|
Separation of Me and State by B.R. Merrick
July 27, 2009 I
listened to Dr. Laura every once in a while years ago, back when I was
proudly religious and conservative. She
was, and I assume still is, unabashedly conservative.
She took a lot of abuse for it, but she stuck with it.
(Of course, it did make her a millionaire.)
One time when I was listening, a man called in to tell her that a
young woman he knew had just had an abortion.
What should he tell his children?
Dr. Laura, in her typical fashion, practically cut him off: “You
are not to gossip.” I was a
little surprised to hear this response, but after a while it made sense.
Speaking ill of others and their private behavior is indeed gossip.
This advice came from a woman who is staunchly pro-life.
That’s a pretty impressive and mature way to handle such a
dilemma. The simple truth was,
the man was asking the wrong question.
It is Dr. Laura’s approach that I would like to take here, with
these Frequently Asked Questions from
the website for Freedom From
Religion Foundation, although it could be argued that my approach will
be slightly less mature. I may
agree with many of their
findings as an ex-believer, but their responses to many FAQs leave much
for a peaceful anarchist to desire. Feel
free to peruse their replies, and see how they stack up against my Dr.
Laura-esque answers below. Christmas
Displays on Public Property The
whole thing is a bit silly if you ask me.
The idea that such a scene should be that offensive to anyone is
patently ridiculous. Who
doesn’t love a Nativity scene? What
is not silly, but deeply concerning to me, is that your question does not
address the real dilemma: Why does the government forcefully take
property, declare it “public,” and then forbid or favor the free
exercise of any individual’s or group’s religious beliefs on that
property? Am I free to mention
the word “Christmas” when I visit the Prayers
at Government Meetings See
the first sentence above. If I
feel like praying, I can do it wherever I want on “public” property,
since they can’t deny me the free exercise thereof.
You don’t have to listen, participate, or wait for my prayer to
finish. If the majority of
people in the room, built with stolen money, wish to participate with me,
you’re going to look awfully foolish if you don’t at least sit quietly
and wait for my supplications to finish.
Almost as foolish as I will look praying to a deity whose existence
I now seriously question. In
fact, your petty concern here is tempting me to do it just to spite you.
Furthermore, you are once again asking the wrong question: What
right does this government have to exist and steal money to build
buildings, let alone condone one man’s prayer over anyone else’s? Court-Ordered
Participation in A.A. As
far as I understand A.A.,
the only thing overtly religious about it is that it admits or encourages
belief in a “higher power.” If
you’re this afraid of religion, then I would rather not have someone
like you lobbying government. It’s
as offensive to me as when I see a member of the religious right demanding
the exact opposite from the same bloody, violent, lying, thieving
institution. I disagree with
A.A. for different reasons due to my inclination to believe what Alice
Miller says about it, but when I read sentences like the one below in
the site’s response to this FAQ: “Using
the coercion test, a number of courts have recently found that forcing
prisoners or probationers to attend Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics
Anonymous meetings under the threat that some benefit or right will be
withheld for failing to attend is a violation of the Establishment Clause
of the First Amendment,” I
find it hard to believe that you are unable, due to your abnormal fear of
some future theocracy, to conclude the following: Using the coercion test,
a number of free-thinking individuals have found that forcing prisoners or
probationers to live in squalor and be raped on a regular basis is not
justice when someone has been robbed, raped, lied to, beaten, kidnapped,
or murdered. For murder, there
can be no justice, as life cannot be restored to the victim.
For robbery, the stolen property must be restored in order to
satisfy justice. For being
lied to, there can be only partial justice if loss of property or
reputation was involved; the liar being what he is has destroyed trust,
without which there can be no sensible relationship between two or more
people. In most cases, justice
is not served by putting someone behind bars, unless that individual is
exceedingly and unrepentantly violent and threatening.
However, even that isn’t justice.
It’s just a safety measure. Other
than that, people are placed in prison for revenge and the government’s
sickening need for control. In
light of these facts, WHO GIVES A DAMN WHETHER THE PATHETIC BASTARDS ARE
SENT TO A.A.??!! Churches
Meeting at Public Schools What
an excellent reason for dimwitted, weak-kneed parents to finally pull
their defenseless children out of the lion’s
den! State
of the Law on Churches and Religious Groups Meeting in Public Schools Who
gives a damn? Your children
are abused mentally everyday, emotionally many days, and sometimes even
physically, when they are sent to the lion’s den.
Religious groups in “public” schools, like A.A. in prisons, are
the least of your concern. Well,
they should be. You’ve
already stopped listening, haven’t you?
Well, I feel sorry for your kids. Prayer
in Public School Again:
What an excellent reason for dimwitted, weak-kneed parents to finally pull
their defenseless children out of the lion’s den!
