"Bureaucracy, the rule of no one, has become the modern form of despotism." ~ Mary McCarthy
If a Pure Market Economy is So Good, Why Doesn't It Exist?
User Login
Search This Site
Recent comments
-
3 hours 12 min ago
-
3 hours 52 min ago
-
3 hours 58 min ago
-
4 hours 1 min ago
-
17 hours 9 min ago
-
17 hours 23 min ago
-
18 hours 6 min ago
-
18 hours 11 min ago
-
18 hours 25 min ago
-
18 hours 30 min ago
Root Strikers
Helpers
Merchandise
User Map
Latest Tweets
New recommended column on STR: Protecting Your Family from Fukushima Radiation and Other Health Threats http://t.co/muyRg52J
1 day 16 hours ago
New recommended column on STR: So You Work as an Elections Clerk? http://t.co/RNCrgMRJ
5 days 17 hours ago
- 1 of 13
- ››







Reprint Rights
Comments
This is a long scholarly article and the basic theme is that it's possible to change society, and that a prerequisite for change is to change the beliefs or attitudes of some critical mass of the population. In itself, this is not a new or startling conclusion, but I've never seen the question addressed so thoroughly before and the authors make a good case for their position.
Agreed. Unfortunately, for the purposes of my comment, there are far too many money quotes, especially when I take under consideration an ongoing discussion with one of my friends concerning the feasibility of anarchy:
"Nonetheless, the obvious fact that events beyond anyone’s control affect people’s preferences, and do so in ways not fully understood, should no more inevitably lead libertarians to strategic pessimism than it leads business people to abandon all marketing and advertising."
This article is an absolute gem.