|
It's
Time to Get Passionate About Not Voting
by
Stewart Browne
Exclusive
to STR
March
24, 2009
In the Internet we see our greatest hope for freedom and for the
continual progress of humanity. In the Internet we see the anachronistic
and obsolete institutions of society being pushed aside for a new dawn of
better things. ~ Eric
Garris, 2005.
1
- Your Own Personal Bailout
A
thought experiment for libertarians: Imagine that circumstance has
left you heavily exposed to one of the high profile business implosions
we're seeing every day. Maybe a few years ago you put a good
chunk of change in Bank of America bonds, when they were AAA rated and
looked as secure as cash. Maybe you've spent decades as an
engineer at GM, and your salary and investment portfolio are heavily tied
to the fate of that company. Maybe you were inspired as a teen
by the "money is the root of all good" speech in Atlas
Shrugged, you moved to
New York
to be among the skyscrapers, and
climbed the ladders of finance until you landed a job at Bear Stearns or
Lehman.
What
would you do when the bailout train came rolling your way?
Extend
the experiment a bit further. You married your high school
sweetheart. You bought a house. You had kids. They
are counting on you to bring home the paycheck, especially now that times
are tough and there are no jobs to be had. If your company goes
under, your family will be ruined.
The
economy is tanking all around you. You're watching as all sorts of
people are getting handouts of taxpayer money. You need for Bank of
America to get a bailout or else you will lose your shirt on those bonds.
You need GM to get an "emergency loan" or else you are out of a
job.
But
you're a libertarian. You understand just how destructive these
bailouts are. You know they are morally reprehensible. They
are against everything you think you stand for.
Maybe
you tell your friends that you don't want any bailout money. But
what do you secretly want in your heart? Do you really wish the
government would leave your company to fail? Do you really want to
be denied your own bailout?
To
all libertarians, I now pose the dilemma of Your Own Personal Bailout:
If you could vote for or against a nice big government check written
specifically for you, on a secret ballot, knowing full well that every day
people all around you are voting to take large chunks of taxpayer change
for themselves, what would you do?
This,
in a nutshell, is the problem with democracy. It is also why we
advocates of liberty will never bring about lasting change via electoral
politics.
2 - The Real Digital Revolution
Amazon
and eBay, plane tickets and stocks, Facebook, iTunes, Wikipedia, Google,
Smart Phones, Telecommuting, and a whole lotta free porn -- in the
beginning (1993) we knew that the Internet's growth from a military tool
to a worldwide mass communication device was revolutionary. Here we are.
The revolution has arrived.
While the business schools and Thomas Friedmans of the world see the
digital revolution in terms of changing methods of business and
communication, those who look at a higher level, at how the digital
revolution has changed our very ideas and thoughts, are all reaching the
same conclusion. The Internet is making society much more
libertarian.
Again from Eric Garris in 2005:
Whereas
the establishment media echoed the administration line about weapons of
mass destruction during the run-up to the
Iraq
war, the Internet was bursting with
dissent and exposure of the lies. Whereas the imbedded establishment media
are dependent upon the good graces of the emperor and his cabinet, the
Internet is saturated with independent thought and criticism....And the
truth is winning, and the Internet is winning in the market of information
and news media.
The
history of modern libertarianism in
America
can be neatly divided into two parts:
before and after the Internet. Before the Internet, libertarians
communicated in newsletters and mail order catalogs, they gathered
infrequently in select locations, and their most effective tool for
getting the word out was the Libertarian Party. Now, in the
post-Internet age, libertarian views are expressed on websites with
extraordinarily wide readerships, libertarians form social networks on the
web, they dominate the political debate in the blogosphere.
That last part is most important. The Internet is the world's
decentralized way of organizing all its information, and because it is
market driven, the best, most useful information rises to the top.
At one time, libertarian thought was so shut out of the mainstream that
wealthy businessmen tried to form a network of free market think tanks so
there would at least be something to counter the leftists who owned all of
academia and the media.
