|
The Passion of Liberty: Part Six - The Symbol of Liberty by Richard
Rieben “This
‘bringer of glad tidings’ died as he had lived, as he had taught – not
to ‘redeem men’ but to show how one must live . . . . The history of
Christianity, beginning with the death on the cross, is the history of the
misunderstanding, growing cruder with every step, of an original
symbolism . . . . Jesus could not intend anything with his death except to
give publicly the strongest exhibition, the proof of his doctrine .
. . . “His
disciples were far from forgiving this death – which would have
been evangelic in the highest sense . . . . Precisely the most
unevangelical feeling, revenge, came to the fore again. The matter
could not possibly be finished with this death: ‘retribution’ was
needed, ‘judgment’ (and yet, what could possibly be more unevangelical
than ‘retribution,’ ‘punishment,’ ‘sitting in judgment’!) . .
. . “And
from now on an absurd problem emerged: ‘How could God permit
this?’ To this the deranged reason of the small community found an
altogether horribly absurd answer: God gave his son for the remission of
sins, as a sacrifice. In one stroke, it was all over with the
evangel! The trespass sacrifice – in its most revolting, most
barbarous form at that, the sacrifice of the guiltless for the sins
of the guilty! What gruesome paganism! . . . . “Jesus
had abolished the very concept of ‘guilt’ – he had denied any
cleavage between God and man; he lived this unity of God and man as
his ‘glad tidings.’ And not as a prerogative! . . . . “[They]
no longer endured the evangelic conception of everybody’s equal right to
be a child of God, as Jesus had taught: it was their revenge to elevate
Jesus extravagantly, to sever him from themselves – precisely as the
Jews had formerly, out of revenge against their enemies, severed their God
from themselves and elevated him.” [Frederich
Nietzsche, The Antichrist, 1888; original italics] Nietzsche
thus tells of the revenge of the herd. A furious protest by the clan
against the prospect of walking the Path they had been shown. And cloaking
that Path for millennia. Cast off this intricate, vengeful subterfuge and
LOOK at the crucifixion of the Christ. What do your eyes tell you? What
does your heart tell you? Here’s my take: The message is as unmistakable
as it is almost unbearable, but for the enormous love that underscores the
entire event. The
crucifixion should remind people of their own sin of clan or group
indoctrination, their own sin of authority worship, and their own
predilection to perpetrate the same abuse as was suffered by the Christ on
any stray individual whose values, choices and life are contrary to the
authority of their clan. The
crucifixion symbolizes the ever-present capacity for human beings to
gang-up, to conspire and collaborate against individuals, and to abjectly
go along with abuses perpetrated by thugs in their name, making themselves
culpable for the abuse, the same as if they had held the whip. I
have never thought highly of the reproductions of the crucifixion before.
They have always struck me as symbols of group-sanctioned
self-righteousness, hypocrisy and evasion, worn by bigoted collectivists
who would perpetrate the same act again – and worse: do so in the name
of the crucifixion (and the authority of the institutional gang behind
it). Every aspect of the group (the church, the government or any
institutional, authoritative, and empowered body) is an ongoing
reenactment of that symbol. I
am now contemplating buying some crucifixes for myself, to wear, as a
badge of the dishonor of my species, of our capacity to treat one another
disrespectfully, of our cowardice against the authority of gangs, of our
complicit willingness to destroy any person who stands apart from our
group, of our weakness to defend what is good, true or right, of our
failures to respect the inherent humanity of all others, of our readiness
to destroy what we do not understand, of our thoughtless betrayal of
ourselves and our personal sovereignty, and of our compassion for the poor
or other social or economic victims that has no respect in it for their
humanity, their sovereignty and the dignity of their choices. I
will wear this symbol as a reminder to myself, and as a signal to others
that I will not – and that no one should – tolerate such behavior
toward any human being on the basis of any group, of any authority, or of
any religious convictions. I
will wear this badge not in shame, for myself or others, but in honor of
the one man with the courage and dignity to set an example of how to live
and how to die. I will throw the sins of my group programming against this
symbol, this standard, this measure of all things human – and say: No. Against
my humanity, against the humanity of my fellows, and against the patent
lesson of the crucifixion, I will not abide the standards of the group,
though they be governmental, religious or any authoritarian clustering of
cowards, as an excuse to evade my personal responsibility and culpability
for crucifying my fellow men. I will not be tempted by group values,
regardless of any petty material, sensual, protective or ego-validating
rewards that are offered in return for my betrayal of the example of
Christ, of my own sovereignty, or of the sovereignty of my fellows. There
is no reward that can or will compensate such betrayal, or alleviate its
consequences. I
am not a Christian, Jew, Muslim, or Buddhist. The message of the
crucifixion is a warning against all institutions, indoctrinations, and
collaborations in the name of the sovereignty of the volitional will of
the individual to stand apart from any group on any grounds, as such. I
will not answer the twisted theological interpretations of organized
religions, members thereof, or hucksters there-for to evade knowledge of
what this symbols stands for, and their interest, as authoritarian groups,
to advocate, perpetuate and justify the continual persecution and
crucifixion of sovereign individuals in the name of any organization,
institution, authority, doctrine, idol or god. The
symbol presents to us the face of how we, as members of any group, and
upon the authority of a group, will treat one another. We
make a choice upon that pivotal point, to either embrace the whips with
Roman, thug-like glee, or to repudiate the authority of the group to
suborn our humanity, and, upon the value of our own lives, qua sovereign
and accountable individuals, stand upright, apart, and in defense of all
such violations, for “verily, I say unto you, inasmuch as ye did it to
one of the least of my brethren ye did it unto me.” Let
the crucifix be a symbol, then, of our refusal to allow its recurrence, in
any form, to any person, upon any grounds. Let it symbolize respect for
the sovereign boundaries of all persons, bar none. And, finally, let it
stand opposed to any group, institution, or body of authority (including
those of a religious nature) in our refusal to suborn our judgment, our
sovereignty, or our humanity such as to blind us to the daily, ongoing
crucifixions that institutions, authorities and religions perform
continuously in our name and with our support. If
people were to take this symbol seriously, take the Christ seriously, take
the crucifixion and its cause seriously . . . then I’m
sure that the powers-that-be won’t allow this to happen. They’ve
successfully hidden Christ in a closet for nearly 2,000 years. Mel
Gibson let Him out again. If ever there were a window of opportunity for
liberty, now is the time to strike the chains – clearly, cleanly and
irrevocably. “Only
Christian practice, a life such as he lived who died on the
cross, is Christian. Such a life is still possible today, for certain
people even necessary: genuine, original Christianity will be possible at
all times.” [Nietzsche, The Antichrist] discuss this column in the forum Richard Rieben is a world traveler, house remodeler, and sometime author and philosopher. The thesis of his manifesto, Reciprocia, is, briefly: “Sovereignty is the base; reciprocity defines how to make it work.” Aside from harping incessantly on the theme of liberty, he leads a fairly normal life in middle America, where he scouts for silver-linings. His internet articles are featured at TakeLiberty.com. Comments may be e-mailed to: richard [at] reciprocia.com. |