|
Government Is a Weapon of Mass Destruction “Government
is a tool,” so say most people who favor it. “It has its functions,
and its limitations. It’s not good for everything, but it’s necessary
for some things.” I
think this sums up the way, generally speaking, that most people see the
government. Whether on the left or right, most non-totalitarians believe
that government can do, has done, and currently does great harm, but that
it is absolutely indispensable in doing some things that are so special,
so vital, so fundamental that they absolutely require the active
involvement of the state. Most
people, when pressed, will understand and admit that the key difference
between government and all else in society simply comes down to the
wielding of legalized physical force. They understand, in many cases
intuitively, that their pet projects and ideas for the government –
whether healthcare subsidies, a higher minimum wage, or an expanded war in
the Middle East – boil down to the cop with a gun enforcing
their well-intentioned will onto others. Government
is a monopoly on legal violence and the legal threat of that violence.
Perhaps it’s more accurate to call it a monopoly on aggression. In
theory, ideally, the individual retains the right to self-defense – but
even this the state will often compromise, abrogate, or attempt to banish
completely. Governments, at a minimum, retain the exclusive monopoly on
the initiation of force. If
government is essentially a monopoly on force, and if government is in
fact a tool, what kind of tool is it? It’s
a weapon. More precisely, it’s a weapon in constant use. At
this point, I want to clarify that I have nothing against tools, per
se, or of weapons, per se.
What I object to is their misuse. Tools are essential to civilization and
weapons are essential to self-defense. This is how most people, I would
guess, view tools and weapons. Even those that believe the government
should ban all weapons want the government to use weapons to enforce the
ban. Most people believe in weapons. And
even those who think government does some great things must admit it acts
as a weapon to do them. At a minimum, it acts as a weapon to coercively
obtain money through taxation to fund any given government program.
Usually, government programs also act as weapons to forcibly change the
way people behave and do business. Sometimes, government programs entail
the overt use of many smaller weapons employed together in a large-scale
project, such as in military and police work. Almost
everyone agrees that government causes a lot of damage in some way or
another. Most conservatives believe that it has encouraged bad social and
work habits, overtaxed the working class, dumbed down Americans, and
degraded our culture. Most liberals believe government has overreached in
its law enforcement and has threatened civil liberties. Most people
realize the government has killed an awful lot of innocent people, whether
knowingly or accidentally, overseas. Most
reasonable people would have to agree that government is destructive on a
mass scale – and in fact frequently or even constantly so – and holds
the potential to unleash destruction at even greater levels previously
only imagined. Government
is a weapon of mass destruction. Most
Americans seem to believe the In
fact, almost all governments in the world are quite destructive. The Of
the two-point-something-or-other – sorry, I lost count – trillion
dollars the federal government spends every year, how much do you think
the average American believes is going to good causes in efficient ways? Most
people realize government is wasteful and large. Considering the sizable
portion of the economy that government consumes every year, almost anyone
would agree that government wastes an obscene amount of money – money
taken by force and ultimately used on nothing productive or desirable. That’s
a lot of destruction right there. Even if some people believe that US
weapons of mass destruction and the US government do much more good than
bad just being there, they would probably concede that, yes, government
and WMDs do have very destructive effects. Why
do people trust government – a “tool” that amounts to a weapon
always held over everyone’s head and sometimes lowered to crack some
skulls – to do so much good? Why does almost everyone realize that
government-caused disasters exist everywhere, but assume that – once
“the right people” implement “the right plan” – government
successes are just around the corner? I
don’t have anything against weapons, per
se, but I tend to believe that when 40% of the economy is absorbed
through the violence of taxation and directed by the violent hand of the
state, there’s a bit too much weaponry being brandished and employed,
and a bit too much government destruction of the harmony of the market and
the peaceful interaction of people. The
This
is the thing people want to protect us from sickness, terrorism, crime,
inequality and ignorance? Why does anyone trust it? Because
it pits people against each other in countless ways, making them believe
that the problem isn’t the state: it’s who’s running the state and
what the state is doing. “Those
other people are causing our government to do very damaging things!” so
say most people who favor it. “And they’re stripping away its power to
do good!” Perhaps
the most destructive thing governments do is divide people against each
other, all in competition over the reins of the state, always to lead to a
larger, more active state and yet very little satisfaction on the part of
anyone. And everyone keeps complaining, blaming liberals or conservatives
or libertarians or whomever for the failure of the state to usher in
utopia. And
the government grows – using more force, wielding more weaponry, and
nurturing more destruction. Government
is a weapon of mass destruction, always in use, and when more people see
this I am confident that the calls from far and wide for disarmament will
be too loud to ignore. discuss
this column in the forum Anthony
Gregory
is
a writer and musician living in
Berkeley,
|