|
Respecting Authority by Richard Rieben I
have written elsewhere
that the meme that runs the show is authority worship in any
manifestation but the 2,000-year-old lie that fuels the meme is that
freedom is a subset of submission to authority, that we are free only
within the context of the clan, upon the strength (security) of the clan,
by virtue of the clan, and, therefore, through subordination to the clan
(from which all blessings flow). The
authority meme is not directly fueled by anyone's particular
"love" of external authority. This is inherently repugnant to
every human being, upon their very soul and vital spark. Submitting to
external authority has the same warm glow as being raped and sodomized.
The authority meme functions, rather, through a compromise . . . a
"yeah, but . . . ." excuse, argument, rationalization that is
fueled by the premise that we must
have submission to authority in order to have freedom; acknowledging the
contradiction, but living with it on the conviction (of years of
brainwashing) that the kind of freedom that Jesus talked about is
impractical (the guy didn't know what he was talking about), and that
Saul's structure of freedom through subordination to the
clan/state/religion has proven effective (?!) for more than 2,000 years .
. . and a lot of other "factual" rationalizations to the same
effect. I
am going to cite three references to show how liberty works. One is the
free marketplace, which (in a real free market) miraculously supplies
quality goods at cheap prices in abundance and variety to the
amazement and dismay of authority-worshippers. A second is the response of
free human beings to the needs of their fellows in natural disasters,
which is immediate, practical, effective and respectful to the chagrin
and befuddlement of authority-worshippers. The third is Jesus of Nazareth
who lived upon his own authority with submission to no one to the awe
and resentment of authority-worshippers. The
authority-worshippers do not believe that we can "depend" upon
such free actions to achieve these results reliably. They believe that
we must control the market, the situation, and individual human beings.
They believe that submission is critical to all aspects of life . . .
precisely in order to achieve all of those kinds of outcomes which liberty
provides, effortlessly and naturally without any control-over at all. I
cannot imagine why they believe this, except for extreme childhood abuse
of one form or another, resulting in severe damage to their personal
autonomy and perception of others. Historic pedagogy has reinforced this
damage repeatedly, with demented calls for "disciplining" the
untamed child, demanding submission to authority from birth. (Honestly,
many of the 18th Century childrearing books called for beating infants
babies until they were black and blue . . . childrearing practices
that have been, alas, universal.) (For detailed reference, see Alice
Miller, the single most comprehensive pioneer in this field since
1980.) My
point is that freedom without submission to authority is no more a
faith-based principle than what happens in a free marketplace, or a
natural disaster in a free land, or a person who chooses to live at
liberty and "trust" in the universe. None of these consequences
are esoteric Oriental mystiques. They are natural, logical
and inevitable consequences of respect for the sovereign authority of the
individual human being. A
patriarch, fuehrer, comptroller or institution subverts your natural
autonomy and, therewith, subverts the natural order of things in the
universe, requiring endless patches to reestablish a semblance of what
would exist if the sovereign autonomy of the individual were not violated,
but were respected, from birth peace, brotherhood, creativity,
productivity, abundance, joy, love, and vitality; in sum: humanity as it
is at root. You cannot achieve any of these things by submission to
authority; for submission to authority kills each, any and all of these
things across the board, and leaves us to makeshift with artificial
constructions that will never come close to anything human, but only
require further submission, and a chronic lessening of our humanity over
time. (And many more beatings "for our own good," that we may
see the "error of our willful ways.") The
authority meme is across-the-board. It can never achieve or even simulate
anything that is humane . . . it can only lead to misery, suffering,
poverty, war, brutality, and slavery. It is not a "compromise for
freedom." It is, at every minor occurrence, a complete capitulation
to hell. If
the free market fails, or if people abuse victims of natural disasters
instead of helping them, or if "free" people run amok violating
the autonomy of others . . . then somewhere someone has attempted to
control the situation by usurping the sovereign authority of the
individual. This is the only possible source of human disaster,
degeneracy, or destruction. Would
we better off without rulers, without government agencies, without public
education, without corporations, without public (services, housing, banks,
money supply, hospitals, foundations, et. al.)? The answer is a great big:
Duh. I'm
not asking you to think. I am saying that if you resist giving up
submission to authority in any area of your life then, please
for your sake and mine get help. You are damaged. Your humanity has
been violated (and you are continuing to perpetrate the abuse upon
yourself and others). I know it's hard. Most "professional"
therapists available today are government trained/sponsored/vetted and
usually corrupt; religious counselors are deranged at the same critical
point. But try anyway. What
has been lost, most critically, is our own recognition of and respect for
our autonomous sovereignty. It is not merely a question of our political
freedom; this is actually a minor component. In our readiness and
willingness to submit to external authority in exchange for tidbits of
security, protection, rights or comfort, mostly delusory we have lost
our dignity and betrayed our humanity. What's
missing from your life and what the brass rings you chase after
symbolize is respect for authority: Specifically, respect for the
sovereign authority of the individual, starting with your own. discuss this column in the forum Richard Rieben is a world traveler, house remodeler, and sometime author and philosopher. The thesis of his manifesto, Reciprocia, is, briefly: Sovereignty is the base; reciprocity defines how to make it work. Aside from harping incessantly on the theme of liberty, he leads a fairly normal life in middle America, where he scouts for silver-linings. His internet articles are featured at TakeLiberty.com. Comments may be e-mailed to: declarlib [at] yahoo.com. |