Now, thanks to the Internet, it is readily clear to all thinking Americans
that the Federal Reserve is the primary cause of our current financial
crisis, that the War in Iraq is based on lies, that the War on Drugs is a
monumental failure. As of this writing, Meltdown
by Tom Woods is #12 on the NY Times Bestseller List and sales of Atlas
Shrugged are through the roof. Rick Santelli's
libertarian rant from the floor of the Chicago Exchange not only happened
on national television, but went viral on the Internet.
The sheer act of going onto the Internet and writing down our ideas for
others to see, of participating in a debate from which we were excluded
before the Internet, has caused an explosive growth in the libertarian
movement. From an article last fall in Reason
:
In
1970, the Harris Poll asked Americans, “Regardless of how you may vote,
what do you usually consider yourself—a Republican, a Democrat, an
Independent, or some other party?” Fully 49 percent of respondents chose
Democrat, and 31 percent called themselves Republicans. In 2007, the
latest year for which data is available, those figures were 35 percent for
Democrats and 26 percent for Republicans. The only real growth market in
politics is voters who decline political affiliation, and the only
political adjective seemingly gaining in popularity is…libertarian.
One
would think that the strength of libertarianism online would translate
into more libertarianism in our politics.
It
hasn't. While anonymous individuals of the libertarian persuasion continue
to crush ideological opponents in comment threads and
message boards all over the web, libertarian ideas continue to get
crushed in
Washington
.
Why is that?
3 - How did you answer the personal bailout question?
For
decades, the mantra throughout the libertarian movement has been
"educate the people." Libertarians believed that change
would come when enough people had seen the light, and our primary job was
simply to spread the word. A critical mass would come about, and
Americans would elect politicians who worked to reduce government and
protect our freedoms.
In
a 2006 Zogby poll, 59% of voters identified themselves as fiscally
conservative and socially liberal. 44% were willing to describe
their views as libertarian. Earlier this month, a Fox News poll
found that the majority of Americans think the federal government is too
big today, and by a 20 percentage point margin, Americans would rather pay
lower taxes and have a smaller government rather than pay higher taxes for
larger government.
Is
the problem that Americans still don't understand the power of free
markets?
Six in ten Americans opposed the first auto bailout, but it passed.
Americans were strongly opposed to the first $700 billion bailout and
called their Congressmen in unprecedented numbers to oppose it, but it
passed. A majority of Americans are unhappy with the wars in the
Middle East
, and elected Obama in large part out of
that opposition. Since his election, he has increased troop levels
in
Afghanistan
and increased funding to
Israel
for their own war effort in
Gaza
.
We've reached a critical juncture in the history
of libertarianism. That Holy Grail of libertarianism, educate the
people, has been happening to great effect, but our government is
growing faster than ever! Sure, the dinosaurs still herd together in
places like DailyKos, universities, and
Massachusetts
, but their numbers are rapidly shrinking
relative to ours. The Internet has blown open the debate and in just
a few years libertarians have torn down centuries of bad ideas and
outright lies, leaving the plain truth available for anyone to see, and it
is quite clear that people do see it. It is quite clear that people
want to elect politicians to achieve it.
But even when
America
votes for a smaller government, they get a
larger one. Even when millions of us call our representatives and
demand they vote for smaller government, they vote for larger government.
Throughout the land, large and growing numbers of people from all
demographics now understand the value of freedom and free markets.
What they don't understand is that voting is not going to get them there.
This simple insight goes against everything they've been taught since
childhood. It asks people to step entirely outside of the political
debate and question whether there is anything to debate at all. It
asks an ordinary, socially acceptable Constitutionalist to become a free
market radical.
4 - How Do We Get From Here To There
I have for you a rare but real sliver of optimism in these dark times.
