|
Don't Soil Yourself With Politics Exclusive to STR March 7, 2007 Thanks
to Angelo Mike for the stark reminder
of how ugly statism really is. It’s
terribly useful to read the firsthand account of someone who loves
liberty yet ventures into the very belly of the beast, I
know a wise old fellow who taught me that everything in life can be
poison or medicine. “My
First and Last Time” is a good example.
It’s easy to see the poison that is government, but taken in
the right dosage, it can be just what the doctor ordered. My
friend Tom is a longtime member of Alcoholics Anonymous, for which I
have the utmost respect. Sober
AA’s are some of the most open-minded, intelligent, warm, funny,
enjoyable people I’ve ever met. The
parallels between sobriety and liberty are appreciable.
Tom
has many times laid out for me the wisdom found in any life path that is
a “road less traveled.” In
other words, a commitment to any route which raises consciousness,
awareness and maturity, whether it is called sobriety or liberty, it can
bring one to the same end. Addiction
can be defined as the loss of the ability to choose (whether or not to
participate in the political process, for instance) or the tendency to
do the same things over and over while hoping for a different outcome
(e.g., voting). Most agree
that a person meets the criteria of addict when they cross the invisible
line between a casual user and one who cannot give up their drug of
choice no matter how destructive it becomes.
They often become convinced that they could give it up if
they wanted to or if they saw a need for it, they just don’t have the
desire. However you define
it, everyone knows a sick addict when they step over one lying on the
sidewalk. Think about the
people you know who are obsessed with voting.
Is any of the above applicable to them? Tom
has been sober for years. The
thing about having been so is that, rather than become judgmental or
revolted, he has learned to appreciate the usefulness of coming face to
face with an active alcoholic. By
the same token, we can appreciate the usefulness of active political
donkeys. Most display the
same pathetic loss of touch with reality, logic and integrity. When
Tom encounters a “wet” face, he appreciates his own life so much
more! “There but for the
grace of god go I,” he assures me.
Like a roaring bender, one trip to the belly of the beast reminds
us all of what awaits us should we allow ourselves to momentarily become
seduced by the idea that government is anything but a dangerous
parasite. A mature person
learns from the mistakes of others, so you don’t even have to make the
trip yourself! My
friend assures me that alcoholics spend a lot of time trying to figure
out how to again obtain the benefits of drinking without the problems.
Some think that relocation is the cure – drinking could work if
the drinker got a different job, or a different wife or lived in a
different state. Some try
substitutes for alcohol – painkillers, for instance, or retail
recovery (spend your way to bliss!).
I think it was Betty Ford who, in desperation, once drank rubbing
alcohol. They’ll try just
about anything to avoid stopping the merry-go-round that once seemed to
do the trick. The
“bottle” has been likened to an infant’s dependency on its mother,
and everyone knows what an unweaned, overgrown child is like.
People addicted to the idea of the democratic process are in the
same boat--they don’t want to grow up. Tom
summed it up for me once with this allegory.
A junkie (political or otherwise) thinks it is exciting to play
on train tracks. People tell
them that they shouldn’t because a train comes through every day and
it might run them over. A
junkie’s response is that the train won’t run him over
because he’s special. The
train that comes through every day will not only stop for him, but will
actually turn into Santa’s sleigh and bring him gifts.
How many times a given junkie will have to be left bloody and
broken by the side of the road before they accept the plain truth
varies. He has no one to
blame but himself for thinking that the facts don’t matter nearly as
much as his fantasies of how it ought to be. An
active alcoholic convinces themselves that alcohol (government) is not
the problem, that it is actually the solution!
If they can just learn to drink (vote) the right way, or select
the right beverage (party) in the right amount (local, state, fed), life
will stop hurting and start working well.
Good citizens are under the same delusion.
If only their man is elected, then life would start working well.
The fact that an alcoholic’s liver is rotting, just as a
citizen’s will towards self-responsibility and self-ownership does
when exposed to the nanny state, must be ignored in order to keep
“using.” Until
all options have failed and hitting bottom is painful enough, quitting
is out of the question. Often
alcoholics must go to the brink of death or insanity to stop.
It’s apparent that politics also kills, but not close enough to
home or often enough or to wake up the masses.
Most citizens are already past the brink of insanity, and it
doesn’t seem to bother them. If
the whole world is crazy, they fit right in and appear normal!
It reminds me of one of my Dad’s favorite lines: “In the land
of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.” I
have a tender spot in my heart for Dr. Ron Paul.
His words have many times given me hope for the survival of
mankind. He often tells the
inconvenient truth, refuses to vote for anything that does not pass the
Constitutional “sniff test” and possesses the rarest trait in a
politician – integrity. “Dr.
No” will never win a popularity contest on Capitol Hill because he
manages to piss off both sides of the (one) political coin in D.C – he
must be a good guy, right?! Part
of me is convinced that things would improve if he were elected
President. But really, how
is this different than the alcoholic who thinks if he just tries some
conscious drinking that he can make alcohol work for him once again?
You don’t want to wind up bloody and broken on the side of the
Beltway again, do you? I
became libertarian in my thinking about 15 years ago.
When Jason Sorens conceived the “Free State Project” some
years later, it sounded inviting to me.
My husband agreed to look for work in Even
though I feel strongly about a number of aspects of freedom, I had no
idea how to begin. I had
given up on voting and politics years before, but for lack of other
options at the time, decided to renew my membership in the Libertarian
Party, became Vice Chair of my county affiliate and ran for state
representative in 2004. The
entire process of just getting onto the ballot was so bureaucratically
excruciating as to be unbearable. Because
of the thought of spending many more hours of my life engaged in such
horrendous boredom and futility, to say nothing of being part of the
problem, it was a relief to me to realize I had no chance of winning.
I also realize that my actions were misguided and what is
required of me is more personal. While
I have minor children, I am leery of sticking my neck out very far. I’m
beginning to wonder if the Free State Project isn’t just another
futile geographical cure. Its
participants seem to be the “don’t tread on me” type who won’t
limit themselves to running for office, so it could work.
Time will tell. Tom’s
wisdom assures me that in time, I will not regret the past nor wish to
shut the door on it. All my
experiences can be useful medicine, incentive to keep to the road less
traveled, the one of thinking for myself and being responsible for my
own life, liberty and happiness. I would rather not have
made that run for office. It
took me a while to recover. I
wish I could retrieve the hours I wasted on paperwork.
I hope that correspondence from the state elections office will
one day stop hounding me like Harry Potter’s invitations to
Hogwart’s Retta Fontana is an atheist, anarchist, baker, potter, parenting teacher and a student of forex. |