|
Hating Bush
July 10, 2007 I’m
perplexed by anyone who still hates I
actually didn’t hate Bush right away. I didn’t like him or respect
him. He was the president, after all. But I didn’t loathe him the way I
did After
9/11, I told my friends I was glad But
after a while, something happened. Maybe it was the prescription drug
program, which on one fell swoop expanded the welfare state more than Maybe
it was the war in Maybe
it was the massive credit expansion, borrowing and other forms of hidden
taxes. Or
the FBI spying on war protestors. Or the whole color-coded alert system
and its use as a political tool. Or the Anthrax investigation that ended
once it couldn't be pinned on an easy Muslim scapegoat. Maybe
it was the steel tariffs or the attempts to socialize the stock market and
force me to pay into a "private account," all while still
indirectly taxing me for current Social Security beneficiaries — and all
in the name of market reform. Maybe
it was the proposed TIPS program and Total Information Awareness. Maybe it
was the Patriot Act and the end of the Fourth Amendment. Or maybe it was
the rise of renditioning, whereby non-terrorists caught in the wrong place
at the wrong time have been sent overseas to have their genitals sliced,
and to endure other similarly barbarous treatment. Maybe
it was Bush's snide reference to "political capital," his
insistence that as president, he didn't have to answer to anybody, his
confidence that he alone is The Decider and his boastfulness of the fact
that, being a war president, he always has war on his mind. Maybe
it was Sarbanes-Oxley. Bush has claimed responsibility for the most
comprehensive corporate regulation since FDR. Or maybe it was his doubling
of the Department of Education. Perhaps
it was the expansion of the federal government by more than 50% since Perhaps
it was Bush's refusal to veto practically anything, other than a stem cell
bill — though he said he'd veto a bill to arm airline pilots and any
restrictions on his war spending —
or his endless use of signing statements by which he insists he doesn't
have to follow any part of the law he doesn't like. Maybe it was the
unitary executive doctrine, espoused by his Attorney General, that
essentially claims he's dictator of the world. Maybe
it was his signing of McCain-Feingold, which he admitted was
unconstitutional. Or
it could have been the nationalization of airport security, such that a
harmless person was shot dead at the Perhaps
it was the amplification of the drug war, the medical marijuana raids, the
jailing of bong manufacturers and the new ban on hemp products like
shampoos and birdseed – all under a regime headed by a man who probably
engaged in such "youthful indiscretions" himself. Or
perhaps it was the persecution of Martha Stewart – the typical example
of Republican hard-on-corporate-crime posturing, whereby relatively
deserving rich people are caged but Big Pharma’s CEOs and the defense
contractors for some reason never even have to worry about going under. It
could have been the Real ID Act. Or maybe it was the rounding up of all
those innocent people after 9/11 and depriving them of due process. Maybe
it was the NSA spying program. Or the attempts to create more and more
exceptions to Posse Comitatus so as to allow the military to be used
against Americans. Maybe it was the explosion of military-industrial
corporate welfare. Or Bush's smug, lying and smirking visage, on TV night
after night, reassuring us that he loves our freedom and the principles
laid out in the Constitution. Perhaps
it was that Bush said he'd do all he could to find the 9/11 killers, only
to turn around and close down the bin Laden Unit, ignore his intelligence
agencies, detain and abuse persons who were captured by the Northern
Alliance for a cash reward, and wage a war on a totally unrelated country,
out of some family grudge or corporate welfare interest or neocon dream or
something other than national security, to say nothing of human rights.
Maybe it was his repeated stonewalling of attempts to have a real 9/11
investigation. Or his refusal to testify under oath at such hearings, or
without Cheney there to help him. Maybe
it was the first time Habeas Corpus was expressly suspended since Abraham
Lincoln. Or
maybe it was the new dedication to explicitly Wilsonian foreign policy
goals that we started hearing in the State of the Union speeches and
Inaugural Address, with the implication that the Republicans have now
taken over where the Democrats left off under LBJ as the party most
devoted to reshaping the whole world via the Crusader State. Maybe
it was one of the times he or his administration lied about Or
maybe it was some combination of all these things, but at some point — I
don't know — I just started hating Bush and doubting his supposedly good
intentions. Anthony Gregory is a Research Analyst at The Independent Institute, a Policy Advisor at the Future of Freedom Foundation, and a columnist at LewRockwell.com. His website is AnthonyGregory.com.
|