|
Respect, Trust and Society by Mark Davis Exclusive to STR “No
arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear
and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty,
brutish, and short.” ~ Leviathan
by Thomas Hobbes The
above premise is flat wrong. The
state did not create arts, letters, or society.
The state cannot eliminate fear, poverty, loneliness or violence:
it institutionalizes them. The
premise of state worshipers that life is “nasty, brutish and short”
ignores what individuals are capable of when left free.
It is the state that leads to conditions making life unbearable,
not liberty. The state is
based on restricting, controlling and expanding its power.
Society is based on respect and trust for and among individuals. Endeavoring
to increase production and/or decrease labor brings people together with a
harmonious spirit that cannot be forced.
Fellowship and cooperative efforts are rooted in the nature of
mankind. The state is then
created on the premise that it is needed to protect these efforts
previously created by society. Then
the state gradually assumes more and more control of society based on the
premise that control is the only method which it can use to protect
individuals from each other. This
process reveals how the state comes to control society with the blessings
of so many people. The
state is a monster that takes on a life of its own.
How this monster (Leviathan) somehow mitigates the conditions of
life established in their premise is never quite explained by state
worshippers. Of course,
elitists who issue dictates never feel compelled to explain their logic,
as they believe their superiority to be self-evident to the enlightened,
and the unenlightened are irrelevant. In
the end, they believe that force is its own logic. A
person’s word was once the most important factor judged by those seeking
to cooperate with each other. The
act of bonding relationships through common experiences builds first
respect and then trust. Respect
is individual-based and trust is built with growing mutual respect among
neighbors. Trust only exists
when people respect each other. Small
acts of cooperation lead to more opportunities.
People
will seek to earn respect when given a chance.
This is one reason why minimum wage laws undermine the ability of
young people “to start out at the bottom and work their way up.”
Regulations that intervene between individuals building trust are
evidence of how the state restricting liberty weakens society. Respect-worthiness
for individuals is a function of a person’s ability to demonstrate that
they will indeed do what they say they will do.
Or, on the contrary, that they will not do what they say they will
do. There are some people who
maneuver in society with the intent to deceive and others who maintain a
stringent code of honor. The
mode of operation people choose is most often a function of upbringing.
Still, human action is the result of individual choices.
The first step in achieving real respect starts with this
understanding. Just
because everybody does not wish to cooperate on every issue does not mean
that “man in a state of nature” results in “war of every man against
every man.” This is a line
of thinking that obviously leads to establishing a controlling authority
to save us all from each other. That
is ruling elite controlling the masses.
Imagine that. Individuals
choose to say what they say and choose to do what they do.
When these two independent actions are shown to be positively
consistent on a regular basis then a person may be accepted and trusted in
the company of those who have knowledge of these words and actions.
When these individuals are deemed worthy of respect then others can
decide to have faith in their words. If
not, then they have created the conditions for the demise of their
standing within, or even expulsion from, that society.
Trust is crucial in order to form agreements to cooperate and make
contracts. A network of such
agreements and trust building leads to a society.
Central controlling authorities not only cannot create these
conditions, they undermined these conditions. The
uncertainty inherent with the passage of time leads to decision-making
difficulties. These
difficulties can be overcome by faith in one’s ability to build respect
and create trust in a community. Considering
the possibility of future events and deciding how to plan for a better
tomorrow requires respect, trust and faith in yourself as an individual as
well as in your fellow humans. When
the people in a society no longer respect the sovereignty of individuals
to make personal decisions, then that society starts to deteriorate.
People
who do not trust their own abilities and fear their fellow men seek refuge
in forms that appear to provide order based on authoritative force.
Chaos mystifies and frustrates simple minds while the use of force
provides clarity to them. This
is how the elite have been able to gather the support of the enslaved
masses for so long. But this
order is unraveling as it always has and always will. The
circle of life for a society, you could say, starts with chaos, allows for
spontaneous cooperation, builds upon respect for individuals, and develops
networks of trust with the elite seeking a way to institutionalize their
gains culminating in the golden chains of statehood.
Once a society is chained by a state, the respect for individuals
and the mutual trust accumulated in that society begin to die.
Look about and this should be evident as the society we live in
comes full circle. A
person must first understand that we are each alone in order to yearn for
fellowship. An individual must
confront frustration achieving timely success in order to recognize how
cooperation can enhance personal productivity.
Respect-worthiness in modern society is now based on group
affiliation according to the high priests of Big Media (BM) and Big
Government (BG). This statist
agenda undermines what is worthy in society.