Yes, government is growing faster than ever. Yes, Congress and the
Federal Reserve are growing more destructive every day. Yes, it
feels like we libertarians have accomplished nothing.
But we're actually quite close, and the Internet has given us the tools we
need to finish what we've started.
No, I'm not about to take you on a "crypto anarchist" rant.
From Jim Bell's "Assassination Politics" to John Perry Barlow's
"Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace," I am aware I am
just the latest in a long line of libertarians claiming the Internet can
save us.
Via the Patriot Act and other legislation, the government has effectively
put off the day when strong encryption allows us all to conduct our
business in private and bring about our dream society. What I see
libertarians doing to great effect is just the opposite. Instead of
rabidly seeking out privacy (one of our favorite words), libertarians are
using the Internet to turn up the volume on their message. As
explained above, the message is getting out there. The only reason
it hasn't worked yet is that we are shouting at
Washington
, and
Washington
is incapable of listening.
But in the midst of all that shouting, we've accomplished an important
first step. Even though libertarians are losing in the public policy
arena, they are winning the public policy debate. A rapidly
expanding number of Americans want and understand the need for smaller
government. Change will happen when those Americans understand that
they cannot shrink the government at the ballot box.
In 2008, libertarians showed they are capable of causing a real stir.
The Ron Paul campaign, with its record fundraising, its widespread and
spontaneous grass-roots support, the huge, enthusiastic turnout at rallies
around the country, was unlike anything I've ever seen in libertarian
activism.
Yes, it all fizzled out when it came time to vote in the primaries, and
that's precisely the point. How could Ron Paul possibly get
anywhere telling voters in
Iowa
that he was opposed to agricultural subsidies,
telling old people in
New Hampshire
that the entitlements were bankrupt, telling
autoworkers in
Michigan
and
Ohio
that he was in favor of free trade?
Even people who understand that liberty is best cannot resist the lure of
their own personal bailout.
That is why libertarians must stop making the case that we need our
politicians to shrink the government, and must start making the case that
our government is a hopeless enterprise that cannot be reformed until it
is first abandoned.
I can hear some of you now...I make this case all the time, I've
been making this case for years, you say.
Make it more! And leave the philosophical arguments for later.
The non-voting libertarians won the ethical debate years ago, but the
voting libertarians are still more numerous and visible because they want
to get out there and do something. We need to share the
difficult truth with these people that their efforts in the political
arena are hopeless. We need to remind them that libertarians have
already won the hearts and minds of
America
and still
Washington
grows. We need to explain to Libertarian
Party types that the most powerful force in a democracy is not the will of
the people, it is the phenomenon of your own personal bailout.
Imagine if the energy, organization, and money behind the 2008 Ron Paul
campaign were instead focused on an educational effort about why
government can never do anything except grow, about why it truly doesn't
matter if it's McCain or Obama or Palin or Clinton or Republican or
Democrat, about how even the most intelligent, principled man in
Washington must insert earmarks into every bill to hold onto his seat.
Imagine a blimp flying across the country bearing the message "Don't
Vote."
These are efforts that would move us toward a free society, and we're much
closer than we’ve ever been. The financial crisis has put tens of
millions of Americans in a desperate place, where they now understand that
the way we've been doing things is severely flawed. Washington's
response, with tens of trillions of new debt, trillions more in new money
being printed, bailouts for bankrupt megacorporations and witch hunts when
the executives take the money, all the while, nary a word about the
entitlements bomb that lurks in the distance -- these things are
undermining the stability of our society, and in response, we are
witnessing the rise of an increasingly authoritarian state.
Americans are baffled by this, thinking they elected Obama precisely to
halt the creeping fascism they saw under Bush. Some of us know that
the government grows and our freedoms shrink not because some devious man
is orchestrating his own dictatorship, but because it is the nature of
government to grow, period.
When the rest of the world understands this too, maybe then we can finally
figure out how to get off our current road to ruin, and give no one else
the chance to vote for their own personal bailout.
|