"Equality of opportunity is freedom, but equality of outcome is repression." ~ Dick Feagler
Secessionist Thinking Revived In America With Controversy And Questions
Submitted by Michael Kleen on Fri, 2010-12-17 04:00
in
Could it be realistically done, however, without there being terrorism, violence, severe conflict, and disastrous consequences? Are there any historical precedents? Yes, as a matter of fact.
0
Your rating: None
User Login
Search This Site
Recent comments
-
2 hours 32 min ago
-
8 hours 31 min ago
-
1 day 1 hour ago
-
1 day 2 hours ago
-
1 day 2 hours ago
-
1 day 2 hours ago
-
1 day 15 hours ago
-
1 day 15 hours ago
-
1 day 16 hours ago
-
1 day 16 hours ago
Root Strikers
Helpers
Merchandise
User Map
Latest Tweets
New recommended column on STR: Protecting Your Family from Fukushima Radiation and Other Health Threats http://t.co/muyRg52J
2 days 14 hours ago
New recommended column on STR: So You Work as an Elections Clerk? http://t.co/RNCrgMRJ
6 days 15 hours ago
- 1 of 13
- ››







Reprint Rights
Comments
English must be this author's second or third language; this was painful to read.
But that aside, why is it that virtually all of these advocates of secession fail to take this act to its lowest, (and most moral), common denominator, individual secession?
Is it because they are afraid to act alone that these so-called secessionists adopt the modus operandi of statists, which is that of dragging along with them, kicking and screaming, people not desirous of their goal?
And, why are the freedom loving individuals, who espouse, live and promote "individual secession", ostracized[1] by those most clamorously claiming to be "secessionists", "individualists", "anarchists", "voluntaryists", and "libertarians"?
“To believe in something, and not to live it, is dishonest.” ~ Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
[1] Quick definitions from Macmillan (ostracize) verb ▸to stop accepting someone as a member of a group and refuse to talk or listen to them