|
Mother Nature vs. Big Brotherism Just
when we libertarians and market-anarchists thought that the fallacy and
folly of government and statism was once and for all clearly exposing
itself for all Americans to see—a hapless military quagmire in Iraq,
numerous reports of Social Security nearing bankruptcy, electronic
voting machines mysteriously favoring one presidential candidate over
another—along comes Mother Nature to show us that, gosh darn it, it
may not be perfect, but perhaps we really do need government after all.
I
mean, just look at the natural disaster that recently befell Indonesia
in the form of an overwhelming earthquake and tsunami that was
responsible for the destruction of millions of dollars’ worth of
property and as of this writing an estimated 105,000 deaths. Why, the
governments of this world and their vast, intricate bureaucratic
networks were right there, Johnny-on-the-spot with their generous
assistance and benevolent charity. Thank God for governments, or else
the rest of the world would surely have callously ignored Indonesia’s tragic plight and turned a blind eye to their suffering. Am I
right? Of
course, I’m perfectly aware that purely voluntary charitable donations
to disaster relief by individuals in the U.S. alone have reached a
cumulative $200
million and counting as of January 4th, with some
organizations such as Doctors Without Borders, Oxfam America, Save the
Children and Catholic Relief Services, among many others, reporting that
they had received anywhere between $10 million and $20 million apiece.
Doctors Without Borders even advised donors to stop
sending in money after receiving more than enough funds to meet
tsunami-related needs. Imagine . . . a charity actually telling people
to cease and desist from pledging any more donations because they say
they have more than enough already. What are those people thinking?
Don’t they know that in the event of such a massive tragedy as this,
there can never be too much charity? What kind of Dickensian,
Scrooge-like characters do they have over there at Doctors Without
Borders, anyway? (Of course, spokeswoman Kris Torgeson encouraged donors
to continue giving money “to meet needs in Southeast Asia and
elsewhere that are not in the immediate spotlight.") Then
while perusing Strike The Root Monday morning, I came across a link to
an interview with former foreign aid worker Michael Maren, and you can
just imagine my shock—utter shock I tell you!—when I read his
first-hand testimony of how the Third World relief and
reconstruction projects of many charities—including the very entities
mentioned in the above paragraph, yea, even Save The Children
(es tu, Save The Children, es tu???)—more often than not
devolve into free-for-all grab-bags for the politically well-connected
while the truly needy are completely shut out and just get needier. But that’s where governments and nation-states come in to save the day, my anti-state friends, which is why I really think I’m starting to see the errors of my anarcho-capitalist ways. How could I have been so blind as to not see how wonderful and generous is the gracious, benevolent Big Hand of Big Government? For
lo, President George W. Bush called
upon his father, the former president George (“Poppy”) Bush, as
well as former president Bill (“Bubba”) Clinton, to go on tour to
exhort their fellow Americans to give even more than the $200
million plus that was already pouring into the coffers of the
international help-the-poor-and-downtrodden-and-afflicted industry.
Perhaps there were some people in this country who had still not yet got
off their fat, lazy duffs to write a check or charge the credit
card—you insensitive, heartless bastards know who you are. Thank
heavens Poppy and Bubba were around to shame you deadbeats into kicking
in your fair share. Furthermore,
you anti-government types might do well to take note of the fact that
waves and waves of U.S. Air Force transport planes had delivered some
430,000 pounds of supplies to the afflicted areas as of the morning of
January 3rd, with 25 U.S.
ships speeding to the rescue. The USS Abraham Lincoln raced
to Now,
having spent a fair amount of time talking and corresponding with you
liberty-loving characters, I think I have a pretty good hunch as to what
you’re going to say to me. Some of you are going to say, “Well Bob,
the food and medicine that the U.S. government is ‘giving’ to those
people isn’t exactly ‘free’ . . . one way or another, we’re
going to have to pay for it—we the taxpayers—how else is Uncle Sam
going to get the $350 million that he’s ‘donating’ while there’s
a total Federal debt of around $7 trillion?” Oh,
sigh . . . you unsophisticated individual freedom types with your
quaint and charming notions of “economic reality” . . . . Don’t you get it??? It doesn’t matter. $350 million, $350 bazillion gazillion googillian . . . you say tomato, I say tomahto . . . who cares? I don’t know if you’ve figured it out yet, but President Bush and the U.S. Congress are monetary wizards--fiscal magicians, if you will. That’s how they’re able to actually “give” us more government services—such as “homeland security,” for example—even as they continue to reduce our tax burden. They just create the money out of thin air. Isn’t that amazing? Golly, those politicians are geniuses! And
don’t forget, the delegation
that Dubya sent to Sri Lanka and Thailand included his brother,
Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, and thank goodness for that because we all know
that good ol’ Jeb has had quite a bit of experience dealing with this
sort of thing in Florida. Of course, I’m sure a lot of you cold-hearted
cynics will be very quick to point out to me the South
Florida Sun-Sentinel’s recent
reports of massive fraud and abuse of Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) funds relating to their relief efforts following the
hurricanes in the Sunshine State last year. Yes, yes, I know, I know . . .
thousands of Miami-Dade County residents who weren’t the least bit
impacted by Hurricane Frances last Labor Day were paid tens of millions of
dollars by FEMA for “damages” caused not by the storm itself, but by
folks throwing rocks through their own windows and hosing down their own
furniture so that they could qualify for the aid. The U.S.
taxpayer ended up paying for new cars, television sets, dental bills,
appliances, spiffy new wardrobes and all sorts of goodies in spite of the
fact that the county medical examiner didn’t report a single
storm-related death. Yada,
yada, yada, blah, blah, blah . . . yes, yes, yes . . .
I know all of that. And I suppose that next you’re going to tell
me that those sorts of things are naturally to be expected when a central
government authority redistributes wealth for the “social good” of
“disaster relief”—inefficiency, waste and abuse are always the
inevitable consequences of such socialist schemes, and for the most part
the intended beneficiaries don’t even get any assistance. And
yes, of course you’re going to remind me of so-called economic
“natural laws” that dictate that whenever government or any other
entity suddenly purchases anything in massive quantities—such as
hundreds of thousands of pounds of such supplies as foodstuffs, medicines,
building materials, etc.—prices of such commodities are naturally bid
up, thus having a much more negative economic impact in the long
run on the very people such relief efforts are intended to help.
Man
. . . You anti-state
people and your stubborn insistence on living in reality . . . . You cold, heartless sons-of-bitches. discuss this column in the forum Robert Kaercher is a stage actor and writer residing in Chicago, Illinois. |