|
Federal
Register Watch by Nick Ebinger October
20 - 24, 2003
The Federal
Register is the official daily publication for Rules, Proposed Rules,
and Notices of Federal agencies and organizations, as well as Executive
Orders and other Presidential Documents.
This column attempts to summarize the highlights (or lowlights)
of the Federal Register during the preceding week. Instructions
for subscribing to the Federal Register can be found at the end of the
column. EXECUTIVE
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT- DESIGNATION OF THE I'm
not sure why the government of the http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-26528.htm
EXECUTIVE
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT- CONTINUATION OF DRUG WAR IN Bush
has declared a continued national emergency (how many there are, and how
rarely they apply to me!) in regard to the drug barons of The
drug war is the best example of the state's opposition to individualism,
as well as its ability to create justifications for its existence.
It creates, by means of its drug policies, a violent drug
marketplace, and then robs the taxpayers and violates their rights in
order to combat it. http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-26631.htm
AGRICULTURAL
MARKETING SERVICE(AMS) - FEDS TO CHARGE PEAR PRODUCERS AN EXTRA 1,240%: Yet
again, the Agricultural Marketing Service has established a monopoly
over the marketing of an agricultural product for no good reason, but at
extra cost. In
this case, the production and marketing of Is
federal regulation so much better for the consumer that it warrants such
an increase? Of course not.
But as polities increase in size, so do their egos, and their
lust for power. http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-26519.htm
CONSUMER
PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION (CPSC) - REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON FURNITURE
FLAMABILITY Several
weeks ago, I
addressed this issue. The
CPSC has been desperate to find some justification for increased
regulatory power over the furniture industry; specifically, here it
seeks to create flammability standards for upholstery. Manufacturers
already largely conform to a useful standard; furthermore, there is no
reason for taxpayers to subsidize the poor choices of those who choose
to fall asleep while smoking on their furniture.
The CPSC cites the bogus concept of "societal costs" to
make a stranger's mistake your problem.
(In the private sector, an insurance company may charge a smoking
homeowner more, and it would almost certainly drop a policyholder who
accidentally set fire to his or her home.
When the state underwrites these risks, it is not the careless
who pay, but all consumers and taxpayers.) As
I showed, the industry has only accepted a modicum of federal regulation
to avoid further state intervention; nonetheless, the CPSC is now
seeking public comments in an effort to justify further regulation.
It won't take much: one or two voices for further state
involvement (from neo-Puritan do-gooders, or perhaps from the
manufacturers of upholstery treatments) will be amplified and drown out
those who oppose more regulation. It's
how government inevitably works. http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-26809.htm
The
CBP (like many agencies, now a part of the Department of Homeland
Security) will be holding a trade symposium to discuss trade and border
protection issues, and how they relate to homeland security. . . that
is, it's holding a taxpayer-subsidized conference to justify its
existence, and why it should violate the rights of the individual.
Political
borders are arbitrary lines created by long-dead politicians and
generals for the purpose of delineating state monopolies.
The CBP is the old Customs bureau (albeit with a Big Brotheresque
name), and its purpose is to patrol these arbitrary boundaries with the
aim of seizing legitimately owned goods, or placing a levy on them,
which is passed on, in the form of higher costs, to the consumer. The
CBP protects borders all right, but it certainly does not protect the
majority of the people inside of them.
Rather, it protects the monopoly of the state and its cash flow.
These borders (as opposed to legitimate property lines) are a
tyranny against the majority, and the officials that use them to protect
their power are 21st-century Redcoats. http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-26946.htm
To
subscribe to the Federal Register Table of Contents LISTSERV electronic
mailing list, go to http://listserv.access.gpo.gov
and select Online mailing list archives, FEDREGTOC-L, Join or leave the
list (or change settings); then follow the instructions. Nick Ebinger
lives in Federal Register Watch Archive Are you a webmaster? Did you enjoy this column? |
||