"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." ~ H.L. Mencken
Liberty Isn’t A Thought Experiment for a Philosophy Term Paper
What Nozick or Rawls thought about intrinsic human inequality and other topics teased out to their ultimate end is just the sort of thing for life-tenured academics to noodle over. They get payed for that. But if you and I don’t want to live and die as slaves, we need to blow that stuff off and get on with it. So there. Somebody had to say it.
0
Your rating: None
- Login to post comments
User Login
Search This Site
Recent comments
-
11 weeks 5 days ago
-
30 weeks 4 days ago
-
38 weeks 4 days ago
-
39 weeks 1 day ago
-
39 weeks 2 days ago
-
1 year 11 weeks ago
-
1 year 15 weeks ago
-
1 year 15 weeks ago
-
1 year 15 weeks ago
-
1 year 26 weeks ago
Comments
This excerpt is from an essay from the paleo-con Claremont Institute webzine about "establishment" (i.e.., NYC, D.C.-based) conservative operatives and journalists, but it applies to most libertarians and anarchos any more too. (Yeah, I'm looking at you Gary Johnson.)
"How have the last two decades worked out for you, personally? If you’re a member or fellow-traveler of the Davos class, chances are: pretty well. If you’re among the subspecies conservative intellectual or politician, you’ve accepted—perhaps not consciously, but unmistakably—your status on the roster of the Washington Generals of American politics. Your job is to show up and lose, but you are a necessary part of the show and you do get paid. To the extent that you are ever on the winning side of anything, it’s as sophists who help the Davoisie oligarchy rationalize open borders, lower wages, outsourcing, de-industrialization, trade giveaways, and endless, pointless, winless war."
Why they lose. And why we lose too. This whole system has to collapse, and die, and a lot of us with it. But sadly it shows an amazing level of resilience and adaptability for a dying beast. To paraphrase the fictional anarcho-nihilist Tyler Durden, the problem isn't the coming apocalypse, it's that it never arrives. You can't rebuild a burning house, yet the house never fully burns or collapses. A hell worthy of Sisyphus.