|
Crimes of Distance Are Not Crimes by Harry Goslin Exclusive to STR Through
the efforts of a court-martial and an FBI sting operation, the integrity
of the U.S. Air Force will be preserved when a Davis-Monthan NCO is
dishonorably discharged, forfeits his retirement pay and benefits, and
spends up to eight years in prison for his crime.
What did he do? The
airman in question transported cocaine between As
reported in the Arizona Daily Star,
prosecutors said the airman “was a disgrace to the Air Force.”
Captain Joseph Kubler was quoted as saying, “When he used his
uniform to transport drugs, he abused the trust that uniform evokes.”
What
happened to this airman is truly unfortunate, because the military knows
the stupidity and irrationality of Americans can be counted on to
embrace its actions against this individual and others like him with
enthusiasm. What the Uniform
Code of Military Justice says about the crime of drug-trafficking is
irrelevant. Drugs are bad,
and people who use them, sell them, or transport them are bad and should
be punished. If there was
not some infraction defined in the code to get this guy, the military
could have made one up, because Americans are that conditioned to react
predictably to anything having to do with drugs. A
defendant claiming that he was only transporting the drugs to supplement
his low military pay would have received no mercy, either.
The response from the court of public opinion might be, “You
sanctimonious, money-grubbing bastard.
You wear that uniform not for money, but for honor and the
privilege of guaranteeing the freedom of millions of your fellow
Americans. Because of the
men and women who wear and have worn that uniform, all Americans have
free speech, fair trials, protections from unreasonable searches and
seizures, and the right to worship at the Christian church of their
choosing. People like you
tarnish the reputation of the true heroes who serve their country
selflessly and honorably.” Maybe
this airman’s greatest mistake was to commit such a crime here on
American soil. Had he been
wearing civilian clothes while working part-time as a drug trafficker,
it is doubtful that his ultimate penalty would have been that much
different. Perhaps he would
have received less jail time. Recent
revelations about military operations overseas teach us that, had he
engaged in drug trafficking overseas, the level of tolerance accorded
him by the military and the head-up-the-ass American public would have
been virtually limitless. Certainly,
in comparison to other crimes attributable to American military
personnel serving overseas, especially in designated “war zones,”
drug trafficking is trivial. Disturbing
the peace, destruction of private property, breaking and entering,
kidnapping, assault, rape, and murder (so long as it can be covered up)
by American military personnel are all tolerated by the American people
so long as the deluded masses believe these criminal acts are legitimate
acts of self-defense, in the immediate case of the soldiers on the
ground and ultimately, as a response to 911.
You remember, it’s all part of that, “Hey, they started this
fight and we’re gonna finish it,” “Git them thar so’s they
cain’t git us here,” rah-rah bullshit. American
soldiers performing their daily duties in a war zone unavoidably commit
what we would call heinous crimes back home, but also disrupt life in
ways that we would never tolerate (except for those flag-waving patriot
types who, under no circumstances, would never question the oppressive
state they love so much while it was “at war”). Besides
leading to the occasional murder of innocent civilians, The
news informs the occupants of every major city in America that armed
gangs fight each other for turf and control of the local drug trade,
fight the police, and assault and kill innocent people who witness, or
just get in the way of, their illegal activities.
The local police typically know the areas controlled by the
various gangs and their criminal specialties.
Often, the police play gangs off against each other to reduce
gang activity. Yet, to
accomplish this, Americans are not begging local law enforcement to do
to their cities what the American military regularly does to Iraqi
cities when gangs of “terrorists” and “insurgents” are believed
to be holed up there: quarantine and raze to the ground. If
the mayor of LA declared that, due to a dramatic increase in the level
of gang activity, he was ordering the quarantine of specific areas of
the city in anticipation of forceful action by his increasingly
militarized police force to rid the city of these criminals elements,
decent people of all political stripes would rise up at such an unlawful
proposal. In the absence of
a complete police state--as yet unachieved, Americans would never
tolerate the mass destruction and murder here that they have tolerated
in When
the government-controlled media dutifully reports that x-number of
insurgents were killed, the American public swallows the information as
factual. Any news reports to
the contrary that attempt to reveal pictures and accounts of destruction
and civilian casualties are labeled by the military masterminds as
“asymmetrical warfare” being waged against our forces and are
subsequently squashed. Activities
cannot be labeled criminal if there is no evidence to prove them
criminal. When that next big terrorist attack is staged here on American soil, the domestic criminal activity by the U.S. military that is rained down on the American people--to enforce security and make us safer--it will be too late for the American people to do anything to stop the daily violations of their rights as citizens and as human beings. By that time, they will have long sanctified all the actions of the greatest criminal organization to ever curse the earth. And they were once worried about getting a drug-trafficking airman off the streets. discuss this column in the forum Harry Goslin lives in Tucson, loves his family and hates the state.
|