![]() |
Strike The Root |
|
There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root. |
|
|
|
|
No Peace For Gun Owners
Eventually,
the politicians had to return to their traditional pre-terrorist
freedom-stealing ways, and they’ve done it with unabashed fervor. John McCain--the cantankerous senator from Arizona and noted
anti-self defense advocate--and socialist co-sponsors Charles Schumer
and Ted Kennedy introduced legislation last week to further restrict the
ability of peaceful citizens to purchase weapons.
Aptly
titled the "Our Lady of Peace Act" (I just love these names!),
the bill requires states to tattle to the Feds on anyone who is
disqualified from buying a gun during a background check.
The reasons for disqualification are many.
Any history of mental illness gets you an automatic lifetime ban.
Illegal aliens are prohibited from buying guns for self-defense.
Anyone convicted of felony drug possession is out of luck, no
matter how small the amount of illicit substance involved.
Anyone who has been the subject of a domestic violence
restraining order is denied the ability to purchase a firearm--despite
the fact that some local jurisdictions throughout the country
automatically issue restraining orders when couples file for divorce,
even if there is no previous evidence of domestic abuse.
The bill is simply another step towards abolition of private gun
ownership in the United States. As
an "incentive" for states to abide by the new regulations, the
bill imposes noncompliance penalties that include withholding of federal
funds for crime prevention. Additionally,
the bill will lighten the wallets of taxpayers to the tune of $250
million annually for the next three years--chump change in the Beltway
world of multi-billion dollar subsidies and multi-trillion dollar
national debts. Why
do so many members of Congress harbor such a deep fear and animosity
regarding the individual’s ability to keep and bear arms?
One would assume that they would be just as concerned about their
own safety and the well being of their families as ordinary Americans
are. Yet, closer inspection
reveals the hypocrisy of the Capitol Hill Mafia. Like
most Americans, Congressional members spend much of their day at work.
But the Capitol building is unlike any other workplace in the
country. In fact, it is
probably one of the most heavily guarded places in the world.
Even prior to September 11, the building resembled a fortress.
Nonetheless, Congress and the President passed a $20 billion
anti-terror bill that included extensive funding for a massive security
overhaul of the Capitol soon after the terrorist attacks.
The
transformation included a $600 million security plan to protect Congress
members, employees, and visitors; the installation of an anti-vehicle
perimeter around the 276-acre Capitol complex; the addition of 151
officers to the 1,300 member Capitol police force; a new police command
center and headquarters; the addition of 72 agents in a new chemical and
biological response team whose duties include increasing protection for
Congress members and their families; and $65 million for anthrax
testing, decontamination efforts and new mail handling procedures.
The
latest indulgence--on the taxpayer dole, of course--is the stockpiling
of 25,000 special gas masks designed to provide immediate protection to
members and staff in the event of a chemical or biological weapons
attack at the Capitol. The
cost? $100 apiece.
It is no wonder that these elitist bureaucrats are not concerned about any individual responsibility for self-defense. They have ensured themselves a level of protection that is far beyond that of any ordinary American. Yet, their endless crusade to deprive citizens of their own right to defend themselves should serve as a grim reminder of the oppressive nature of those who seek power through government. discuss this column in the forum Mike Powers is a former Libertarian Party activist and soon-to-be-former resident of Atlanta. He is relocating to the Chicago area, a city known for its ban on the personal ownership of firearms.
|