Probably
the most obvious fact to emerge from the War on Terrorism is
the state's refusal to consider its hand in causing the
terror they're fighting. For generations, the state
has played an aggressive role in the affairs of other
countries, shunning the advice of our founders. Given
our presence in world affairs, one might expect more people
to question whether we belong there. But as we've
witnessed, quite the opposite is true. Those who
question the state at this level are either ignored as
cranks or condemned as traitors.
But the truth is too obvious to ignore. The state is
hurting us in countless ways. It won't stop until we
stop it. The illusion that the state represents the
people of this country is a child's game. We must
assert ourselves as adults and put an end to it -- before it
puts an end to us.
Until then, we put up with the state's version of justice,
such as the embarrassing investigative attempts to uncover
the causes of 9-11. Did we have advance warning?
Were the various intelligence agencies not
cooperating? Were they underfunded? These are
not the right questions. They are state-approved
questions, because they don't threaten the power of the
state.
The unstated axiom guiding national policy is: nothing
must threaten government power or government growth. Every
failure is an excuse for more power to fix what failed.
Every illusory success justifies further
aggrandizement to do even more.
Consider the nature of the state and what it's competent at
doing. We know it does things through force or threat
of force. With its methods, can it produce wealth?
Can it change bad attitudes? Can it keep
us from ingesting harmful substances? Can it get us to
ingest beneficial substances? Can it educate
us? Can it protect us? Can it make the
economy work better? Can it provide adequate
retirement funds for our future?
It can't do any of these things, but it makes a pretense of
trying. And it does so with our tacit permission, in
defiance of the Constitution. And every time it fails,
it says let me try again, only this time with more money and
power. So now, for instance, we have the Homeland
Security obscenity. How many times does it have to
fail before it empties our pockets and takes complete
control of our lives?
And herein lies the state's competency: it keeps us from
rejecting it for its failures.
None of its failures are little-known secrets. They
are infamous. They are well-documented. In many
cases, they are blindingly obvious. They are the
emperor with no clothes. They are not unique to the
U.S. or to the current or previous century. Throughout
history, government intrusions invariably fail to produce
their stated objectives.
The alleged function of the state is to protect its
citizens. Yet in the 20th century, governments
worldwide accounted for the slaughter of 220 million people,
170 million of which were killed by their own states. [1]
It takes enormous duplicity to cover up so much evidence.
How is this accomplished? The state blames
someone else. It finds a scapegoat that is universally
loathed, such that mere mention of its name condemns it.
In recruiting this scapegoat, the state evidently paid
close attention to the way successful religions work.
Most people will tell you man needs religion. "If
God didn't exist, it would be necessary to invent Him,"
as Voltaire is accused of saying. Most people will
tell you man needs some kind of government. Even some
of its critics will admit the state is a necessary evil.
To remove all external authority from man -- God and
the state -- is to condemn him to death from
self-indulgence, though history is a little short on
specific examples of this claim.
Is man's alleged weakness all that's needed for religion to
capture his soul? As it turns out, no. He needs
a constant threat, a metaphysical terror, to keep him in
line. Thus, we have the devil.
Having nothing better to do, the devil exploits man's
weakness and leads him into a state of depravity. Man
finds the strength to resist the devil only through belief.
Believe and you are saved.
To a politician, that's a pretty neat con. But where
will a pol find the analogue to the devil in politics?
Any guesses?
Before you blurt out "business," consider that
businessmen, even in our envy-ridden culture, are difficult
to indict for certain things, such as flying jumbo jets into
100-story towers. Not that they weren't blamed --
according to the knee-jerk crowd, the airlines welcomed the
9-11 hijackers onto their planes without sufficient security
checks, putting profits before safety. But not
everyone was comfortable with that explanation by itself.
Therefore, the cause of 9-11 was business plus another evil,
the terrorists. The full explanation became:
terrorists, supported by business, caused the disaster of
September 11th.
What are frightened Americans to do in those circumstances?
They do what they've always done: run to the
state.
And the state will greet them like lost sheep returning to
the fold -- provided they understand a few ground rules.
First, the people must understand that since the state
agrees to save them, they must let the state do whatever is
necessary to secure their safety. Let's not hear any
noise about the Constitution -- this is your life we're
talking about. Second, since people have a habit of
trying to understand things, they must accept the state's
explanation of why horror befell them. And the state,
in its infinite magnanimity, agrees to share the blame for
part of the failure. It really does -- provided, as
earlier noted, this failure in no way threatens its power.
Those who charge the state per se for the disaster
are, by decree, traitors or terrorists, since both are
enemies of the state.
Like a successful religion, the state has secured a firm
foundation in our lives. It forbids questioning of
fundamentals and instead offers a child-like explanation of
why things go wrong when it gets involved. All is well
in the U.S. of A. Come to it as a child and show your
faith by believing, and believers will be saved.
Americans need to accept the full horror of government
betrayal or pay the consequences. To borrow from
Voltaire again: "As long as people believe in
absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities."
References
1. Higgs, Robert "Government
Protects Us?" The Independent Review, Fall
2002