|
Know This Or Die by Bill Ross It
is a fact that we will all die, the converse of life. It is pointless to
speculate on what comes after life or anything without a factual linkage
to reality. Practical people are concerned solely with what can be seen,
touched, experienced and proven. To concern oneself with speculation
(apart from discovering the possible whys of observable facts) is to waste
one’s time, which is far better spent dealing with reality. What
then, is life? It is an event in time, with a beginning and an end. Since
it exists in the real world, it occupies an environment which places
constraints on what life can and cannot do, dictated by the laws of
physics such as gravity precluding floating. Life also has a compelling
need to survive. Since all human lives are different, what is this
difference and where does it come from? Why do some survive and some do
not? What does science (the art of proving the provable and ignoring the
un-provable) have to say about life? Despite
the appearance of substantial (political/media created) controversy,
Charles Darwin and Evolution (not theory of) is the hands down winner,
forming the basis of all biological science, for the simple reason it is
proven knowledge which explains observed phenomena and has the ability to
predict consequences of experiment. No scientific experiment has ever
produced results which contradicts Evolution. What exactly then, in
layman’s terms, does Evolution claim and why are the political/religious
classes so afraid of it? Charles
Darwin claimed/proved that something as innocuous as a random cosmic ray
is able to cause a genetic mutation which may confer a statistical
survival advantage, allowing a species to be better adapted to its
environment (able to use time and energy more efficiently), which, over
time will lead to major survival advantages for species possessing this
gene/attribute. Life can be explained without a “Creator.” Diversity
is different individuals and species adapted to diverse environments.
Survival “fitness” is how well a species or individual is adapted to
its environment and how well it is able to adapt to changing environment. Thus
far, only organized religion is offended, no big deal, we can tolerate
their dissent, since objective thought will ultimately rule (we hope).
Religion is offended because it is claimed that The
taking of one path over another is a choice. It does not matter that there
is no intelligent chooser (i.e.; random cosmic ray caused a genetic
choice, a path to be taken). In essence, Darwin
proved it is all about CHOICE. This gave the powers that be (PTB’s) a
major insight both into how to rule and what knowledge must be suppressed
at all costs. Mankind must not find out it is all about CHOICE. This is
what intelligence does, it CHOOSES. We must not EVER know this. We must
not be allowed to CHOOSE. We must instead be blindly reacting to contrived
events. Darwin
gave rulers the insight that controlling environment and thus choice is
the road to power. All of history/politics since Those
who claim that natural law is “unfair” completely misrepresent natural
law. Survival of the fittest does not mean “the most powerful.” If it
did, we would all be Romans. The truth is that the fittest are those most
able to adapt to changing environment, choosing to use time, energy, fact,
knowledge and the environment to the best survival advantage. Thus, it is scientifically proven that life and survival is about
the wise usage of time and energy to adapt to environment, and, in the
case of man, this is achieved by using intelligence applied to proven
facts to choose wisely. The PTB’s claim that man is basically evil, conflictual and thus
requires a powerful, morally superior force such as themselves restricting
our choice (which is freedom, which is the ability to survive) for “our
own good.” The truth is the converse, instead, (as proven by Darwin) man’s
choice (and apparent behavioral nature) is determined by the opportunities
presented by environment which is controlled by the PTB’s (faulty
education, corrupt media) as opposed to us, guaranteeing their survival
(since they choose and create our false environments) and not ours (since
we fear them and do not exercise our choice). Bottom line is, all words and intellectual concepts (your environment) have absolutely no meaning unless they have precise definitions, related to proven fact and knowledge. They are rationalizations, intended to confuse by introducing false concepts and relationships. The only thing that is real is when a force is applied in the real world (for whatever rationalization) and meets an equal and opposite reaction (consequence). discuss this column in the forum Bill Ross is an electronic design engineer in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. The above article is an excerpt from www.rossco.org/HumanNature.pdf, an evolving objective study of humanity and civilization and dissection of the lies of those who incorrectly believe they are in control from the factual, provable perspective. Feedback is welcome. |