|
Grab Hold of Reality and Take Her for a Spin Exclusive to STR January 8, 2007 “Here’s
your coffee, sir, have nice day. Oh,
and by the way, how many Iraqis did you kill when you were over
there?” “Uh, only a few.
I was on guard duty most of the time.”
“Good job! Now,
does that include women and children, or don’t they really count?”
Death Due to Religion Why
is the American genocide in the Why
is it OK to kill countless people with state sanction, but it is
considered beyond rude for me to ask a soldier just exactly how many
people he has killed? It’s
a simple question. If I’m
paying someone via tax dollars to perform a task, isn’t it appropriate
to ask that person just exactly how well he did the job?
Not here in the land of delusion! It’s
not nice to talk about people dying, especially if we intentionally
killed them. That soldier
might feel uncomfortable if he had to actually say out loud, “I killed
dozens of people.” Or “I
killed hundreds of people.” That’s
the stuff of gruesome headlines, not everyday conversation in middle
class Conversely,
the strangers who have been killed by that soldier feel nothing.
I imagine the families of the killed Iraqis and Afghans feel
something, but again, it’s not nice to talk about this.
If we did, perhaps no one would show up for our next war, and
that just wouldn’t do! I
saw a bumper sticker the other day that read, “My Grandson is serving
in the military.” That
sounds noble, no? Serving is
a word that works well in a restaurant setting.
A “server” approaches you and asks you what you’d like.
If, in place of a lobster bib, he placed a black bag over your
head and attached electrodes to your genitals, or drew a weapon and blew
your head off, that would be more like the “serving” being done in So
whom exactly, is this grandson serving?
According to The Decider, he’s bringing “freedom and
democracy” to the Blessed
are the warmongers I
can’t tell you how many times good Christians have chastised my
children or my friends for swearing.
Recently one threatened to alert the These
good Christians who re-elected The Decider are, sadly, really into war,
despite the Bible’s claim that it is the peacemakers who are blessed
and shall be called Sons of God. What
will the warmongers be called? I
can think of a few names. In
bizarro, mainstream, neocon,
Christian reality, swearing is a terrible, offensive sin, but mass
killing for corporate profit is not only acceptable, it is truly the
work of the Lord! How
does a Christian administration get away with claims that it’s the
Muslims who are violent, love war and kill in the name of religion?
Who’s aggressively, violently, torturously occupying whom?
Is it a minor coincidence that the Decider is Christian and Do
you have to be a minority to qualify for the big “T”?
Because by definition, the American war machine is more
thoroughly terrorist than Iraqis because it targets civilians: many to
die, all others to be subjugated. It
also creates a useful climate of fear here at home.
The Iraqis are simply fighting back--precisely what any
red-blooded American would do given the same circumstances. Muslims
are portrayed as violent, even though it is the modern day Christian
crusaders who assume people are guilty unless proven innocent despite no
representation, no evidence and no oversight.
It’s the Christians who are torturing and killing people.
They call suicides of captive Muslims “strategies” of
prisoners to get back at their captors.
It is the real life “Team How
can the Christian right claim that Muslims want to convert everyone to
worship Allah, yet it’s the self-proclaimed Christians who wants to
bring the salvation of Jesus to the Muslims who managed to survive the
“liberation” of I’m
not personally into systems. They
are created for efficiency, conformity and profitability, which is
useful, admirable and appropriate when used for things.
Systems used on people create suffering rather than love, peace,
prosperity or freedom. The
War on Terror is not an original war.
It is merely the latest operational installment of the machine of
government. It’s like War
6.0. Even though Americans
have no attention span, no knowledge of history and love war movies, if
this Christian jihad were only a film, it would flop at the box office.
It’s been done too many times.
If it weren’t so horrifying, it would be mundane. Death
Is Freedom Too Why
is it considered criminal by many to desecrate the American flag?
Yet at the same time it is perfectly acceptable, in the name of
security, freedom, democracy, whatever hogwash they come up with, to
desecrate that for which it stands?
It’s fine to demolish civil liberties or to destroy human life
if you wear a badge or military insignia.
It’s fine to steal other people’s private property in the
form of taxation, inflation, eminent domain and civil service.
It’s fine to destroy the freedoms of speech and security in
your own person via prosecution of victimless crimes, gun laws, smoking
bans and the drug war, but whatever you do, don’t hurt the flag
which merely represents the idea of freedom! Why
is it OK for federal agents or police officers to kill free people who
do not follow orders from them, but it is not OK for free people to be
prepared to defend themselves with lethal force if necessary in the
presence of criminal malice? At
least, it’s not OK anymore. The
pilgrims lived or died by their own hand, but everything is topsy-turvy
now. Good is bad and right
is wrong, but as long as the masses can get plenty of political pork and
lots of cheap gadgets from Why
is it OK to assume that free people are basically bad and cannot be left
alone to make choices for themselves?
Who does that leave to do the choosing but other, similarly
flawed humans, who just so happen to benefit immensely?
The problem with that arrangement, other than moral repugnance,
is that The Decider is not picking up the tab for his choices, nor is he
the end user, the only true test for efficacy. Why
is it OK for white men and women in suits to get paid a lot of money to
broker away the inalienable rights of free people to the highest bidder,
but it is not OK for people to choose not to participate in the
brokering deal (voting)? At
election time, people kept asking me for whom I was planning to vote.
When I told them I don’t vote, I couldn’t have gotten a more
electrified response if I had said that I just drowned my children.
People around here equate not voting with serial murder, when in
actual practice, the opposite is true.
It’s voting that is inherently violent, and in fact, it kills
people. It is not the
solution. It is the problem. In
Donkeys
think politics is fair play – once every year or two they get to be
the decider! When pressed,
they will admit that no, no one’s vote actually counts, but it would
if it could! In that way, it
kind of counts. “You
should vote anyway.” “Somehow
it’s important.” “Politicians
need to know that we care!” “We’re
making sure they do the right thing.”
(They haven’t yet, and this hasn’t worked yet, but it’s
bound to work one of these days.)
Actually, political donkeys are only making sure they’re in
line for a piece of the pie, a share of the public booty. Other
people become very uncomfortable if you should actually state out loud,
when pressed, that you refuse to vote on principle.
Voting is like religion; technically, the Bill of Rights says
you’re free to worship any way you like or not at all.
This is true with one exception – we must all worship the
god of politics. Freedom
isn’t free in the land of delusion. Government
is the enabler of delusion – through massive theft (taxation and
inflation), they offer goodies to the masses - “free lunches” of
schooling, Social Security, Medicare and “free” prescriptions, to
name a few. They offer the
delusion of safety too, if we all just worship the religion of
omnipotent state. Keep
paying taxes, keep voting, sacrifice your sons and daughters to the
machine and go back to sleep. “Team
Only
government makes mass atrocities possible.
Without a powerful, well funded, fear-based governing system in
place, psychotic plans of mass destruction would never leave the garage,
much less cost millions of people their lives, livelihoods and
liberties. Without government, we could freely exercise our ability to think and live with others in peace. This is why I am an anarchist. This is why I don’t vote. My reasons don’t fit into a sound bite like state propaganda. It is because liberty requires thought and responsibility secured squarely on my own shoulders, not following orders in zombie-like fashion to uphold a psychotic system of mass destruction in the futile hope of a little security, which has never existed at the hand of government. Retta Fontana is an atheist, anarchist, baker, potter, parenting teacher and a student of forex. |