|
An Open Letter to the Red Cross by Glen Allport November 8, 2006 To:
Dr. Jakob Kellenberger, President International
Committee of the Red Cross Cc:
International Red
Cross and Red Crescent Movement Re:
Inspecting
America’s new
domestic detention camps Dear
Dr. Kellenberger, I
am writing in regards the $385 million contract for vast detention
camps announced by Halliburton in a press
release this past January. Major media outlets have had little to say
about this ominous development, but given the American government’s
previous use of such camps to forcibly
imprison over 110,000 Japanese-Americans (the
majority of whom were U.S. citizens) during WWII, the possibility of
such camps being used to illegally imprison Muslims, dissidents, citizens
deemed “enemy
combatants,” and others in the coming months and years cannot be
dismissed. It is also worth recalling the democide
against Native Americans in the 19th Century, the theft of
Native American land, and the herding of survivors into reservations. Given
the potential for abuse, I am wondering if the Red Cross, or any other
organization, has plans to inspect these new detention camps on a regular
basis. For that matter, I wonder if any non-government organization will
even be allowed to know when or if the camps go into operation, or their
locations. My
hope is that by aggressively and publicly pursuing an inspection program
for these camps, organizations like the Red Cross might influence the
federal government to rethink their use. If your organization currently
has no plan to inspect and monitor the camps, I ask you to consider one. It
would be wonderful if, for perhaps the first time in history, people took
note of a possible impending democide or tyranny and prevented it, rather than allowing it to unfold. Bringing
perpetrators to justice afterwards (when that can even be done) is a poor
substitute for prevention of
such epic crime. Your organization may be the deciding factor in
preventing unjust imprisonment (or worse) for thousands of Americans in
their own country. Of
course, the camps may have a more benign purpose. (What, then? Summer
outings for disadvantaged youth?) But
when has a large system of
detention camps ever not been
the start of a nightmare? Here
is what Halliburton’s press release has to say on the topic: “The
contract, which is effective immediately, provides for establishing
temporary detention and processing capabilities to augment existing ICE
Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) Program facilities in the event of
an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid
development of new programs.” That
vague statement is unsettling at best given our government’s recent
pattern of behavior. For example, consider the passage of blatantly
unconstitutional laws including the Patriot
Act and the Military
Commissions Act of 2006, both of which illegally strip Americans of
rights enshrined in the Constitution and in common law (although the
second of those Acts is aimed primarily at non-citizens, Americans
are also jeopardized by the Act directly, as almost
any citizen can be declared an “enemy
combatant” – and then that person has almost no rights at all).
Consider the widely-discussed and illegal use of torture
by the Consider
also the long history of violent American interference in the affairs of
foreign nations, including regime
change by means of invasion or by support for coups against elected
governments; training foreign agents in torture at the infamous School
of the Americas (renamed the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security
Cooperation in 2001); incinerating entire cities full of non-combatants at
Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Tokyo, Dresden,
and other locations in WWII; illegally
using depleted uranium munitions (poisonous
as well as radioactive – with a radioactive half life of 4.5 billion
years) in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Balkans; and otherwise violating or
encouraging the violation of human rights in dozens of nations around the
globe. Our government’s concern for human life may be judged by its
dismissive response to the recent estimate (in a study
published by the respected British medical journal The Lancet) of 655,000
civilian deaths caused by our invasion and occupation of Iraq – a
nation with fewer
than 27,000,000 people, substantially fewer than live in California.
All
of those actions by our federal government cast a Kafkaesque pall over
this new gulag of domestic detention camps. There is little reason to
believe such camps will be run humanely, or even that they will not become
(or are not actually designed to be) death camps for dissenters and others
who the government would rather have disappear.
It
would be foolish to dismiss such concerns out of hand (as even most Jews
did in the early years of the Holocaust,
despite the demented anti-Semitic
vitriol that Hitler published in Mein
Kampf and despite the worsening situation for Jews after
Hitler’s rise to Chancellor several years later, in 1933). It is
understandable that no one wants to believe anything so horrible,
especially when one’s own nation is involved. Even academics in related
fields have trouble facing the reality, frequency, and scale of government
murder. Professor R. J. Rummel, perhaps the world’s foremost authority
on government murder and the author of Death
by Government (Transaction
Publishers, 1994), describes the situation this way: "I think the ignorance of the
incredible murder by government is a moral, intellectual, and academic
scandal. It is the biggest and most significant black hole in our
educational system and literature." [1] Rummel
recently updated his estimate of government murder in the Twentieth
Century – in addition to war
deaths – to two hundred sixty-two
million (262,000,000) victims. That is one hundred and eleven million more
than the total
population of the United States in 1950. It is more than two and a
half million murders per year, during an entire century. For more detail,
Rummel maintains a website
with several thousand pages of documentation on this topic. [2]
Once
again, please recall that the Furthermore,
Is
there any reason we should not
be concerned about the creation of a vast new network of “detention
camps” on American soil? I
realize you are a busy person, but I ask you to take a moment to let me
know what plans your organization has, if any, to monitor this situation
and, if indeed these camps are built and become operational, to inspect
the facilities and report to the public on the treatment of prisoners. Sincerely,
and with much appreciation for the human rights work you have already
done, -
- - - - Notes,
including additional commentary: [1]
Personal communication [2] Other sources of information on democide – as Rummel calls government murder of innocents, by any means and for any reason – include: Death
Tolls for the Man-made Megadeaths of the Twentieth Century The
Holocaust Encyclopedia at (ironically)
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Imperial
Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain's Gulag in Kenya by Caroline
Elkins, Owl Books, 2005. [I’ve
always been fond of the British, so Elkin’s well-written and
staggeringly well-researched book was surprising as well as distressing to
read. The famous British sense of “fair play” was no match for the
corrupting influence of having power over others in The
Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression
by Stéphane Courtois, et. al., The
Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II
by Iris Chang, Penguin Books,
1997. [Chang documents Japanese
torture, rape, and mass murder of unarmed Chinese citizens, with over a
quarter-million killed in a single city in the space of only a few months.
[3]
Sidebar from “US
prison rate soars even higher”, INCARCERATION
RATES US:
726 people per 100,000 Source:
Justice Policy Institute See
also “World
Prison Population List” [PDF] for more detail; 2003 data with, of
course, slightly different numbers. Original material
copyright 2006 by Glen Allport. Permission granted to reprint in
any medium with this message intact. |