning men and
women--and mankind can now achieve whatever he works for. In
his thought-provoking book "The
Closing of the Western Mind",
author Charles Freeman showed that the brilliant progress of the ancient
Greek and Roman world in terms of math, science, engineering and culture
was interrupted in the 4th Century by the deadly alliance of church and
(Roman) state. That postponed progress for a thousand years, until the
Renaissance rediscovered some of the old rational thought patterns and the
Age of Reason developed and exploited them as the influence of throne and
altar, which Robert Ingersoll called "two
vultures from the same egg",
was further reduced. Now, following E-Day, I believe the human race is
poised for an almost unimaginable leap forward, greater by far than either
of those major milestones in Western history; for at long last, the mind
of man has been liberated from both superstitions. Now, there is nothing to stop him. Jim Davies is a retired businessman in New Hampshire who led the development of an on-line school of liberty in 2006, and who expects to experience a free society in his lifetime. |