Supreme Court Won't Revive Lawsuit against Disgraced Ex-Detroit Judge

Comments

Paul's picture

Laws are for peons, not the ruling class.

Oh, sorry, I forgot that this privilege is supposed to buy judicial "impartiality". Our judges are all impartial, aren't they?

Samarami's picture

Paul:

    "...'Our' judges are all impartial, aren't they?..."

Don't know how many "judges" you have, Paul. I have One -- Who is Impartial as I understand it. I haven't been "judged" yet as far as I can tell. I should be in a position to tell you more indisputably in 30 years or so.

Or so I'm told. I don't know that for certain. I'm a skeptic when it comes to religious and/or "scientific" proclamations.

I had a judge once. He diagnosed me as "pathological nonconformist" (as he sentenced me to 30 days in jail for drunk & disorderly, the rat). Later he asked me to be his AA sponsor. I did that until he died several years ago now. We often laughed that I never asked him to retract his sentencing statement -- I think he stood solidly behind it until the end.

What comes around, goes around.

Sam