|
Don't Answer the Census
May 8, 2009 If
you’re already familiar with Lysander Spooner’s “No Treason IV: The
Constitution of No Authority,” then you know that the U.S. Constitution
isn’t even worth the paper it’s printed on.
This becomes all the more visible when you bear witness to how
selectively government either enforces or doesn’t enforce it, based on
whatever happens to be to the advantage of those who work for it.
That said, here’s what that worthless document has to say about a
census: “Representatives
and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may
be included within this Note
that the clause in question speaks only of an “Enumeration” – i.e.,
the total number of people living in a given geographical region.
It says precisely nothing about the ethnicity of said people, their
occupations, level of earnings, or how many toilets happen to be in their
home. It says nothing about
whether you own pets, have a medical condition, or are a certain age.
It means how many people live where you do.
Period. End of story.
But somewhere along the line, some group of smartass politicians
decided that wasn’t good enough. And
as if it wasn’t, note that the CON-stitution (capital letters quite
deliberate) states that the sole two purposes of such an enumeration are
to a.) provide for the election of the constitutionally appropriate number
of congressmen to the U.S. House of Representatives based on each
“State’s” population, and b.) to properly apportion any direct taxes
amongst the populace. I
can’t and wouldn’t want to speak for you, but I would consider the
complete and total absence of all congressmen a blessing, and so could
care less about the “state” I allegedly live in being “properly”
represented in a governmental body. I
don’t vote and never want to. So
this is a less than useless provision. As
for the second part, in case anyone hasn’t noticed, we’re already the
victims of several unapportioned direct taxes – “income” and
“Social Security” being the two big ones.
Allegedly the 16th “Amendment” changed any and all
apportionment requirements. There
is much evidence to suggest that this is total bullshit, but that’s
largely academic. The truth
is, government does as it damn well pleases, and you’d better pay up,
sit down, and shut up if you don’t want to lose everything you own,
spend your life in a cage, or get shot.
Those are your current options in lovely Amerika.
Isn’t freedom great? That’s
about it. Unless you have a
different idea, I can’t see one legitimate
reason to respond to the census – in 2010, or ever.
The government admits that it largely uses the data to determine
where and what kinds of federal subsidy revenues to send out, and I for
one do not wish to help them accomplish this task.
I don’t wish to help them accomplish anything, in fact, except
total self-immolation. I just
want to try and be somewhere nondescript and out of the way when it
happens. I have no desire to
go up with them. The
bureaucrats say a $100 federal fine can be imposed upon anyone failing or
refusing to answer the census. The
odds of such a fine actually being levied against an anonymous resister
are next to nil, however. As
an example, who have you heard of being prosecuted for failure to register
with Selective Service since the late 1960s and the days of Dr. Benjamin
Spock – even though the Selective Service System states to the present
that failure to do so among young men aged 18 to 25 is a felony?
In
the name of what’s both productive, and protective of what little
privacy I have, I’ll take my chances.
Here’s hoping you will too. Government
is completely illegitimate; totally out of control and running wild.
Don’t help these bastards control our lives any more than you
absolutely, positively must at
gunpoint. Don’t cooperate
with evil. Don’t
answer the Census. Alex R. Knight III is the author of numerous horror, science-fiction, and fantasy tales, including Victoria's Place and Other Tales of Terror. He has also written and published poetry; non-fiction articles, reviews, and essays for a variety of venues; and is former Communications Director for the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire. In 1998, he was awarded Activist of the Year for that organization. He now lives and writes in rural southern Vermont where he is currently an undergraduate at Union Institute and University, seeking a B.A. in Writing & Literature. In addition, he is a regularly featured guest on Marc Stevens' The No-State Project, and looks forward to living in a governmentless society of liberty. |