"Patriotism is a kind of religion; it is the egg from which wars are hatched." ~ Guy de Maupassant
When the Government Promises It Won’t Abuse Its Powers, It’s Lying
Submitted by Derek Henson on Sat, 2010-12-04 04:00
0
Your rating: None
User Login
Search This Site
Recent comments
-
1 day 19 hours ago
-
2 days 8 hours ago
-
3 days 5 hours ago
-
3 days 6 hours ago
-
3 days 7 hours ago
-
3 days 10 hours ago
-
4 days 17 hours ago
-
5 days 19 hours ago
-
6 days 12 hours ago
-
6 days 16 hours ago
Root Strikers
Supporters
Merchandise
User Map
Latest Tweets
New recommended column on STR: The Voluntary Voice (Book Review #4) http://t.co/6QCn3oykFR
2 days 20 hours ago
New recommended column on STR: Dante’s Divine Comedy and the Divine Origins of the Free Market http://t.co/jW0qF12WRc
5 days 19 hours ago
- 1 of 41
- ››







Reprint Rights
Comments
"When the Government Promises It Won't Abuse Its Powers, It's Lying"
No kidding?
Is this the same government which promised that the SSN was NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION and even printed it, IN ALL CAPS, on the first cards issued?[1]
And then, less than thirty years later, reneged on that "promise".
"In 1961, Congress authorized the IRS to use the Social Security number--a nine-digit number issued by the Social Security Administration--as a taxpayer identification number. The Social Security number is issued to American citizens, permanent residents and working residents--it is needed to seek legal employment in the United States or to receive Social Security benefits." [Emphasis added]
Why anyone on this planet would continue to believe anything passing the lips of any government AGENT is beyond comprehension!
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me a million times shame on me.
[1] My thanks to S.C.A.N. [SOVEREIGN CITIZENS AGAINST NUMBERING]
"The Social Security number is issued to American citizens, permanent residents and working residents--it is needed to seek legal employment in the United States or to receive Social Security benefits." [Emphasis added]
Notice that it's apparently not "needed" to seek employment, it is only "needed" to seek legal employment. So, what is "legal employment"? Basically, it means employment that is "legally recognized" by THEIR CORPORATE LAW. A person with a social security number is "legally recognized" as what? As a "taxpayer", i.e. "one who is subject to a tax". Have we not seen, elsewhere, that the social security number is a "taxpayer identification number"? http://strike-the-root.com/taxation-is-robbery
So, why would a free man, i.e. one who is not a member of that voluntary association, want his employment "legally recognized" by that corporation?
Answer: He wouldn't!! The social security number is a charagma, a badge of servitude!
"Badges, to god-damned hell with badges! We have no badges. In fact, we don't need badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges, you god-damned cabrón and ching' tu madre! Come out from that shit-hole of yours. I have to speak to you."
That quote was from The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, written by B. Traven, the pen name of a German novelist, whose real name, nationality, date and place of birth and details of biography are all subject to dispute. How appropriate is that?
Those who are not numbered do not "legally" exist...they are considered "nonpersons" or "unpersons"[1], that is to say, they are not "persons".
Homo vocabulum est naturate; persona juris civilis – Man is a term of nature; person of civil law. ~ Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1914), “Maxim,” page 2136
PERSON. A man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. 1 Bouv. Inst. no. 137. ~ A Dictionary of Law (c.1891), page 892 [Emphasis added]
It's all about "entitlements" and "duties".
Que sentit commodum, sentire debet et onus. He who derives a benefit from a thing, ought to feel the disadvantages attending it. 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1433.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Endnotes
[1] Webster's 1988 New World Dictionary of American English – Third College Edition
non per-son (nan’ per’ sen) n. UNPERSON; specif. one who is officially ignored by the government
un-per-son (un’per’sen) n. a person completely ignored, as if non-existent
Merriam-Webster's Collegiate® Dictionary & Thesaurus
Main Entry: non.per.son
Pronunciation: 'nän-'p&r-s[^&]n
Function: noun
Date: circa 1909 : a person who is regarded as nonexistent: as a : UNPERSON b : one having no social or legal status
Main Entry: un.per.son
Pronunciation: '&n-'p&r-s[^&]n, -"p&r-
Function: noun
Date: 1949 : an individual who usually for political or ideological reasons is removed completely from recognition or consideration
yourDictionary.com
non·per·son A person whose existence is systematically ignored or concealed, especially one whose removal from the attention and memory of the public is sought for reasons of ideological or political deviation.
un·per·son (un′pʉr′sən) noun a person who is completely ignored, as if he or she does not exist; specif., such a person officially ignored by his or her own government [Emphasis added]
If the Social Security bill could have passed the House, Social Security individuals could have received one $250 check in addition to their regular benefits. Because Social Security won't have a cost-of-living boost, or COLA, in 2011, lawmakers wanted to throw seniors, veterans as well as the handicapped a $250 bone. The GOP prevailed in killing the bill on the grounds that the nation could not afford adding another $14 billion to the deficit.