Gaining Momentum: Now 44 Gun Companies Have Stopped Selling to Law Enforcement in Anti-2nd Amendment States

Comments

Glock27's picture

I had to mark very good. Any time I see peope standing up for the second amendment prohibiting the government of taking advantage of the American People I get excited and filled with hope. This would not have been able to occur in Russsia, China, Korea, etc. I wish someone would find the artiles where the states are doing up legislation against NDAA and the Anti-gun bill. Currently there are about 20 states doing this but it is not enough. All the states need to defy the federal maggot. There are things that can be done it is just getting the people to do it. Like income tax. I guess that if around 10 to 20,000,000 people refused to pay the taxes this would put a hell of a crimp in the gov.
P.S. I wthink the Blaze might be a bit behind because I had information that 50 companies are following that course.

mhstahl's picture

I refuse to believe that anything that Glenn Beck is involved with would ever distort anything....:)

Glock27's picture

Not exactly sure what you are refering to but the manufactures. My first knowledge came from Gun Owners of America GOA probably more vital to keeping our guns than the NRA. I am not positive but I believe also the the Second Amendment Rights Organization published the same thing. His 44 is definitely of by 6 if I go by GOA.

mhstahl's picture

I was makin a funny, son!

Glock27's picture

If you are not older than 68 you cannot call me son:)

mjackso6's picture

On the face of it, this looks great, but my inner paranoid has been bugging me since this trend started. I think about what sorts of evil I'd perpetrate if I were in Authority's shoes (may that never come to pass, knock-on-wood!), and it occurs to me that a full-blown rebellion from the firearms industry, threatening the supply of firearms and ammunition to the forces of Uncle Sam, Mom and apple pie, would be a wonderful excuse to exercise some of those only-in-case-of-doomsday (so they ~swore~ to us) provisions of the NDAA and all of those other Executive Orders and pieces of legislation that have been shuffled in under our noses. I mean, denying arms and ammo to 'the good guys' could be construed as a national emergency, and maybe even collaborating with those dastardly terrorist folks, couldn't it? And if that were the case, they'd be perfectly within their rights, nay, bound by their 'duty', to ensure the unrestricted flow of these 'tools of freedom' to all of our 'boys in uniform', wouldn't they? So confiscating and 'nationalizing' most or all of the firearms industry would practically ~be~ their duty, wouldn't it? And of course, there are provisions in the NDAA to allow anyone to be assigned to any job deemed 'necessary' to national defense in case of 'national emergency', and how could the denial of their 'tools of justice' to 'our boys' by a bunch of evil, gun pedaling old filthy-rich businessmen be anything less? Yeah, ok, a little melodramatic, I know, and I'm sure that it's not likely that they'd take things to this level, but I don't see a damn thing that says they ~couldn't~. I'd hate to see us all fall into a relatively obvious trap (if brain-damaged 'ol me can see this, anyone can, and for all of their other faults, stupidity, unfortunately, isn't one of them) and end up essentially handing the entire firearms industry over to Them lock, stock and barrell. I'm sure that you can all imagine how things might progress from there.