"Patriotism is a kind of religion; it is the egg from which wars are hatched." ~ Guy de Maupassant
The Greater Good
Submitted by strike on Sun, 2012-10-07 00:00
User Login
Search This Site
Recent comments
-
7 hours 19 min ago
-
19 hours 47 min ago
-
1 day 16 hours ago
-
1 day 17 hours ago
-
1 day 18 hours ago
-
1 day 21 hours ago
-
3 days 4 hours ago
-
4 days 6 hours ago
-
4 days 23 hours ago
-
5 days 3 hours ago
Root Strikers
Supporters
Merchandise
User Map
Latest Tweets
New recommended column on STR: The Voluntary Voice (Book Review #4) http://t.co/6QCn3oykFR
1 day 7 hours ago
New recommended column on STR: Dante’s Divine Comedy and the Divine Origins of the Free Market http://t.co/jW0qF12WRc
4 days 7 hours ago
- 1 of 41
- ››







Reprint Rights
Comments
I think one of the most dangerous ideas to our liberty today is the "greater good" argument. That an individual is part of "society". These false doctrines have tremendous impact on our freedom of choice. Vaccines mandated for "public" health seem not that unlikely in the near future in this country. The fact is there is no such thing as "public" health. There is only individual health.
Vaccines hit home to me because they are personal to our bodies, and who other than myself personally should have the right to mandate what I MUST do?
Great video, and I hope it hits the fact that in 1905 the supreme court upheld mandatory vaccinations as constitutional. That is one dangerous precedent!
DP Thinker:
'I think one of the most dangerous ideas to our liberty today is the "greater good" argument. That an individual is part of "society" '.
Some years ago I came across an essay by Delmar England that has helped me immensely. His argument, which hits many of us right here at STR in the gut (and I suspect that is why I've never seen much in the way of accolades at STR for England's ideas), outlines precisely the description you've given to this issue of vaccines -- a language game:
'The fact is there is no such thing as "public" health. There is only individual health'.
"Language of lies" terms are over long periods overtly and subtly planted into a great many of the thoughts and statements of even us "libertarians" and "anarchists". It is down right difficult to break oneself of their use. Even after coming to see (and admit, which is the hard part) it is not easy. Because I suspect I might not be as "free" as I'd like you to believe.
I'll read libertarians make statements like, "the state commits violence".
The state does not commit violence. The abstract term "state" describes violence -- in its most egregious form. It is the gangsters and their parasitic minions grouped into what they call "the state" that commit the violence.
Engaging in the "language of lies" term insulates the perpetrators of the violence. It allows them to hide behind a godlike abstract, "the state" as though "it" were a living, breathing beast.
Good observation, DP. Sam