|
Lions and Tigers and Bears, Oh My! Exclusive to STR My
Wizard of Oz 2006 cast of characters includes: Lions (suspension
of specie payments); Tigers (central banks); Bears (going off the gold
standard); Munchkins (sheeple); Dorothy (you); Wicked Witch of the West
(Federal Reserve); and the Wizard of Oz (Alan Greenspan). My
contention: The U.S. has not been in recession for almost 200
years. Forget
about the State’s definition of recession; let’s try something much
more relevant, revealing, accurate, truthful, and useful instead: common
sense. The
first definition of recession on Dictionary.com is, “The act of
restoring possession to a former owner.” That’s good enough for me. I
will draw heavily from Murray Rothbard’s book, What
Has Government Done to Our Money? Regarding
Lions, Rothbard writes,
“But it is, of course, essential to any system of private property
that contract obligations be fulfilled. The bluntest way for government
to foster inflation, then, is to grant the banks the special privilege
of refusing to pay their obligations, while yet continuing in their
operation. While everyone else must pay their debts or go bankrupt, the
banks are permitted to refuse redemption of their receipts, at the same
time forcing their own debtors to pay when their loans fall due. The
usual name for this is a ‘suspension of specie payments.’ A more
accurate name would be ‘license for theft;’ for what else can we
call a governmental permission to continue in business without
fulfilling one's contract? “In
the Regarding
Tigers, Rothbard writes,
“Central Banking is now put in the same class with modern plumbing and
good roads: any economy that doesn't have it is called ‘backward,’
‘primitive,’ hopelessly out of the swim. “Central
banks are often nominally owned by private individuals or, as in the “A
Central Bank attains its commanding position from its governmentally
granted monopoly of the note issue. This is often the unsung key
to its power. Invariably, private banks are prohibited from issuing
notes, and the privilege is reserved to the Central Bank. The private
banks can only grant deposits. If their customers ever wish to shift
from deposits to notes, therefore, the banks must go to the Central Bank
to get them. Hence the Central Bank's lofty perch as a ‘bankers'
bank.’ It is a bankers' bank because the bankers are forced to do
business with it.” Regarding
Bears, Rothbard writes,
“In the twentieth century, governments, rather than deflate or limit
their own inflation, have simply ‘gone off the gold standard’ when
confronted with heavy demands for gold. This, of course, insures that
the Central Bank cannot fail, since its notes now become the standard
money. In short, government has finally refused to pay its debts, and
has virtually absolved the banking system from that onerous duty.
Pseudo-receipts to gold were first issued without banking and then, when
the day of reckoning drew near, the bankruptcy was shamelessly completed
by simply eliminating gold redemption. The severance of the various
national currency names (dollar, pound, mark) from gold and silver is
now complete. “At
first, governments refused to admit that this was a permanent measure.
They referred to the ‘suspension of specie payments,’ and it was
always understood that eventually, after the war or other
‘emergency’ had ended, the government would again redeem its
obligations. When the Bank of England went off gold at the end of the
eighteenth century, it continued in this state for twenty years, but
always with the understanding that gold payment would be resumed after
the French wars were ended. “Temporary
‘suspensions,’ however, are primrose paths to outright repudiation.
The gold standard, after all, is no spigot that can be turned on or off
as government whim decrees. Either a gold-receipt is redeemable or it is
not; once redemption is suspended the gold standard is itself a
mockery.” Of
course, none of this happened overnight. The Scarecrow (FDR) took
Americans off the gold standard in 1933 and the Tin Man (Nixon) finished
the job 38 years later. Rothbard
writes, “On This
left the Munchkins totally dependent on the Wizard of Oz for protection
from the Wicked Witch of the West since 1987, but does this make any
sense to you? How could the Wizard of Oz possibly protect the Munchkins
when he was also the Head Witch? Don’t
even get me started about the Cowardly Lion (Congress). Where
does that leave Dorothy? Unlike
in the 1939 film, today’s Land of Oz has no Emerald City, Dorothy’s
companions are not on her side, the Wicked Witch of the West is still
alive and well, and the State’s Yellow Brick Road (fiat currency)
leads only to ruin. Just
like in the film, the Wizard of Oz recently flew away just before the
final scene, displaying no special ability to help Dorothy or anyone
else. At
the end of the film, Dorothy discovered that her ruby slippers (gold)
could take her back to As
shown above, the My
assertion is currently supported by a fiat currency that has been
inflated over 95% since 1913, an $8.2 trillion national debt, a federal
current account deficit of over $700 billion last year, a fiscal 2006
projected budget deficit of $423 billion, at least $40 trillion in
federal unfunded liabilities, and $550+ an ounce gold, despite gold
price suppression by western central banks. That
leaves one group of unsavory characters still unaccounted for: the
Flying Monkeys. In the film, they served the Wicked Witch of the West,
but today they are Internal Revenue Agents, serving the collection
branch of the State using guns and badges. But
no matter who plays the Wizard of Oz, he always booms, “Pay no
attention to the man behind the curtain!” Why? Because every Wizard
knows that the real Got gold? discuss this column in the forum Joe
Blow
is a
privacy advocate with proven subspecialties in strategic planning. |