|
Whistleblower's Attack on the Fed
August 30, 2006 The
July, 2006 issue of Whistleblower magazine, a monthly publication of
WorldNetDaily.com, is devoted to educating its readers about “ In
a lead editorial, editor/publisher Joseph Farah describes the Fed as
“a legalized counterfeiting operation -- pure and simple.”
He says further that “rarely in the history of American
journalism has this topic been so fully, factually and courageously
explored” as it has in this 47-page issue of Whistleblower.
In a section called “Voices from the past,” which runs
beneath the articles beginning on page 22, readers are hit with pithy
quotes on money and banking from familiar figures in history.
A personal favorite comes from Sir Josiah Stamp, a former
central banker in Bankers
own the earth. Take it
away from them, but leave them the power to create money and control
credit, and with a flick of a pen they will create enough to buy it
back. One
of Ron Paul’s articles refers readers to Murray Rothbard’s book, What
Has Government Done to Our Money?,
for an explanation of the origin of money as the market’s preferred
commodity for exchanging up through its takeover and gradual
destruction by bankers and politicians.
The July Whistleblower also includes a brief speech Paul
delivered on the House floor in 2002 in which he introduced
legislation to abolish the Fed. He
includes with his bill Lew Rockwell’s article on the benefits of a
genuine gold standard called “Why
Gold?” In
the first of his essays, 1.
How to thwart competition from small banks. 2.
How to create a more “elastic currency.” 3.
How to coordinate the rate of inflation for each of its member
banks. 4.
In the event the whole banking system fails, how to make the
taxpayers pay for the losses. 5.
“How to convince Congress that the scheme was a measure to
protect the public.” As
To
cover the fact that a central bank is merely a cartel which has been
legalized, its proponents had to lay down a thick smoke screen of
technical jargon focusing always on how it would supposedly benefit
commerce, the public and the nation; how it would lower interest
rates, provide funding for needed industrial projects and prevent
panics in the economy. There was not the slightest glimmer that,
underneath it all, was a master plan which was designed from top to
bottom to serve private interests at the expense of the public. This
was, nevertheless, the cold reality, and the more perceptive bankers
were well aware of it. In
his other article, Overall,
this special issue of Whistleblower -- thanks mostly to heavy hitters Why
Milton Friedman? The
July Whistleblower also includes some remarks from Milton Friedman
criticizing Federal Reserve policies of the early Thirties, seemingly
as part of the argument for abolishing the Fed.
Whistleblower editor David Kupelian tells us that 1) according
to the Noble-Prize winning Friedman, who Kupelian openly admires, the
Fed caused the Great Depression, and 2) Fed chairman Ben Bernanke
admitted the Fed’s culpability in a 2002 speech in honor of
Friedman’s 90th birthday. It
sounds like an editorial fit until you examine the details. Kupelian’s
article includes an excerpt from a 2000 PBS interview with Friedman in
which he makes a few comments on the relationship between the Fed and
the Depression. The Fed
had been established to avoid “what actually happened,” according
to Friedman, by which he means the Fed should’ve prevented the
recession following the Crash from turning “into a major
catastrophe.” Yet from
1929 to 1933, the Fed allowed the money supply to shrink by a third,
he points out. In
Friedman’s view, this was the Fed’s great failing because it
triggered bank failures that resulted in heavy losses for millions of
people who trusted the banks to keep their money safe.
The Fed had the knowledge and the power to prevent such a
calamity, but failed to do so. Kupelian
quotes Bernanke as telling Friedman, “You’re right, we [brought on
the Depression]. We’re
very sorry. But thanks to
you, we won’t do it again.” Let’s
clarify Bernanke’s remark. When
he says “thanks to you, we won’t do it again,” he means he’ll
follow Friedman’s general advice and try to destroy the dollar at a
low and steady rate (which he calls “inflation targeting”), but if
the dollar should threaten to recover in value, he’ll bring in the
helicopters and dump money in the laps of preferred investors.
The dollar will thus continue on its course to oblivion, but
most people won’t notice because it could take years to accomplish,
and very importantly, it might postpone an economic collapse. If
the Fed is eager to follow Friedman’s advice, and if Kupelian
believes his advice is correct, why is this presented as consistent
with the views of Paul and Friedman
is a friend of the Fed. Paul
and Or
as Walter
Block
eloquently states: [G]old
is like an insurance policy. Just
as locks, fences and doors are used to preclude losses from theft --
even though they come only at the expense of real resources -- so,
too, does the costly use of gold attain something desirable, namely,
protection from statist monetary depredations. Though
marred by the inconsistent discussion of Friedman’s views, the July
Whistleblower is a gold mine of information about the founding of the
Fed and the intricacies of its counterfeiting process.
Even if you’ve read George F. Smith is writing a novel about a Fed chairman. |