|
The Loopy Dynamics of Feedback (The
idea of "authority" is a lie to justify oppression.) by NonEntity Exclusive to STR August 12, 2008 For
every action (force) in nature, there is an equal and opposite
reaction; this is As
humans, each of us is an individual actor.
The actions we take cause reactions. We must deal with them.
It's the nature of reality.
One learns early in life that poking a hornet's nest with a
stick is not a good idea. This
is not a difficult concept, it would seem.
But then, what seems is often far from what is. Take,
for instance, the idea that it is perfectly legal for you to be shot
for not buying a tag for your dog.
Sounds extreme, doesn't it?
But it is the standard practice almost anywhere in the Here
is how it works. Some
people got together and decided that they wanted you to have a
license on your dog. They
were probably afraid something bad might happen and thought they
could control their world against such possibility.
They may have asked your opinion about this idea but they
probably did not. Most
likely they just decided what they wanted to do, wrote it down, and
called it a law. They
probably published it somewhere and this made them think that their
idea was now somehow or other applicable to you, regardless of what
you and your dog thought about the whole matter.
("Stroke
of the pen, law of the land. Pretty
cool!" – President Clinton’s aide, Paul Begala)
As Marc Stevens has so aptly described it, “law” is nothing
more than opinion backed by force. If
you are any kind of self-respecting individual, you probably would
say to yourself, "What utter foolishness these pompous asses
have written. I am
certainly not going to pay any attention to the insane ramblings of
such lunatics," and would go on about the business of your
life. But let us suppose
that your small-minded neighbor gets it in her mind that you are not
subservient enough to the ideas of tyranny and she calls the petty
bureaucrat in charge of doggy (and owner) subjugation.
The cops come out and tell you that there are some opinions
that someone somewhere wrote down on a piece of paper that say that
you are supposed to number your doggie friend.
If you, as I hope you would, tell these fools-in-costume that
you have no intention whatsoever of putting a number on your dog and
furthermore would they please get-the-hell-out-of-your-yard-and-face
before you get pissed off . . . well, it might get ugly.
And when you continue to assert your choice to be left alone
to peaceably life your life with your un-numbered canine companion,
who is also peaceably minding his or her own business, the cops are
going to get unruly and pull their guns on you demanding that you
hand over the dog, at the very least.
If you then pull out your Glock
in an attempt to prevent the kidnapping of said peaceful canine
companion, all hell will break loose and you and your dog will be
riddled with more bullets than would be needed to take over some
small countries. You
could avoid this, of course, by doing what they say in the first
place. But keep in mind
what the reality is. These
people, and probably most of your neighbors as well (otherwise it
never could have gotten this far), believe that it is acceptable to
shoot you if you refuse to follow their stupid idea that your dog
should have a number mechanically attached to his body at all times
(or whatever other silly things someone decided to write down on
paper somewhere). It's
not like you or the dog have threatened anyone and there is cause
for their actions. No.
It's just an idea they had that they thought would be nice for you to obey.
(Need I point out that you are similarly numbered and
catalogued? And that the reality is that this is about you, and not
about your dog?) They
can and will kill you over this.
"You
will be numbered!" Know
why? Because they can.
Know why? Because
somehow or other the great ideasphere has gotten this idea that
there are some people who are not responsible for their actions. Think
about it. If your nosy
neighbor had come over demanding that you attach a device to your
pet, and you told her exactly where she could shove her idea and
device, and then she shot you--she would go away for a long, long
time. It would be in the
daily fishwrappers and on the viewscreen and everyone would be
talking about it. On the
other hand, if you defend yourself against such an unwarranted
intrusion into your life by armed thugs in costumes (or not!),
demanding exactly the same thing, you will be shot--and everyone
will comment what a dangerous person you were, and how good it is
that you are no longer alive to endanger the neighborhood.
Your killers will get a few days paid vacation and then will
have to go back to work being thugs for hire.
With no responsibility for their actions.
(Lon Horiuchi, who shot and killed Vicki Weaver and her baby
in cold blood, got a medal! He then went on to be a part of the team
at Oh,
but they're not thugs, some may say.
Well think about this: If
a warrant for your arrest is made, and you attempt to resist--you
attempt to prevent the intrusion into your life by armed thugs--you
can and very likely will be shot,
regardless of the underlying cause.
It could be something as simple as an unpaid parking ticket,
or the failure to license your dog.
The cops don't care. They
are only hired thugs whose job is enforcement of the petty dictates
of others. They will
kill you over a parking ticket.
They are currently called law enforcement officers, after
all; we no longer appear to have peace officers.
They are not responsible for assuring that their actions are
appropriate to the level of crime alleged.
Nope, failure to bow to their commands is punishable by
death. That is the
bottom line. It is not
about justice, it is about control. In
any rational reality there would be some kind of reciprocity between
the actions of humans in relations with each other.
Somewhere along the line there arose the idea of “sovereign
immunity.” And even
though we realized a couple of centuries ago that the idea of
"sovereigns" having power over others is really, really
stupid, we still think it is all right for hired thugs to be
completely devoid of any responsibility for their actions.
Amazing. "Lord"
Think
about the surly "public servant" that you frequently
encounter at the DMV or the People
have died in holding pens because
they didn't kowtow to the TSA and similar dynasties.
And you know what? No
one was put in jail for these murders.
The clerk at the DMV knows that if you don't play his or her
game, you will end up on the side of the road looking down the
barrel of a "service" weapon.
You don't see clerks at Nordstrom’s or Wal-Mart providing
this level of service, do you? If
you drove a taxi, and your potential customer refused to allow you
to strip search and fondle him or her prior to your accepting them
as a fare, and you locked them up in a room and they died, you would
go to jail for that. Deservedly.
And for a long time. The
idea that anyone is not responsible
for his actions is a license to kill.
A civilized society cannot exist with such an idea.
Actions have consequences.
It may appear that they don't.
It may appear that individuals parading as cops are above the
law. They're not.
They, too, are just people.
What is happening is that the scale is becoming severely out
of balance. Just as it
has taken almost 100 years since the creation of fraudulent
"money" by the Federal Reserve Banks for the united States
economy to collapse, so too it will be with petty tyrants.
Remember Rome?
Or the For
every action, an equal and opposite reaction.
We need to take this seriously before the scale is so far out
of balance that only the total destruction of society can right it.
At least, if you want to live in a civilized society where
you get as good as you give, and you need not fear those who believe
they can do anything for they are "above" the law.
Each of us creates this reality by believing it.
If you believe that others are superior to you and that
they have the right to control you, then you make that real. These
tyrants only exist because you and I allow them to.
Think
about this. Is this the
kind of world you want to pass on to your children?
It really is up to each one of us.
We each must understand that it is not acceptable civilized
behavior for some people to tell others how to run their, our,
lives. We have no one to
blame but ourselves. Do
not go gently into tyranny. This is our world. These are our lives. Let's remember that and start to act as though our lives matter. They do. There
is no "authority."
It is your life, not someone else's.
I
bid you peace and love. References
you may want to pursue:
Marc
Stevens has written a great book called Adventures in Legal Land
which is available at his
site along with articles, discussions and a weekly radio
program called “The No-State Project” Saturdays on We
The People Radio Network. Ian
and Marc host a wonderful thought provoking radio talk show where
you can call in about literally anything, but where the ideas of
liberty predominate: Free
Talk Live SamIAm
has created a marvelous video of his attempts to find justice within
a |