When
the fattened cats at Disney put the kibosh on Michael Moore's new
film, “Fahrenheit 9-11,” they did more than censor an artist.
Gagging Moore is only the latest maneuver in suppressing some most
uncomfortable facts: the Bush Administration's killing off
investigations of Saudi Arabian funding of terror including evidence
involving a few members of the bin Laden family in the USA.
I
know, because, with my investigative team at BBC television and The
Guardian of Britain, I wrote and filmed the original reports on which
Moore's new documentary are based.
On November 11, 2001, just two months after the attack, BBC
Television's Newsnight displayed documents indicating that FBI agents
were held back from investigating two members of the bin Laden family
who were fronting for a "suspected terrorist organization"
out of Falls Church, Virginia - that is, until September 13, 2001.
By that time, these birds had flown.
We further reported that upper level agents in the US government
informed BBC that the Bush Administration had hobbled the
investigation of Pakistan's Khan Laboratories, which ran a flea market
in atomic bomb blueprints. Why were investigators stymied?
Because the money trail led back to the Saudis.
The next day, our Guardian team reported that agents were constrained
in following the money trail from an extraordinary meeting held in
Paris in 1996. There, in the Hotel Monceau Royale, Saudi
billionaires allegedly agreed to fund Al-Qaeda's
"educational" endeavors.
Those stories ran at the top of the nightly news in Britain and
worldwide but not in the USA. Why?
Our news teams picked up several awards including one I particularly
hated getting: a Project Censored Award from California State
University's school of journalism. It's the prize you get
for a very important story that is simply locked out of the American
press.
And that hurts. I'm an American, an L.A. kid sent into
journalistic exile in England.
What's going on here?
Why the heck can't agents follow the money, even when it takes them to
Arabia? Because, as we heard repeatedly from those muzzled
inside the agencies, Saudi money trails lead back to George H.W.
Bush and his very fortunate sons and retainers. We at BBC
reported that too, at the top of the nightly news, everywhere but
America.
Why are Americas media barons afraid to tell this story in the USA?
The BBC and Guardian stories were the ugly little dots connected by a
single theme: oil contamination in American politics and money
poisoning in the blood of our most powerful political family.
And that is news that dare not speak its name.
This is not the first time that Michael Moore attempted to take our
BBC investigative reports past the US media border patrol. In
fact, our joke in the London newsroom is that if we can't get our
story on to American airwaves, we can just slip it to the fat guy in
the chicken suit. Moore could sneak it past the censors as
'entertainment.'
Here's an example of Moore's underground railroad operation to bring
hard news to America: In the Guardian and on BBC TV, I reported that
Florida's then Secretary of State, Katherine Harris, removed tens of
thousands of Black citizens from voter rolls just prior to the 2000
election. Her office used a list of supposed 'felons' - a roster
her office knew was baloney, filled almost exclusively with innocents.
I printed the first installment of that story in the Guardian papers
while Al Gore was still in the race. The Washington Post ran my
story seven months later. By then, it could be read with a chuckle
from the Bush White House.
The Black voter purge story would have never seen the light of day in
the USA, despite its front-page play over the globe, were it not for
Moore opening his book, “Stupid White Men,” with it.
So go ahead, Mr. Mickey Mouse mogul, censor the guy in the baseball
cap, let the movie screens go dark, spread the blindness that is
killing us. Instead, show us fake fly-boys giving the
"Mission Accomplished" thumbs up. It's so much
easier, with the lights off, for the sheiks, who lend their credit
cards to killers, to jack up the price of oil while our politicians
prepare the heist of the next election, this time by computer.
Let's not kid ourselves. Tube news in the USA is now thoroughly
Fox-ified and print, with few exceptions, still kow-tows to the
prevaricating pronouncements of our commander in chief.
Maybe I'm getting too worked up. After all, it's just a movie.
But choking off distribution of Moore's film looks suspiciously like a
hunt and destroy mission on unwanted news, even when that news is
hidden in a comic documentary. Why should the media moguls stop there?
How about an extra large orange suit for Michael for the new Hollywood
wing in Guantanamo?