|
Night by Jim Davies
December 29, 2008 There's
a very remarkable short book I recommend, called simply Night. It
tells in the first person what happened to a young boy after he and his
family were taken to After
a grueling train trip, everyone was segregated by gender and Elie waved
farewell to his mother and three sisters. The two elder ones survived, as
he did; his mother and little Tzipora did not. There was then a further
segregation or "selection" before which a fellow prisoner had
whispered that he should lie when questioned: to say his age was 18, not
15, and that his father's was 40, not 50. They did so lie, and he
therefore survived; his father died from exhaustion a few weeks before
war's end. The
first tragedy of Night is that these appalling events are being
forgotten. Elie was an unusually religious boy and had faith that God
would protect His people but, after being transported to Auschwitz and
then Buna and then Buchenwald and watching other boys being publicly
hanged, says he became not so much an unbeliever as profoundly angry with
God, that He could allow such terrible things to happen. Religion is
powerful stuff.
Every
page is telling, but the one that I best recall related the earlier return
to his village of an old man who had escaped from an earlier transport
train. He went round telling everyone he could make listen, about the
horrors he had seen. And they, his fellow Jews, did not believe him. They
thought he had gone mad. In 1943, they dismissed his tales of mass
executions. His warning was not heeded . . . until it was too late. And
even today, there are those who don't believe them, or who simply do not
know what it was all about.
It
was one of the most brutal exterminations in human history, committed by
agents of the government of a people just as civilized as ours and almost
as democratic; and now, the memory of it is slipping away. I cannot
express how deeply tragic that is. Others have said that those who fail to
learn the lessons of history are condemned to repeat it. I fear they may
be right.
The
second tragedy arising is that by relentless propaganda in its schools and
the media that it licenses, government has conveyed the impression that
the German Nazis of the 1940s are somehow qualitatively different from
Americans 60 years later. They are not--yet even Elie
Wiesel's profoundly moving book fails to identify the Nazi persecutors
as ordinary politicians.
It
continues, in other words, to convey the sad fiction that Hitler and his
brutal gang were a one-time phenomenon, barely-human mutants, devils
incarnate. This fiction was first used by virtually all Germans after
WWII, when news of the atrocities was broadcast: We had no idea; this was
done by Hitler, not by us, etc. By "isolating" government,
ordinary voters, eleven million of whom had placed power in Hitler's
hands, could separate themselves from what he did.
But
it doesn't stop there: this notion that the Nazis were sub-human has
served every government everywhere ever since. At the very time that they
do many of the things the Nazis did, they hold heads high and say "we
are not like them."
All
And,
like the Nazis but even more cleverly, they use their schools and license
the media to control nearly all that We the People see, hear, read and
believe. Will
history repeat; will they conduct a new holocaust, or wage a new war? I
don't think they have mass extermination in mind. Eradicating Jews
was always implicit in the NSDAP election platforms, though never of
course explicit; Jews were blamed for the traumatic loss of WWI and that
party traded skillfully on centuries of low-level anti-Semitic sentiment.
Until 1942, however, the policy was to export Jews from the Reich, not to
enslave and then exterminate them; the invention of the gas chambers was
cobbled together in mid-war, when expatriation was no longer feasible and
execution squads in newly-conquered territory were too inefficient. Today
in this country, I cannot think of any identifiable group that the ruling
clique has blamed for our misfortunes (though directors of major finance
companies might want to keep their passports current), so I doubt that
such a horror is in plan. War,
on the other hand, is always the health of the state, and Obama may well
resort to it, in a second term if not the first, so as to distract
attention from his inevitable failure to restore economic health. I was
reminded recently by an article on Nazi
Economics that they, for all their bombast, did not seek war as a
primary objective but by the end of the 1930s, they had only two options:
expansive war, so as to steal the resources they needed, or else recession
(and therefore loss of prestige and power) for want of vital supplies they
could no longer afford to import. Even then, as I read history the 1939
declaration in So
yes, I can't guess what form it will take or where it will be fought, but
it would not at all surprise me if another major war began five or ten
years from now. Anyone with sons now aged 5 or more would therefore do
well to keep them hidden, or to plan for them an escape route to whatever
country takes on the 1970s role of Jim Davies is a retired businessman in New Hampshire who led the development of an on-line school of liberty in 2006, who expects to experience a free society in his lifetime, and who in 2008 wrote the books "A Vision of Liberty" and " Transition to Liberty." |