|
Death May Take a Holiday, But Taxes Never Do by Jef Allen You know, if the public servants we have in elected office weren’t so dangerous, they would be hilarious. What the hell, they’re hilarious anyway. What
prompts this observation? It’s the latest effort by Gov. Roy Barnes
and the State Legislature of Georgia at a government sponsored
“benefit cum social-engineering experiment”--the “Shop Georgia”
Sales Tax Holiday. The first tax
holiday period begins at 12:01 a.m. Friday, March 29 and continues until
midnight March 30, 2002. The second tax holiday period will begin at
12:01 a.m. Friday, August 2 and continue until midnight August 3, 2002. Ostensibly,
this exercise is an attempt on the part of the government of the State
of Georgia to stimulate the local economy by getting the shoppers out to
the stores. The stated purpose is to encourage the purchase of school
supplies, clothing, computers, etc. What results is a hilarious
hodge-podge of confusion that reads like legislation-by-lobbyist, with
all the proper class warfare issues duly taken into consideration. It
shows a government that is so fearful of actually missing any tax
revenue that it couldn’t simply offer a general tax amnesty period.
Instead, it was compelled to publish a convoluted guide as to what is
and isn’t eligible for the tax exemption that resembles a tax code
primer. From
the Georgia
Department of Revenue press release dated March 5, 2001 comes the
following, quoted verbatim: "These sales tax holidays will help Georgia families save money on many of the items they need," said Georgia Revenue Commissioner T. Jerry Jackson. "However, there are some limitations and special features, which are important for the shopping public to understand.
The
average shopper will need a tax attorney with them just to figure out
whether an item qualifies or not. In reality, the burden of making that
determination will fall to the retailers, who have had to sort through
this mess beforehand. One can just envision the checkout counter delays
as shoppers are told that item A qualifies, while item B does not. The
truly perverse aspect of this is the arbitrariness of it all. A computer
accessory purchased with a computer (not to exceed $1500) will qualify
for the exemption, but the same accessory purchased by a consumer who
already has a computer and doesn’t need a new one this weekend, does
not. Why,
you might ask? Obviously, the government wants its citizens to buy new
computers (not to exceed $1500, of course). In the same manner, they
want you to buy shoes (without cleats) and clothing (not to exceed $100
per item), but not umbrellas or wallets. Why do they really care what
you spend the money on anyway? Isn’t a dollar spent on a handbag just
as good as a dollar spent on a jacket? Why is a single $21 school item
taxable on the last dollar, but two $20 dollar items slide under the bar
with no tax? In a detail that borders on the truly bizarre, the NBC
affiliate in Atlanta pointed out in their March 29, 2002 nightly news
broadcast that standard metal paper clips were tax exempt, but colored
ones were not. What kind of tortured logic is that? What sort of
pathetic bureaucrat does it take to make that distinction for the
purpose of levying taxes? Some
might think that they really want you to buy all of it, but they just
can’t let go of the tax revenue on all but the narrowly defined,
pre-selected government approved items, and that, once in the store, the
shopper will spend anyway because they are clueless as to what does, or
doesn’t, actually qualify. It’s really just a scheme to bait
shoppers into accelerated spending, with only the best planners
realizing any significant savings. Of
course, that could never be the case. Only a cynic would think that. Jef Allen is a technology professional living in Georgia. He has a "zero-tolerance" policy toward political correctness, the coerced redistribution of wealth, central planning wonks, and people who actually think we are winning the "war on drugs." |