|
Save the Trailers! Exclusive to STR “Drag
a hundred dollars through a trailer park and you never know
what you will find” were the words of former President
Bill Clinton’s advisor James (Ragin’ Cajun) Carville,
while defending his boss against accusations made by Paula
Jones. Apparently The
bill would pronounce all mobile homes safe and affordable
and open up the spigot of taxpayer dollars (much more than
Mr. Carville’s imaginary The
bill is rife with the usual goodies, including rent
subsidies paying the difference between lot rents and market
rents. As well as some draconian measures like charging
trailer park owners 10 to 25 percent late fees for failing
to pay into the Florida Mobile Home Relocation Fund ( the
Senator giveth and the Senator taketh away). The
most obvious consequence of passing this legislation is that
it will make life in trailer parks less affordable. Owners
of the trailer parks will pass along their cost of
“contributing” to the Florida Mobile Home Relocation
Fund to their tenants in one form or another. Allotting for
subsidies of rents will also serve to raise rents, making
them much less “affordable” (more expensive), especially
for those who can’t navigate the bureaucratic quagmire in
order to qualify for them. This is already true of the
federally subsidized Section Eight housing program. Further
crippling free market forces by requiring rezoning of land
for mobile home parks will only serve to lessen the choices
of low income dwellers. By forcing land owners to rezone
land (it won’t come cheaply—see the Bert
Harris Act) in order to accommodate trailer parks,
government will drive up prices (rents) for affordable
housing by limiting development, while at the same time
stifling innovation and ultimately making lower income
housing less palatable and safe (see
Cuba).
Taking
Ms. Ross’ suggestion seriously (as hard as that may be)
would mean that rather than the government forcing taxpayers
to pay for relocation of displaced trailer dwellers (a
stupid idea in and of itself), it would force private
concerns to compensate people for land they do not own (just
as stupid of an idea). This would not only be costly for the
developer (a greedy SOB in Ms. Ross’ book) but it would
drive housing prices through the roof, in the end making
livable, affordable housing something you will only read
about in history books. Examples
of the effects of burdensome regulations suggested by the
senator and Ms. Ross on affordable housing exist here in the
discuss this column in the forum Emiliano
Antunez,
41, DDS Degree UCE Dom Rep, semi anarchist, quasi-nihilist,
and a touch of pragmatist,
with a penchant (Midas touch) for business and clueless in politics (campaigned
hard for mayor of Miami and got less than 1% of the vote “the masses
are revolting”).
Formerly on the Board of
Miami
Dade Housing and Finance Authority and currently
serving on the board of the Overtown Community (in)Action Agency. |