|
Why Plants Don't Have ADD by Bob Wallace When
I was growing up, we didn't have any hyperactive kids.
We certainly didn't have anyone on Ritalin.
We'd never heard of the stuff.
At 11, the only "drug" we knew about was aspirin-in-Coke,
which was supposed to make you drunk.
(We also believed if you put a tooth or nail in Coke overnight,
they would dissolve. Our
experiments proved this to be not true, just as we proved that throwing
salt on a bird's tail didn't paralyze it so you could catch it.) Probably
the main reason we didn't have any ADD and ADHD is because we got plenty
of physical activity. We rode
bikes and later, minibikes. I
rode horses, including one that wouldn't stop galloping while I held on
for my life. We swam, we
wrestled, we had dirt-clod fights, we played football with just a football
and our heads instead of helmets. We
had Styrofoam sailboats break apart from under us in lakes.
We climbed cliffs. We
jumped off cliffs into pools of water.
We inflated tractor-tire inner-tubes and bounced them up and down
in lakes until all seven of us flew off.
I continued to do this even when the other six boys landed on top
of me and shoved me down to the bottom of the lake. We
did this stuff for decades. And
we never had any hyperactive kids. I
don't remember one. Not one.
We did have weird kids who couldn't walk down the hall without
tripping over their own feet, or who would go spastic if someone so much
as gently tossed a ball their way, apparently believing it would go
completely through their torso like a cannonball, but we didn't have
anybody who was hyperactive. Yet,
today, teachers and parents will tell you that ADD and ADHD has become
much more prevalent over the last 15 years.
And during those years, there has been a global decrease in
language and cognitive abilities. The
aforementioned disorders and those decreases are related. Children
who have been diagnosed with ADD and ADHD have different brains than those
without the diagnosis. Among
other things, afflicted kids show decreased activity in frontal lobes and
other subcortical structures, as demonstrated by PET scans and MRIs.
The prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and thalamus
demonstrate both decreased activity and smaller anatomical size,
particularly in the right brain and the left cerebellum. The
main treatment, if you can call it treatment, is with Ritalin, a drug
similar to cocaine. When I
think of the 11 million prescriptions a year written for Ritalin, I am
reminded of the saying, that if a doctor can't cut it, drug it or burn it,
he's clueless. Ritalin
supposedly "wakes up" the frontal lobes, allowing the kid to
concentrate more effectively. My
experience, and that of millions of others, is that lots of drugs, say
booze and marijuana and tobacco, allow you to concentrate more
effectively. It doesn't mean
those drugs are conducive to intellectual achievement.
I doubt Ritalin is, either, and no matter what the drug companies
or the government says, no one knows what the long-term effects of Ritalin
are. I am reminded, however,
that Kurt Cobain was a Ritalin child, which led to heroin and then a
shotgun. As
far as I'm concerned, 11 million prescriptions a year is pure quackery,
and I wouldn't take my ingrown toenail to a doctor who prescribed it, much
less my kid. Boys
are the main recipients of these prescriptions, eight to one over girls.
But why? Current
research is pointing to all of these problems as being right or left brain
disorders. Contra left-wing
feminists, there are distinct differences between male and female brains.
Males are generally right-brain dominant, with a larger right
frontal lobe. Females tend to
be better with left-brain skills, such as language.
Females generally have a greater brain symmetry than males, which
is why if there is an insult to one side of the brain, the other can
compensate. The
majority of ADD and ADHD disorders affect the right brain; therefore males
are more affected. Males are
also more afflicted with left-brain disorders involving language, since
females can compensate for any damage.
In other words, boys get can get hit from both sides. Males,
being more brain-lopsided than females, have brains that are more fragile
and easier to damage. The
upside to that lopsidedness is that it allows men to more narrowly focus
long-term on one thing, which is why, again contra left-wingers, men have
invented almost everything in the world. Now,
as to why there has been such an increase in ADD and ADHD over the past 15
years: It has to do, possibly more than anything else, with lack of
movement. Motoricity--movement--
appears to be the key to appropriate brain development. They are
essentially the same process. Cognitive
and motor functions are one and the same, because they involve the same
parts of the brain. Therefore,
movement, for a baby and child, develops the brain properly.
