|
So Ali, If You're So Smart, Where the Hell Is Your Enclave Already?
So
I have decided to explain this issue directly and publicly and so be
rid of it as I did with that other nagging question1
that was put to me ad nauseum. And explanation is my intended meaning.
I do not mean excuses, alibis, or any of their synonyms. A
deliberate community is formed when a group of people decides to
live among each other in a specific geographic area. A decision to do
so is made voluntarily and with conscious intent. Whether
one calls a deliberate community an enclave,
commune, colony, affinity group, barrio, ghetto, ethnic concentration,
extended family, or any other common or academic name, it does not
change what it is. When
I write about enclaves, people often contact me wanting to know how to
“join up.” This has happened frequently over the past three years.
The problems come later when we meet up. People
misunderstand what my purpose is. I am not planning on setting up a
migration to Costa Rica, or an
island based sea colony, an undersea
colony, a Sealand-type
offshore community, or a moon
colony, or anything else quite so exotic. Those things, while
maybe being technically feasible, would require a huge amount of
capital spending, skill training, and a commitment to a an extreme
sort of lifestyle. So for those reasons alone, I think those listed
above are practically impossible and unlikely to succeed. Here
is what I believe is possible and can work: A group of 100 people,
singles, couples, and family units, could gather together to populate
a selected area or region, preferably one that is unpopulated, or
sparsely so. These
settlers would have to have capital, marketable skills, good health,
and enough commitment to stay the course to build the kind of
community and lifestyle that they desire to have. I see those as the
four core necessities for the concept of enclavism to succeed. Without
those four conditions being met, an enclave definitely won’t
work, as numerous examples throughout both modern and ancient
history have shown. The
problem stems from those conditions as well. Consider Ayn
Rand’s Atlas
Shrugged. In Atlas Shrugged, you have a secret and
well-hidden Gulch
populated by Galt’s
Gulch is the very embodiment of a successful deliberate community. But
is it a realistic or achievable model to base a plan on? I would have
to say no, it is not. In
real life, people like John Galt, Francisco
d'Anconia, Dagny
Taggart, Ragnar
Danneskjöld, and the rest are not especially interested in
dropping out of society to form a secret enclave. Instead, they are
interested in living their very accomplished and successful lives.
That is reality as opposed to a novel’s plot.
After
I quit my last employment situation in 2002, I had to scrape together
every penny I had saved or could borrow to open my business. Then I
had to work 12-16 hour days just to break even. I did this because I
just couldn’t stand working as a wage slave who was making other
people rich. Now when I work hard, the benefits of it go to me. In the
past three years, my situation has steadily improved. In another year
or so, I’ll be making the same income as when I sold agricultural
chemicals. After a few more years, I’ll make more, and hopefully a
lot more. The point is that things are looking up for me. I have
made a life and a livelihood for myself that satisfies me. So
why then should I have any further interest in giving up what I have
and what I could likely get just to “live free”? What I have
learned from my review of history on this matter is that it is usually
the malcontents, cranks, misanthropes, crooks, oddballs and other
misfits who strike out for new territories. What
makes it hard for me to want to pack up and move on to something new,
which may or may not succeed but definitely will
be hard, time-consuming work, is that my life is steadily
improving. The motivator for me to consider enclaving is the rapid
downward direction of societal decay that So
the choice I am faced with is, should I do it so my family and myself
can live free, safe, and secure, or just dig in and try to ride out Leviathan’s
collapse? This is not an easy choice to make. John Galt and the rest
of the Randian ubermensch didn’t have families to raise and provide
for, but I do. People
contemplating making such a commitment have quite a struggle making
it. One need only look at how the Free
State Project has bogged down and now struggles to maintain its
momentum, and all they ask is for you to move to Many
of the people that approach me to include them in my plans are often
unsettled, insecure, very needy, and are in search of a messiah to
lead them to freedom and utopia. The ones with money, skills, and
ability don’t see the need for a separation from this society
because they are usually succeeding in it. The dreamers, the
unfocused, and the uncertain are the ones who are the most So
please forgive me, and grant me your patience, understanding, and
forbearance on this matter. I am fully and even painfully aware of how
short life is, and the necessary ramifications that fact implies. If
you can’t or won’t, then you should consider forming your own
enclave, or joining a group already out there. But you can’t and
shouldn’t blame me for not leading you to freedom, Nirvana,
utopia, or whatever
else you seek. Remember what Brian said in that wonderful movie The
Life of Brian: “You
don't need to follow me. You don't need to follow anybody! You've got
to think for yourselves. You're all individuals!”
I am just a guy. discuss this column in the forum "Chemical" Ali Massoud is a father, political theorist, apostate Muslim, small business owner, college graduate, crack rifle marksman, cat lover, shrewd investor, US Army veteran, and currently single. He lives in Michigan. To see what he means by "Anarchy," go here. If you’re wondering why he is called “Chemical Ali", go here. |