|
More
Drilling, More Fish Hey wait a minute! We shouldn’t let a little clique of well-heeled, politically connected Florida voters hijack our national policy, right? This
shameless pandering by Republican politicians to a fringe group of highly
emotional Florida voters is a national scandal by now, right? It’s
high time these hot-heads in Florida got with the national program. They
need to shed their parochial obsessions and start assessing the national
interest soberly, and in light of current developments, not
stale policies enacted in the heat of hysteria almost half a
century ago. Enough of this tail wagging the dog stuff, right? Pinko
pundits and Democrats recite this like a mantra, right? But only about
Republicans pandering to Cuban-Americans, it seems. For
bald-faced pandering by the Bush brothers to a handful of
Florida hysterics, you can’t beat their decision in May to ban
oil drilling in the “Destin Dome.” But this time the Beltway media
lapped it up. Pinks and Greens always fancy themselves “progressives.”
Yet they’re still hung up on the Santa Barbara oil spill of 35 years
ago. The
drilling technology that gave us that (highly overblown) mess compares to
today’s like the Kitty Hawk compares to a jumbo jet. Market
forces, not meddlesome bureaucrats, account for cleaner, safer oil
drilling. A deep-water drilling rig might cost $1 billion. This thing has
to produce oil daily--hell, hourly!-- to recoup such a gargantuan
investment. A blowout and spill would shut them down for weeks. No oil
company could stay in business that way. "We
need oil rigs off the Florida beaches about as much as we need crack
houses next to our churches!" declared Florida Republican Ric Keller,
who represents Orlando in the U.S. House of Representatives. The Bush
brothers agreed. "A
worthy sequel!" gushed The New York Times about the decision
to buy back the oil leases (at taxpayer expense, naturally) and block oil
drilling in the Destin Dome off the Florida panhandle. “One can only
hope that the Florida proposals represent the beginning of a more diligent
effort to balance the country's energy needs with its environmental
imperatives.”
“It’s
enough to make a person wish President Bush's other brothers were in
politics, too!” cheered The Washington Post. Fact
is, there’s nothing hysterical about longing to preserve the most
gorgeous stretch of beach on the North American continent. Child,
adolescent and man I spent a good chunk of every summer on it. My parents
started making the five hour drive from New Orleans to the Miracle Strip
beaches in 1962. It
was well worth it. These beaches rivaled Varadero, the gorgeous beach east
of Havana where millions of Cubans cavorted every weekend--at least during
Cuba’s stint as a racist-fascist U.S. satrapy terrorized by crooks and
gangsters. The Cuban masses seethed and boiled under these daily
degradations, The New York Times assures us. Finally in 1959, the
lid exploded. Fidel
and his vanguard of the downtrodden rose in righteous fury. They were
inflamed by a patriotic fervor, Ted
Turner assures us. They promptly scotched the treasonous vermin
responsible for their nation’s shameful estate, stamped out their
wickedness and proclaimed Cuba “the first free country in the
Americas.” But
Rome wasn’t built overnight, and the process of social justice and
national liberation is often a long and arduous one. Alas, after 40 years
of progress, Varadero beach is now barricaded against Cubans by armed
police and reserved for rich foreigners, their local
footservants and prostitutes. Jimmy Carter, Ralph Nader and Barbara
Boxer are welcome. Cuban citizens are not. Varadero
is unquestionably “the most
beautiful beach in the world.” You’re better off wearing a Che Guevara
T-shirt to a Gloria Estefan concert than disputing this around
Cuban-Americans. Drive
the coastal highway from Pensacola to Panama City, Florida and you’ll
see the identical thing. Better yet, spend several weeks each
summer (like I do) lying on the sugary sand, or immersed in its
emerald waters. Take in the gorgeous sunsets while strolling the shoreline with a frosty margarita--it’s close to heaven. Plop
into a beach chair, pop a cold one and lean back. The gentle lapping of
waves serve as a soothing lullaby. Those beautiful white dunes rise behind
you. The sea oats wave softly in the breeze. The sun-dappled swells roll
and heave gently as they surge over the sandbar. They
finally break into white foam and envelop your sunburned legs in a
cool caress. Turn and look down the shoreline now. Ah,
more of that gentle bouncing and heaving, but sun-bronzed this time and
adorned with little tattoos. Time for the binoculars. Thank
you, Monica Lewinsky. Aren’t you seeing more thong bikinis on the beach
nowadays?--“AOOWW!! . . . . “Hi
Honey! Just checking for sharks! Like a good dad! The kids are fine. Go
back to your reading by the pool. Relax. I’ve got everything under
control down here.” Point
is, I love the place, especially the chronically charming and friendly
residents. We Louisianans cram those Panhandle beaches from Spring Break
to Labor Day. I’ve contributed as much to these
pressure groups that lobbied Bush to ban drilling as anyone; condo
rentals for weeks at a time, jet-skis, restaurant
meals--and let’s not even get into the booze bills during those
Disco-Era Spring Breaks. (Memo to MTV: You guys didn’t invent fun,
believe me.) Those blue-green waters and sugary sands covered in black malodorous goo evoke a horrific nightmare. But
here’s the crazy part: May's decision to ban drilling actually makes the
nightmare more likely. Forget
that we’re now more dependent on people like Prince Abdullah and
Chavez for energy. Assuming they deign to sell it to us, we’ll
need increasingly more, and we’ll need to keep transporting it
stateside--typically to refineries in Louisiana and Texas. This path takes
those tankers smack in front Florida’s panhandle beaches. Recall
the Valdez, the Cadiz, and the Argo Merchant. These were all tanker
spills. The production of oil is relatively clean and safe. The transportation
is the most dangerous part. Even
crazier, there’s a move in Florida for energy plants to start burning
clean natural gas instead of dirty coal. Excellent idea. According to The
Orlando Sentinel, “The coal-burning Crist plant in Pensacola itself
has been criticized as one of the nation's filthiest plants by the U.S.
