|
A Machiavellian Matrimony
December 14, 2006 Not
for me. Of course, as I close
in on 38, I'm still a bachelor which means no matrimony yet of any kind.
I doubt it's in the cards. Here's
why: If
we analyze the institution of marriage (as all too few do, including a
surprising number of anarchists) as distinct from the intense romantic
emotions which are--or at least, in my view, should be--intrinsic to such
a mutual agreement/arrangement/contract/decision (pick your preference;
it's not my business to do it for you), we find two--and only two, in
truth--characteristics applicable. Religious
faith, and State sanction. I
here carry no brief for any parties who marry based on the first of those
two attributes. As an
agnostic, it would certainly possess no weight in any question I might
have on the subject, but for those of faith it may.
And if such individuals view their wedding as a "covenant
before God" or anything similar, far be it from me to deride them for
that belief. The atheists
among you will undoubtedly equate what I have to say next as no different
than that which I have just addressed, however I have--at least to my own
satisfaction--put paid to that notion in a previous essay, "Anarchism:
Atheism, Agnosticism, Or Faith?"
And so . . . What
we have left is merely a State approval process (as witness, for that
matter, any divorce proceeding). Blood
tests, the purchasing of a "license," and the final State
"seal of approval." How
romantic, how touching. Personally
(and I speak here solely in terms of my own sexual orientation and don't
mean to disparage or exclude others), any woman who would need or want
that kind of an abomination between us as a sign of love and
commitment can skip me as a candidate.
I know that kind of talk is not going to exactly endear me to the
editors of Redbook magazine, or that loathsome buffooness Laura Ingram of Fox
News Radio, but can you argue with the logic?
Surely, as human beings, we are capable of being more elevated than
that, even if Statism continues to permeate the minds and cloud the
judgment of the vast majority of modern societies. No,
I've unfortunately not yet found that hot, sexy, twenty-something
Anarchist bikini-babe who I want to carry home and spend the rest of my
life with. Maybe I'm being
grossly idealistic (though perhaps no more so than being an Anarchist in
the first place). Maybe I'll
meet her tomorrow. I do know
that even if I never do meet her, it won't be for lack of trying, and I've
already had quite a bit of fun along the way.
In fact, I'm planning on having quite a bit more before my time is
up. That much you can take to
the bank. For those of you who are married, I have not meant to offend, insult, or condescend. Merely to do what I hope I so frequently do when I proverbially set pen to paper: that is to get you to think in a new way, or look at something familiar from a different angle. After all, hey, who's your best man? Alex
R. Knight
III
is
the author of numerous horror, science-fiction, and fantasy tales.
He has also written and published poetry; non-fiction articles,
reviews, and essays for a variety of venues; and is former Communications
Director for the Libertarian Party of
|
Exclusive
to STR
