|
Fox News: Bhutto Attacked by Killer Tiger from San Francisco January 2, 2008 On
the morning of Benazir Bhutto’s assassination, I sat oblivious to
world events in a small restaurant/bar in I
sat shocked at the news of the former prime minister’s death.
The bartender, who had looked up occasionally, asked me, “Wait,
how did the tiger get to Pakistan?” I looked at him.
Humbled with disbelief, I put my head in my hand and replied,
“I don’t know. Super
tigers?” The
confusion of a man working in a bar that has Fox News on the television
24/7 does not surprise me. In
a country where barely half of the citizens could point to What
did surprise me was that the only time I saw the name President Musharraf
on television that morning was when Fox News mentioned that President
Bush had called Musharraf to offer “his condolences.”
All across the board, the major media networks had placed the
Pakistani President in some kind of role of reluctant authority, as if
he were saddened by Bhutto’s murder. Yet,
when I turned on NPR later that day, Musharraf’s name was mentioned in
a different light – mentioned by people actually IN Afterwards,
NPR’s All Things Considered
talked to a friend of Bhutto’s, Mark Segal, a lobbyist in Washington,
who had received an email from Bhutto only weeks before her death.
She had professed, after the attacks intended for her in October
were unsuccessful, that the government was failing to adequately ensure
her safety, and that Musharraf and elements of his intelligence
community were somehow intentionally denying her security.
In other words, Bhutto herself felt that the government would
play a role in her death. After
all, as Rashid pointed out on Fresh
Air, it was Musharraf, who, after the bombings in October, declared
emergency rule, suspended the constitution, removed Supreme Court
judges, put Bhutto under house arrest and most importantly, moved the
election from the fall to January. Bush
may as well have given Musharraf a high-five. In
the days that ensued, everyone from members of the Pakistan People’s
Party to Pakistani cricket stars came out and said the government was
somehow involved. It was
Musharraf’s government who stood to lose the most from a
democratically elected Bhutto. Even
the other opposition leader, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif,
declared he would not participate in the upcoming election, evidence
that he also believes the government is dangerously corrupt. Meanwhile,
Pakistani government officials have since said the attack was an act of
terrorism by radical members of the Taliban and al-Qaeda – two
organizations that have become the go-to names when bad things happen.
9/11? Al-Qaeda!
Spain
bombings?
Al-Qaeda! Bhutto
assassination? Al-Qaeda!
Killer tiger? Al-Qaeda! It
is clear what will happen from here.
The Pakistani government will continue to blame the assassination
on terrorism, while the Pakistan People’s Party will continue to
allege that the government was complicit, but the truth about Bhutto’s
assassination will not be discovered.
The We
must make an effort to find what many in Travis Irvine is a filmmaker, journalist, activist, comedian and recent politician who resides in the Washington, D.C. area. He recently ran for mayor of his hometown, Bexley, Ohio, endorsed by both the Libertarian and Green Party. His website is www.americanmayor.biz. |