Public Interest Research Group, which says the plant spews excessive
mercury and chemicals that cause smog, acid rain and lung damage.” Okay
fine, so where’s that natural gas to come from? Three trillion cubic
feet sit right off the coast in the Destin Dome. Ideal! And
of course this very Public Interest Research Group lobbied
energetically to ban its extraction! My
one complaint about Florida is the fishing. Compared to Louisiana’s,
Florida’s fishing is pathetic,
despite those (taxpayer-provided) offshore junkyards they call
“artificial reefs.” None come close-- as a fish magnet and factory--to
the (tax-revenue generating) artificial reefs banned from Florida’s
coastal waters last week. Go
ahead and scoff. The Travel Channel did, too. They got hold of a book
titled The Helldiver’s Rodeo that called Louisiana’s coastal
waters “the most prolific marine habitat in the world because,
not in spite, of offshore oil platforms.” They found the book
“fascinating and highly entertaining” and came down to film a show
about it, but still scoffed at the claims. These were Californians after
all, fashionably green in their environmental views. They
scoffed as we rode in from the airport. They scoffed over raw oysters,
grilled redfish and seafood Gumbo that night. More scoffing through the
Hurricanes at Pat O’Brien’s. They scoffed even while suiting up in
dive gear and checking the cameras as we tied up to an oil rig 20 miles in
the Gulf. But
they came out of the water bug-eyed. “Unreal! Amazing! Incredible!”
And that most California of terms: "AWESOME!" The
Travel Channel ran the show Memorial Day weekend. It was titled "Destination
Danger" and featured the undersea panorama around offshore oil
platforms. Schools of fish filled the screen constantly. They parted
slightly to make way for the divers. Huge amberjack lunged powerfully when
speared. They writhed violently as the diver wrestled them to the surface.
Schools of fish filled the water column from top to bottom--from six-inch
blennies to twelve-foot sharks. Fish by the thousands. Fish by the ton. The
cameras were going crazy. Do I focus on the shoals of barracuda? Or that
cloud of jacks? On the immense schools of snapper below, or on the fleet
of tarpon above? How ‘bout this--WHOOOAA!--hammerhead.
We
had some close-ups too, of coral and sponges, the very things disappearing
off Florida’s pampered reefs.
Off Louisiana, they sprout in colorful profusion from the huge steel
beams--acres of them. You’d never guess this was part of that unsightly
structure above. Louisiana,
with 3,200 offshore oil platforms off its coast, produces one third of
America’s commercial fisheries. And these reefs don’t cost the
taxpayers a thing. In fact, they offset
the state tax burden by millions of dollars a year. (By the way, I
don’t work for an oil company. I just love fishing, scuba diving,
seafood and facts.) Yet
Mark Ferrulo, a Florida “environmental activist” who hailed Bush's
decision, used the very example of Louisiana for his anti-offshore
drilling campaign, calling Louisiana's coast "the nation's
toilet." Florida’s
fishing fleet must love fishing in toilets then, and her restaurants
serving what’s in them. Most of the red snapper you eat in Florida
restaurants are caught around Louisiana’s oil platforms. We see the
Florida-registered boats tied up to them constantly.
Sometimes we can barely squeeze in. Yet
despite half a century of proof to the contrary in Louisiana and Texas,
EPA officials warned that drilling rigs would "harm essential
fish habitat and damage the fragile sea bottom in the Destin Dome." Here’s
the same EPA that slipped that “humans
are responsible for Global Warming” quackery to the media a few months
ago (probably while President Bush wasn’t looking). Makes you
wonder if the same clique wasn’t involved in this report about
“damaging fragile sea bottom.” Here’s
a few details the EPA won't tell you (much less the Beltway media): -
Urban runoff and treated sewage dump TWELVE TIMES as much petroleum into
the Gulf as the 5,000 oil production platforms. -
Oil seeping naturally through the ocean floor into the Gulf, where it
dissipates over time, accounts for SEVEN TIMES more than the amount
spilled by rigs and pipelines in any given year. The
Flower Garden coral reefs lie off the Louisiana-Texas border. Unlike any
of the Florida Keys reefs, they’re surrounded by dozens of offshore oil
platforms. These have been pumping away for
the past 40 years. Yet according to G.P. Schmahl, a federal biologist who
worked for decades in both places, “The Flower Gardens are much
healthier, more pristine than anything in the Florida Keys. It was a
surprise to me,” he admits. “And I think it's a surprise to most
people.” “A key measure of the health of a reef is the amount of area taken up by coral,” according to a report by Steve Gittings, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's science coordinator for marine sanctuaries. “Louisiana’s Flower Garden boasts nearly 50% coral cover . . . . In the Florida Keys . . . it can run as little as 5%.” The panorama under an offshore oil platform staggers the most experienced divers. I've seen divers fresh from the Cayman's Wall surface from under rig too wired on adrenalin to do anything but stutter and wipe spastically at the snot that trails to their chin. I've seen an experienced scuba-babe fresh from Belize climb out from under a platform gasping and shrieking at the sights and sensations, oblivious to the sights and sensation she was providing with her bikini top near her navel.
|