The goodwill in a society generated out of a state of chaos is
harnessed by state controllers even as they disrespect the chaos that
birthed the goodwill. Individuals
in today’s politicized society get a free pass to supplant their word
with their group affiliation. When
“officials” are being judged for respect, their group affiliation
takes precedence over their ability to demonstrate competence and
integrity. The old political
saw comes to mind: “That son-of-a-bitch may not be worth a damn, but
he’s our son-of-a-bitch.” The
politicization of our culture has spread this cancer throughout society.
How else could a loser like GWB have so many rabid supporters to
this day? Some
groups seek to marginalize the very idea of individuals by grouping people
together by race, gender, income, wealth, class, education, language, etc.
Political groups use guilt to
enslave more successful groups. Since
the victim-group was formerly exploited, it is believed to justify the
current and future exploitation of all other groups.
Individual respect is thus replaced by group pride as a guiding
principle for cooperation. The
state apparatus is used by these groups to incorporate their gains over
society as a whole and not just the alleged offending group.
The grievances of all victims and the resources of all exploiters
are collectivized into pools. Power
comes from brokering alliances between group leaders.
The spoils of victory are then distributed via group affiliations
by gatekeepers elected from this pool of group leaders.
Your respect-worthiness in a state-dominated society is determined
by your status in the political-group hierarchy.
Recognizing that the sanctity of a person’s word as the
foundation of trust in society has been lost in such a world should come
as no surprise. Melting
away individual identities into the pot of conformity undermines
individual character, initiative and reason.
The Leviathan-state mechanism that turns people into cogs is a
remnant from a time when feudalism provided order and industrialization
was considered the future of humanity.
The bastard child of democratic-socialism spawned from this mating
is now in its last days. Men
are not parts of a great machine that can be driven by a skilled operator.
Modern state-controlled society is a failed dream of idealists who
thought that they could establish respect and trust for all on an equal
basis by way of a monopoly on the use of force as the ultimate righteous
weapon against heathen individualists. The
“self-contained hermit” lifestyle as well as the “we are a sponge
colony totally interconnected to the cores of our beings” lifestyle can
provide a successful coping strategy for individuals when they are left
alone by the state. These
extremes and all of the paths in between have their pitfalls and their
advantages suiting different individuals in different ways.
People who live totally different lifestyles can come to an
agreement on how to peacefully trade what is beneficial to both and to not
intervene into each other’s personal lives.
Harmony can be reached where force is not considered profitable,
much less morally acceptable. People
can trust each other (or not) in spite of, but not because of, central
authorities. The state fosters
conflict between these groups as a means of expanding power over them. Trust
is the best alternative for building relationships and resolving disputes
while resorting to force is the worst.
This statement is laughable to those who cannot see beyond a world
of “might makes right.” Even
though the benefits of a free and peaceful society should be self-evident
when compared to a controlled and violent society, “we” have chosen to
allow society to be ruled by a political system that is based on a
monopoly on the use of force. The
acceptance of this system does not reach the standard of noble being.
Nobility is a choice, not a birthright.
Politeness, dignity and decency are personal lifestyle choices as
are baseness, disrespect, and contempt.
Living a long, beautiful and peaceful life has always been within
the reach of every person. It
depends on individual choices; choices that others can’t make. Only
individuals can think, reason, make choices, forgive, judge, respect and
trust. Political groups are
arbitrary collectives created by demagogues to achieve political agendas.
Electing people to think for you, make choices for you and be the
source of your respect-worthiness in society is acquiescing to the role of
a slave. If you ever want to
stand on your own two feet and be respected as “a man” (read adult
person) in this world, then it starts by doing what you say you will do.
Show that you can do what you promise and judge others by the same
standard, not what group you perceive that they belong to or they may
claim to belong to. When
society was created, “a man’s word is his bond” was the common
standard for initiating cooperation. Judging
the respect-worthiness of others was a way of life; today it is
politically incorrect. Society
was built with respect and trust. The
voluntary and spontaneous nature of this process frustrates idealists who
see their fellow man as universally incompetent and in need of elite
guidance. The state created by
society to protect what trust and respect had previously been built
eventually supplanted free society with state rule while replacing respect
with force and trust with fear. A
man whose word “wasn’t worth a damn” once became an outlaw; now they
run for political office, work for think tanks or become lobbyists.
Some do all three. Respect
for the state leaves no room for respect for individuals.
Trusting the state means that you do not trust yourself or your
neighbors. Accepting the state
monopoly use of force as legitimate for controlling society is accepting
slavery. Accepting democracy
as a justification for this slavery is ignoble and foolish.
The state exists to enslave the masses and elevate elite
“deciders” to positions of authority.
No more and no less despite the fairy tales you have been taught by
BM and BG schools. discuss this column in the forum Mark Davis is a husband, father and real estate analyst/investor enjoying the freedoms we still have in Longwood, Florida. |