|
Federal
Register Watch by Nick Ebinger September
22 - 26, 2003
The Federal
Register is the official daily publication for Rules, Proposed Rules,
and Notices of Federal agencies and organizations, as well as Executive
Orders and other Presidential Documents.
This column attempts to summarize the highlights (or lowlights)
of the Federal Register during the preceding week. Instructions
for subscribing to the Federal Register can be found at the end of the
column. OFFICE
OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT (OPM) - NEPOTISM SNEAKS IN THE BACK DOOR Occasionally,
the government will make some effort to appear as if it does not
distribute the spoils of state power to a privileged minority, but the
slightest examination of these feeble attempts invariably reveals them
to be obvious shams. The
OPM, the HR department of the federal government, is amending the law to
allow federal workers to employ their relatives during times of national
emergency. Even fleeting
familiarity with statecraft as practiced by the powers that be in It’s
pathetic how the government resorts to this Chicken Little routine to
justify its existence, and it’s pitiful how many people blindly accept
it. http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-24082.htm
INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE (IRS) – OPEN MEETING OF THE TAXPAYER ADVOCACY PANEL The
Taxpayer Advisory Panel is a commission (actually, a series of
commissions) charged with improving “customer service and
satisfaction” in the IRS. What
a comical, strange, and flat-out inaccurate phrase that is!
First of all, “customer”?
Not at all! A
customer is a person who voluntarily exchanges his or her hard-earned
money for some good or service. Taxpayers
aren’t given this choice. Good
Lord, when you look at what you get for your money from the federal
government for this money, who would?
Try “victim” instead. Next,
“service.” This isn’t
a service any more than getting held up at gunpoint is a service.
Nobody would ever say that the mugger provided a service. Finally,
“satisfaction.” [Pauses
for laughs.] As noted above,
no taxpayer in his or her right mind could be satisfied with what we get
for our tax money. Tax-users,
who benefit from the wealth transfer of government, may be satisfied.
For most of us, however, potholed roads, illiterate youths, ugly
prisons, and war widows simply aren’t worth the money. Why
would I want to pay for C-Span, as well?
I’ve already got Comedy Central. http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-24132.htm In
this proclamation, Bush “remembers
the challenges and heartache endured by the families of prisoners of war
and missing in action.” Really,
Mr. President? I thought
those years were a little hazy for you.
I sure have never heard a proper accounting of your whereabouts
when you went AWOL. The
political establishment gets the http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-24219.htm SEPTEMBER
26, 2003
: DEPARTMENT
OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) – SURPLUS FEDERAL PROPERTY TO
HOUSE HOMELESS Those
generous folks over at HUD have taken it upon themselves to secure
certain federal properties to be used to house the homeless.
It’s easy to be so charitable when it’s not your money!
The
homeless are people who have either chosen to live on the streets or
made enough bad choices in life that they were forced to live there.
Either way, these are not choices that I should be forced to
subsidize. Indeed, there are
no choices I should be forced to subsidize but my very own.
Once the underwriting of people’s choices becomes collectively,
rather than individually, undertaken, which is what occurs in a welfare
state, the value of individual responsibility diminishes.
Individuals then take less responsibility for their actions, and
the threat of crushing poverty no longer exists to dissuade them from
making such bad choices as to leave them utterly without destitute.
In the end, poverty, while by no means attractive, does become
less unattractive, and greater amounts of people behave irresponsibly. So-called
“public” property, controlled by the political elite, is the perfect
final residence for those who have behaved irresponsibly, for public
property inherently fosters a sense of irresponsibility in those in
power. Under democracy,
those who control the government and its possessions have no reason to
utilize them for the long-term good.
Elections come quickly, and you can’t will public property on
to your children (as much as some politicians try!), and so the property
is used for the best short-term good for the politician or bureaucrat
(such as lining one’s pocket, or producing sham “public” benefits
in order to get reelected). And
if the property is so misused that it is destroyed?
Who cares? The
taxpayer can always buy more. http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/03-24262.htm
To
subscribe to the Federal Register Table of Contents LISTSERV electronic
mailing list, go to http://listserv.access.gpo.gov
and select Online mailing list archives, FEDREGTOC-L, Join or leave the
list (or change settings); then follow the instructions. Nick Ebinger
lives in Federal Register Watch Archive Are you a webmaster? Did you enjoy this column? |
||