|
Religion by Jim Davies
February 18, 2008 This
is the last in my series of eight reports
from the year 2030
about life in our newly-free society. I hope you've enjoyed them so far,
and although they are rightly very upbeat, I hope you also agree they
included "warts and all"--that they came without unjustified
bias. If so, I also hope you'll be hungering and thirsting to help make
it happen. Of
course, with the benefit of time-warped hindsight, I know that you did. All
those hopes are mentioned because this last report will disappoint a
number of readers. I'm sorry about it, but--to coin a phrase--that's the
way it is. It will represent,
for some, a large additional wart. Anyone
who knows what a free-market society is can also see that it works
wonderfully but only if everyone understands it and wants it. By
"everyone," I don't mean there must be literally zero
practitioners of initiated force, but that their number be so small that
our ordinary, efficient, competitive justice
industry can
handle the residue; that is, that they number no more than around 1%. The
need for understanding and desire can be verified easily. Suppose that a
magic wand abolished government tomorrow morning at That
much was clear before 2008, or should have been. Now, the nature of that
re-education started with the rational understanding of what human beings
are and what government is, by their core nature in each case. This
required that every student base his life on reason above all. Once
those questions are addressed and answered rationally, the only society
compatible with human nature is rapidly seen to be one without a
government. So rational
thought is indispensable to freedom--and fortunately, rational thought is
an activity of which every human being is capable. Okay, end of lengthy
preamble! So,
rational thought leads quickly to acceptance of anarchism, but it also
leads to acceptance of atheism; and so we come to the subject of this
report. Just as government is an obvious myth when examined rationally, so
is god an obvious myth when examined rationally; and it's not consistent
to accept the one conclusion on rational grounds without also accepting
the other on rational grounds. It's not that religion is important or that
atheism is a prerequisite for living free--not at all.
Rather, rational thought is most certainly a prerequisite for
living free, and rational thought leads also (and incidentally, if you
will) to atheism. Even
so, a lot of good people eager to rid society of the scourge of government
believed in God. Further, the very essence of "freedom" is that
everyone is free to do and believe whatever he wishes, in and with his own
life--so it is obviously impossible to have a society that is free, and
yet which prohibits religion! These are the logical difficulties that
needed to be overcome. Here's
how it has worked out, and first: nobody in the new, free In
the process of learning the indispensable habit of thinking only in
rational, economic terms, virtually everyone came (rightly)
to see that traditional religions were as absurd, irrational and
dangerous as government--indeed, that they are "two
vultures from the same egg."
There were, however, exceptions; some exercised their rational faculties
regarding the latter, but suspended them regarding the former. I can't
explain this, I merely reflect sadly on the power of superstition. These
folk continue to attend church and to embrace the story that there is a
creator (who lacks both a crisp definition and any theory about who
created him) who (out of all his billions and billions of stars and
planets) interested himself in one particular species on this particular
rock; who is said to be "good" yet created that species with the
capacity to choose to do "evil" which he also created (since,
allegedly, nothing exists that he did not create) but then blames people
for choosing it; and who took human form by a virgin birth (!) and
underwent death and resurrection.
It's a tale that has MYTH written all over it in giant letters, but they
go on believing it anyway. In this new, free, rational society, they
persist in worshipping an imaginary deity who allegedly appoints
governments--entities
that have always practiced far more evil than all others combined--to suppress
wrongdoing! This is all
evident in their Internet profiles (something they don't mind), so anyone
poised to do business with them takes it into account. No doubt some shy
away, wondering that if they can be that irrational and eccentric, how can
they be trusted to honor a contract? But
others take the view that church folk are as honest as the day is long and
as pleasant and kindly as they come--so it comes out for them in the wash.
It's beyond me to account for such glaring contradictions, but as long as
these folk don't aggress--and they don't--there is no problem. For
the most part, however, religion has been dumped. In the early years of
this century, there was supposed to be a large minority of believers, in Did
the abandonment of formal religion lead to some kind of psychological
"hole" in life? Not
a bit of it. On the contrary, the rational understanding in the case of
every person that he or she is the sole, sovereign owner of his own life
was absolutely thrilling and liberating, and formed the mainspring of the
urgent desire to experience it in practice! It was (for nearly everyone)
by no means difficult to shed the superstition that we are really owned by
some invisible, inaudible, intangible deity--any more so than to shed the
superstition that we owe some allegiance to an invisible, inaudible,
intangible state. Far from causing a hole or deficiency in our
self-esteem, it has all wonderfully repaired holes and deficiencies--we
are now whole human beings and are not afraid to explore our inner beings
along with all else that this marvelous life has to offer. There's
plenty of meditation going on, as part of that endless and fascinating
exploration. Quiet contemplation of the wonders of nature and of one's own
person has replaced religion, for many people--and the contemplation of
someone else's needs is what replaced "prayer"--in fact, a few
still call it prayer.
Prayer
was never proved to have changed the prayee one iota--but it can certainly
have a beneficial effect on the prayor, by focusing his thoughts and
perhaps leading to an idea for achieving himself the objective desired.
This all increases the general benevolence in society and so does it good
and helps enhance its peace. Peace, justice, prosperity, health, knowledge, self-fulfilment--these are features of our society in Free America; and they all stem from freedom, or self ownership. Urgently seek freedom, you folk back in 2008, and those other, priceless attributes will become yours. See you soon! Jim Davies is a retired businessman in New Hampshire who led the development of an on-line school of liberty in 2006, and who expects to experience a free society in his lifetime. |