Anything that moves needs a brain.
It's why plants don't have brains. So,
obviously, the less movement, the less the brain properly develops.
For a child--especially a boy--to spend all his time inside
watching TV or playing video games, does not contribute to healthy brain
development. A sedentary
lifestyle for kids is not a good one.
The brain remains underdeveloped.
And that is scary. Now
I'll be the first to admit I watched a fair amount of TV when I was a kid,
especially cartoons. It didn't
hurt me. I think “Rocky and Bullwinkle” and “Fractured Fairy
Tales” was truly a good thing for me.
But I also got a heck of a lot of physical activity, even if it
involved tumbling down hills after falling off of my bicycle. The
worst offender for improper
brain development is the government--misnamed "public"--school
system. Forcing kids, and
especially boys, to sit for hours a day at the desk, with little movement,
interferes with proper brain development.
Just remember that Ritalin is being forced down kids' throats
because of their behavior in school. Let's
put it this way: People like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Ben
Franklin didn't have formal schooling.
Where are the people like them today? I think there are potential
scholars like them in every generation, but we lose them to the government
schools. The whole system
literally keeps their brains from developing properly.
And the problem is getting worse.
Just look at our plummeting SAT scores. Since
the lack of movement that is inherent in government schools is the
culprit, this means all "reforms" are doomed to failure that
don't involve getting kids, and especially boys, out of the classroom.
Boys are much more affected by lack of motor development than
girls. The
school system cannot be fixed. "Not
paying attention" and "not doing homework" are not the
problems. "No Child Left
Behind" is not the fix. Sitting
for hours in a class is the problem. Private
schools that copy public schools are going to find themselves in the same
quandary. Not
only are school not good for the intellectual development of children, it
also doesn't "socialize" them, one of the main claims of
government school defenders. If your brain remains underdeveloped, you're
sure not going to be socialized
properly, either. "P.E."
isn't the answer. I am
reminded of what Woody Allen added to the saying, "Those that can,
do; those that can't, teach": "Those that can't teach, teach
gym." Being forced to do
leg-lifts and run outside in circles is no one's idea of fun.
When I was in school, the overwhelmingly majority of us wanted
nothing to do with P.E., or P.E. teachers, who we thought were more
Neanderthal than Homo Sapien. Yet,
after school, we get plenty of physical activity. Anything
that improves posture, gait, balance, endurance, timing and
synchronization of muscles will improve cognitive function.
That means play, not
work. And since when are
government schools play? What
passes for "school" these days isn't necessary.
The only one of Laura Ingalls Wilder's books I have read is Farmer
Boy, which is about her
husband's life growing up on his father's farm.
It is a book very much worth reading, and will disabuse anyone of
the notion that formal schooling is necessary. Wilder's
husband, Almanzo Wilder, hated school with a great passion, and probably
attended only a few months. Yet
he grew up literate, and highly intelligent. From
kindergarten to a senior in high school, I cannot remember a thing I
learned. I started to teach
myself to read at four; in the first grade, when we were supposed to learn
to read, I found Dick and Pony and Spot and Jane boring me out of my
skull. Twelve years of
schooling, and I learned basically nothing?
For those 12 years, I mostly day-dreamed, and I still have my
report cards with notations on them informing my parents I wasn't paying
attention. You bet I wasn't.
I was chained to a desk. I
wasn't hyperactive. These
days, I would be diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder.
My fault? I don't think
so. As
far as I'm concerned, that day-dreaming is what saved me, along with all
the swimming and bike-riding and wrestling.
I have no idea what would have happened to me without that ability
to day-dream, or the minibikes and the carnival rides and all the rest of
that dangerous stuff that's supposed to be outlawed in the coming Nerf
World. I'd
never let my kids go anywhere near a government school, not unless I
wanted their brains to be warped permanently for the rest of their lives. discuss this column in the forum Bob Wallace has a degree in Journalism, is a former reporter and editor, and has been published at LewRockwell.com, Sierra Times, and The Libertarian Enterprise. |