|
The Brian Finkel Case The
more I read about this case the more upset I get. It should be taught in
private schools as a required case study of the end result of mixing
humans with the devices of the State: democracy, voting, judicial
tyranny, socialism, special interests, irresponsibility, and victimhood
as a way of life. I haven’t seen a more glaring example of what the
State produces in years. If you are unfamiliar with this case, read on. Carol
Sowers writes in The Arizona Republic, “Brian Finkel, a once-prominent “Finkel,
in a last grasp at leniency, continued to deny the charges Friday,
blaming the accusations and his conviction on what he called his
bluntness and poor bedside manner. ‘I know I'm not Marcus Welby,’ he
said. ‘I'm not a touchy-feely compassionate guy. I wasn't raised that
way. I wasn't trained that way. Perhaps I was too blunt when I counseled
patients on their lifestyle choices, too perfunctory that I didn't seem
compassionate. Perhaps I didn't have the bedside manner . . . they
expected.’ “Judge
Jeffrey Cates of Maricopa County Superior Court was not impressed,
telling Finkel, ‘The jury did not find you guilty because of your
demeanor and manner, but because you committed the crimes.’ The
victims, some of whom were seeing Finkel to terminate pregnancies,
applauded his sentence. They agreed with prosecutors, who said the
doctor betrayed them at a vulnerable time in their lives. “Finkel,
a $600,000-a-year abortion doctor, wore well-cut suits during his
three-month trial. On Friday, he told Cates he was embarrassed to appear
‘in court wearing prison stripes and chains.’ Finkel had originally
been charged with 67 sex counts, but they were pared down to 56 before
and during the trial. He was found not guilty on 34 counts, including
six of the more serious charges of sexual assault. “Seventeen
other supporters wrote letters praising Finkel for his skill as a
surgeon and for battling for women's rights to have abortions. Among
them was Judge Sally Willett of Let
me see if have this right. These women came to him to pay him to
kill their unwanted children for them and now, years later, they
crawled out of the woodwork to ensure that he is imprisoned for
touching them? He did not rape them, beat them, or harm them
physically in any way. By his account he did nothing more than what any
gynecologist does every day. These
women heartily approved of his methods, but not his manners. How
politically correct is that? OJ, Bill Clinton, and Janet Reno are all
still walking the streets, yet this man is headed to prison for the rest
of his life. Why? His bedside manner was not sensitive enough for these
cold-blooded killers who hired a State-approved proxy to terminate the real
“weak and defenseless” victims — their own unborn children. This
doctor was convicted of sexual abuse, which today is whatever any
woman says it is. There is no defense against this charge. If you can
line up enough self-professed “victims” you can convict anyone. Is
he really guilty? Who knows? The
State says he is and that’s all that matters. “Janet Jorgensen of Phoenix, who accused Finkel of
abusing her 15 years ago, told the Republic she was thrilled even though
he was acquitted of some counts, and all counts involving her case came
back not guilty. ‘I think most victims went into this for one thing:
That he never hurt another woman,’ said Jorgenson, who added she bears
no malice toward him. Gee,
do you think that guilt played a part in this case? The vast majority of
these women never even filed a police report. Whose fault was that? If
he really is guilty of sexual abuse, these women are to blame for
allowing it to continue. If he is innocent, they are using him as a
scapegoat to flush away their residual guilt. Someone must now pay, so
it will be him. Then they can all get on with their lives, knowing that
he won’t harm any more “weak and defenseless” women. In
reality, it is the doctor who is defenseless, even if he is
innocent of the charges, as he claims. He legally killed over 30,000
unborn babies, but he is now headed to prison for touching
women inappropriately in the process. Violently killing an unborn
child is a State-approved medical procedure, but woe unto the
State-approved killer who touches a woman inappropriately in the
process, for that is a serious crime. This
case exhibits the classical traits of State involvement in human
affairs: (a) the innocent die needlessly, (b) the real criminals walk,
(c) a politically correct scapegoat is found, (d) the State agents are
paid, (e) the victims are not compensated, (f) the victims and others
are forced to pay for the incarceration of the convicted criminal, (g)
the real crime is overlooked, and (h) justice is not served. The State does society no
favors. discuss this column in the forum Joe
Blow
is the pen name of a freelance writer currently living on the left
coast. Are you a webmaster? Did you enjoy this column? |