Fooling
Around in Laos
Nice
place. Needs money.
by Fred Reed
Vientiane, Laos—
The Mekong flows brown and
ugly past the beer stalls and restaurants across the street from the
Lane Xian hotel, a slightly decomposing pile but comfortable enough.
The country is green, perhaps not hopelessly backward but nearly so,
and rattles with motor scooters. The people are small and brown. When
female, they are often quite pretty. Westerners are not uncommon: A
pretty fair current of backpacking tourists comes through, often en
route to Luang Prabang. Laos is the sort of place writers invariably
call “sleepy,” so I won’t.
It is a backwater, and was
during the years of the war in Vietnam. Today it contains preserved
traces of those receding times, like fossilized tracks of forgotten
dinosaurs.
I met a reasonably
English-speaking young Lao woman in a stall on the river and recruited
her as tour guide. I liked her. She was studying to the extent she
could in a school of business in hopes of getting into hotel work.
Waitressing in a Lao beer chute is a dead end. Our deal was that I’d
pay for the cab on forays into the countryside, correct her English,
and buy lunch. She would be factotum.
During a temple crawl she
mentioned in passing that life had been difficult for her family after
they had lost her father. How had that happened, I asked unwisely. He
died fighting the Americans, she said.
Oh.
Maybe it is better not to go
back to where your wars were. Perspective is corrosive of causes
unless they are very good ones. I’m not sure ours were. Three
decades have passed since we were bombing the Laos. It is hard to
remember why they were a threat to the United States. The Lao
communists won, at least in the sense that they kept the country, and
nothing bad happened to the US. The communists won decisively in Viet
Nam, and nothing bad happened to the United States. They won in
Cambodia, and nothing bad happened to the United States.
I, my guide, and two taxi
drivers were looking at another temple, which Laos has lots of, when I
asked, about the French. They were gone, said one of the drivers with
approval. After them came the Americans, he said, who were also gone,
and then the Russians, who too were gone. They clearly thought that
gone was the proper condition for all of these groups.
I don’t think that Americans
quite grasp that countries don’t like having foreigners bomb them.
We tend to justify our wars in terms of abstractions: We are attacking
to defeat communism, impose democracy, overcome evil or, now, to end
terrorism. The countries being bombed, devastated, and occupied
usually think they are fighting invaders who have no business being
there. The distinction is lost on many. I know aging veterans who to
this day do not understand why the Vietnamese weren’t grateful that
we had come to help them fight communists.
Southeast Asia is full of the
moldering offal of deceased foreign policy. In Siem Reap in Cambodia a
couple of weeks ago I was delighted to find a thriving tourist economy
based on the ruins of Angkor. The schools were full. Hotels went up.
Yet you still see one-legged men. For years, Cambodia’s chief crop
was land mines.
I lost acquaintances to the
Khmer Rouge after the fall of Phnom Penh and tend to be disagreeable
when I think about it. Perhaps I should reflect stoically on the
necessity of breaking eggs to make omelettes. The wisdom of this is
more apparent to those who are not eggs.
In Cambodia the United States,
exercising its god-given right to meddle catastrophically anywhere it
can reach, had destabilized a puzzled country of thatch huts and water
buffalo and facilitated the arrival of Pol Pot. The Americans then
went back to California to surf.
The communists, exercising the
mindless brutality common among them, had then killed huge if
uncertain numbers of people for no reason and wrecked the country.
This showed that the Russians and Americans could cooperate when they
wished. Call it non-peaceful co-extermination. Or call it synergy or
convergence or conservation of parity. The Khmers died.
On the train from Bangkok to
the Thai-Lao border I had shared a compartment with a Lao, perhaps in
his sixties, from a comparatively rich family. He had spent thirty
years in business in Paris. We became casual friends and he invited me
to dinner at his house, where some fifty of his relatives were having
a Buddhist commemoration of something or other. Members of the family
had returned for the event from several countries.
They were hospitable and spoke
I have no idea how many languages among them. The children were well
mannered, the food excellent and accompanied by that traditional Lao
drink, Pepsi. I supposed that they were the enemy, or had been, but
wasn’t sure why. I sometimes think the State Department needs to get
out more and the CIA, less. The notion of devout Buddhist atheistic
communist businessmen scoured around my mental craw but I could never
get a handle on it.
While eating breakfast at the
Lane Xian, I was surprised to hear Spanish. The two fellows at the
next table were Cubans, doubtless in Vientiane because of party
solidarity or something equally as tiresome. I chatted with them
briefly about nothing in particular. They were friendly, having the
notion that the American government hated Cuba but that the American
public did not. To a considerable extent this is true. The analysis is
complicated by the inability of many to distinguish between Cuba and
Castro.
I don’t understand our
embargo of Cuba. When the Russian empire was trying to turn the island
into a military base aimed at the United States, the embargo made
sense. Now it doesn’t. As nearly as I can tell, it continues because
of the petrified vindictiveness of cold warriors without a cold war.
It’s funny: We don’t like Castro because he oppresses his people,
so we maintain a now-pointless embargo that also oppresses them. More
cooperation.
If you get to Laos, the
reclining Buddha a half hour from Vientiane is worth the trip. The
little countries of the region were not always backwaters, or not so
backwaterish anyway. In brief respites from killing each other, which
they did as relentlessly as everyone else, they made some remarkable
things. If you are in the business of building hotels, you might put
one hereabouts. The country could use the money. I can recommend a
young lady to help you manage it..