Or would you rather wait for the day when “public” school
officials start handing out crack
vials? See
You at the Flag Pole Prayer Gatherings Okay,
you haven’t been listening, and probably won’t if I get too unfeeling
about your warped socialist questions.
Therefore, I will simply respond to this reply from the site: “There
are parameters. Even the “See You at the Pole” adult promoters admit
that school officials may neither encourage nor discourage
participation.” The
only parameter in the lion’s den should be not to make attendance a
requirement. This is, of
course, what they ought to do with all classes, credits, report cards, and
so on. Furthermore, what
happens if a religious teacher (“OH MY [lack of] GOD!
A RELIGIOUS PERSON IS A TEACHER AT MY CHILD’S
SCHOO-HOO-HOOL-L-L-L!!!”) wants to attend a pole-gathering-and-praying
thing? Would that be
considered “encouragement”? And
now I’m sorry, but I have to get up in your nether-regions once more:
Why is this your biggest concern, and not the fact that sending your
defenseless child into this environment will forever poison his brain?
What the hell kind of parent are you? Distribution
of Religious Literature in Public Schools Get
back to me when the teacher gives your kid a crack vial.
*Click – br-r-r-r-r-r-r…* Next
caller. Religious
Activities at Senior Centers Set
up your own goddamn senior center and stop stealing my money. What on
earth is your problem with a little prayer, for Chrissakes?
Prayer to a mythical God bothers you, but stealing my money
doesn’t?! Religious
Decorations & Activities HUD Housing You
have no rights to avoid such activities and decorations in HUD Housing.
I personally ordered them when I discovered that the government was
stealing money from me to pay for your housing.
As long as you live under my roof… Pledge
of Allegiance Was
this a typo? Did you mean to
ask: Does my child have to participate at school?
The answer is, “No.” Remember
that, little Jimmy, “No.” Citizen
Oath There
are millions of people now living in this country without the
government-required documentation. It
is clear that the government is less and less interested in doing anything
about them. There is strength
in numbers. Don’t worry
about some silly oath, and forget about the word “citizen.”
Now you don’t have to worry about the religious aspect, do you?
Buena suerte! Jury
Oath I
may be wrong, but if you call up your county voter registration office and
have your name removed from the voter registration rolls, you may not be
called for jury duty at all. At
least, I haven’t been called up for duty since I
renounced all violence. Other
than that, this is one small area where I agree with the answers to these
FAQs. Check
out their response. Although,
having to swear to tell the truth to anyone says something tragic about
humanity, doesn’t it? I hate
to quote someone who frightens you, “But let your communication be, Yea,
yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.”
(Matthew 5:37) The
dude’s right. Marriage
Oaths Don’t
get married by the state! Your
love doesn’t need a piece of paper.
Religious couples need God’s confirmation only.
Everyone else can plan as they wish.
Plus, if you’re the guy, you should read my
article instead of worrying about the dreaded theocracy’s invasion
of your beloved secular state. (“You
got religion in my state!” “You
got state in my religion!”) Church
Bulletin Discounts Thanks
to pinheads like you, if I open up a restaurant or store, I have to abide
by the arbitrary rules of a government which murders,
lies, and threatens.
You are not welcome in my restaurant or store.
Get out. Go get a
lawyer, crybaby. Learn to be
offended. I’m one of those
dreaded 9/11 “Troothers,”
so I know all about being offended, on a regular basis.
I mean it. Get out.
Take your poison-brained little brat with you. Consumer
Complaints I
agree with the site on this one, except for some petty semantic
differences, along with the pettiness of the complaint itself: “This
is a consumer complaint, not a state/church
violation [emphasis mine]…’vote
with your feet’…The world is full of secular music.” The
voluntary church, as illogical, absurd, and misguided as it can be, has
murdered less people, and done far more good for individuals and families
(including my own) than any involuntary government ever has or will.
The church did not bomb True,
in olden days, various churches behaved violently and dishonestly.
But that was back when they had The
Ring, and to paraphrase Gollum, “Then they
be the master!” The state
officially separated itself from religion in this country long ago.
It is a pity that the more murderous of the two didn’t separate
itself from us. I’ll take a
mild-mannered member of the Christian right any day over you and your
annoying, state-worshipping complaints.
You’ve got the wrong villain, in almost every way.
Idiots. You want to save us all from religion. Who will save us from yours? Your incomprehensible belief in the power of a benevolent government is nothing less fanciful than hope in Jesus, Jehovah, Allah, or even Santa Claus. I live in a theocracy of your making, a satanic cult that receives your continued support. Personally, I’d much rather go back to church. B.R.
Merrick lives in the Northeast, is
proud to be a classical music reviewer
at Amazon.com
and iTunes, and in spite of the poisonous nature of television, God
Himself will have to pry his DVDs of “Monty Python’s Flying
Circus” out of his cold, dead hands, under threat of eternal damnation.
|