|
Voluntaryism, the Free Society and Economic Diversification:
How a Voluntaryist Society Can Produce a Diverse Economy
by Christopher
Awuku
October
22, 2007
For
the past month, I have been residing in
Trinidad and
Tobago
in the
West Indies
, after deciding
to take a break from the
United Kingdom
.
Trinidad and
Tobago
has the largest
per capita income of all
Caribbean
countries and
benefits from reserves of fossil fuels, such as crude oil and natural
gas. However, in the past
few weeks, a number of companies in the energy sector have produced
audits denoting that
Trinidad and
Tobago
’s fossil fuel
reserves will last for only 12 more years.
The audits have caused concern since the economy of the country
is heavily dependent upon its deposits of oil and gas.
As a result, some political commentators have called for greater
fossil fuel exploration and more emphasis on economic diversification.
I’m
not a trained economist, but nonetheless I can see the advantage of
economic diversification. An
economy based on a variety of industries may better cope with constantly
changing global economic circumstances.
Imagine if an economy was predominantly based on agriculture.
Such an industry initially may provide jobs for people and bring
in revenue to a country, but what if a drought (or some other disaster)
occurred, which severely curtailed the ability to grow crops?
This hypothetical country would then risk economic ill-health as
a result, since unemployment would rise and fewer people would be
spending money on goods and services.
In a stateless society, evidently there would not be any
government controlling the economy.
So how would the economy in a voluntaryist society handle
changing economic conditions?
Finite
resources, infinite desires
The
basis of economics, as a study or science, is thus:
Resources
on the Earth are finite and human desires are infinite.
How then can we use the Earth’s finite resources to satisfy
infinite human desires?
It
is true that the natural resources of the Earth are finite.
It is also true that human desires are subjective and potentially
limitless. In order to
secure economic diversity, all that is necessary is to focus on the
relative desires of individuals. In
reality, little else is needed. I’m
an amateur student of the
Austrian
School
of economics.
As such, I tend to base economic activity from the premise of
human action, or methodological individualism.
Economic activity really should be subject to individual needs
and wants. By emphasising the unique desires of people, differing
industries can emerge based upon such relative longings.
In this sense, the law of supply and demand comes into play.
If the demand for a specific good or service exists within a
stateless society, then someone guided by self-interest will seek to
meet it, since he can stand to make money by catering to consumer
demands.
Regulations
on business
I
would presume that the regulations on business in
Trinidad and
Tobago
, akin to other
capitalist economies, are quite burdensome.
It is these regulations that make doing business taxing and
potentially deter people from becoming entrepreneurial.
Satisfying the unique requirements of individuals would be far
easier and simpler if all
regulations on business were repealed and abolished.
Once
the red tape is eliminated, business owners wouldn’t have to jump
through so many hoops, especially when it comes to establishing and
running their business enterprises.
One also shouldn’t have to appeal to the state in order to do
business. In effect, there
should be nothing to halt any
individual from literally starting a business in his own home or
acquiring any shop front and attempting to make money. However,
Trinidad
hasn’t escaped
the plague of big government, which exists elsewhere in the world.
Several weeks ago, Prime Minister and Finance Minister Patrick
Manning presented a budget that was chock full of large government sentiments.
Trinidad and
Tobago
has little hope
of successfully diversifying its economy if the scope and size of its
government continues to grow at a pace.
Conclusion
The
government of
Trinidad and
Tobago
has instituted a
policy goal that by the year 2020, it will officially be classified as a
First World
country.
Perhaps Mr. Manning believes that extra governmental spending
would aid in bringing forth that vision.
It must be stated that he would be wrong in thinking this.
Economic development exists as a result of the free market, since
government only acts as a parasite on the economy.
Think about it for a second.
The state does not create anything of its own merit.
It finances itself by forcibly extracting money from hard working
and productive members of society. This
is in direct contrast to the free market, which creates revenue by
producing goods and services tailored to the desires, needs and wants of
the everyday man.
The
benefits of a free market are evident to see.
Countries like
India
and
China
are advancing
economically because of the economic freedom enjoyed in each respective
state. They are attracting
business since companies recognise the increased simplicity in doing
commerce in these areas. Over
the past ten to fifteen years, countries of the G8 with more liberalised
economies have been more successful than states with excessive
regulations. The
USA
,
Canada
and the
United Kingdom
have experienced
higher rates of economic growth and lower unemployment than countries
such as
Japan
,
France
,
Germany
,
Italy
and
Russia
.
Even the ruling classes in these states have realised that
regulation isn’t the way forward.
In 2006, Angela Merkel was elected Chancellor of Germany with the
remit of reforming the German economy away from the traditional social
market model. Earlier this
year, Nicolas Sarkozy became the French president with much the same
charge.
If
Trinidad
is to realise its ambition of becoming a
First
World
country by 2020, then Mr. Manning should be taking measures to
liberalise the economy of
Trinidad
and Tobago
.
Such liberalisation would ensure that sufficient development can
take place to ensure
First
World
status, in addition to allowing the economy to healthily manage a
possible loss of fossil fuel revenue.
It is time that people outside the Western world started to
recognise that government is not the answer.
|