|
Criminal and Political Minds
Now
check what it is that motivates most political action.
It is to get some goal achieved without having to wait for the
results of a process that is peaceful, non-coercive.
You want higher wages? Get
government to force employers to pay you more.
You want people to stop smoking?
Get the politicians and bureaucrats to ban this practice wherever
they can. You want prices to go up?
Get the state to enact price support measures.
Or you want prices to go down?
Get government into the wage and price control business.
All these measures are symptomatic of the criminal mind – the
conviction that it’s just fine to circumvent civilized conduct by
forcing people to comply with your wishes so you can get what you want. Of
course excuses for this kind of behavior abound.
This is just as true with the conventional criminal community as
it is with the constituency lobbying the politicians who all too
willingly serve up the muscle to them.
“We need to help the poor; the children require it; old people
must have their prescription drugs; farmers, textile and furniture and
other workers must have their jobs protected. Or, again, artists,
scholars and scientists need to be supported since their works are so
vital.” You name it, the
excuse is there. And that is just what criminals tell themselves –
“I needed the money, I had to have the satisfaction I gained; I
couldn’t wait until I had a job; my children needed to be fed.”
It is always something. Such
policies of taking shortcuts to what are often perfectly legitimate
goals if pursued peacefully are of course tempting to most people but
the bulk of us resist them. Parents
are often tempted to strike their children instead of taking a more
patient and cumbersome approach; spouses often yell and scream at each
other, engaging in verbal and psychological abuse, instead of taking a
peaceful tact to resolving their differences.
Nations often go to war instead of the more prudent but lengthy
and arduous approach of diplomacy. Well,
there is, of course, a difference between the violent criminal and those
who turn to government to get what they want – the former do the crime
themselves, thus exposing themselves to the considerable likelihood of
arrest, conviction and punishment, while the latter employ the hired gun
and thus get no direct rebuke from those they violate and hurt.
This gun, the state, then hides behind the concept of sovereign
immunity which makes it impossible for us to sue it for any activity,
however violent and harmful, that has been politically authorized. But
there is, of course, a price to be paid for all the ways individual
rights are violated. When
people circumvent the rights of others, this creates artificial benefits
for them, benefits others do not actually chose to grant.
And this then produces resentment and fear that create massive
efforts at circumventing the state’s edicts.
So, for example, employers who are forced to pay higher wages
than they would choose simply refuse to embark on business ventures
which creates more unemployment than would otherwise have existed.
Farmers who gain subsidies create higher farm prices and drive
people away to feed themselves by alternative means if possible.
Firms and individuals use every conceivable means of avoiding
paying taxes or complying with regulations. The
distortions to the society are legion – it is evident from comparing
the economies of countries where governments intervene more heavily with
those where intervention is less Draconian.
Thus, in Perhaps the best way to grasp the situation is to recall that cliché – a widely recognized but often forgotten truth – that haste makes waste. These shortcuts via government lead to worsening economic conditions, in the end, just as the criminal’s violence lands him in jail, most of the time, and his goal is left unattained. Tibor Machan is a professor of business ethics and Western Civilization at Chapman University in Orange, Calif., and recent co-author of A Primer on Business Ethics (Rowman & Littlefield, 2002). He is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. |