|
A Tax on the Tiny: Air Bags and Nanny Gadgets by Cat Farmer It's
time to replace my trusty old 1991 Honda, which I have
loved since I bought it to replace the earlier Honda
that preceded it in my affections.
How I've dreaded this day: Now I'm facing a
head-on collision with the issue of airbags, and
assorted other nanny gadgets that may not be optional
whether I buy new or used.
In addition, since I will not buy a vehicle
that is beyond my means, I look forward to federal
scrutiny of an unusually large financial transaction:
Since I refuse to go into socially acceptable debt, I
must be a terrorist with a penchant for used
economical foreign cars, preferably without air bags,
that I can pay for without taking out a loan.
With an ashtray, a manual transmission, plenty
of cargo space, a CD player, sporty handling, and a
sun roof on top, please.
I like seat belts, but not a car that tells me
to wear one--that's what my brain is for.
Responsible
carmakers do not kill their customers; carmakers that
do turn up as road kill on the way to the market.
Unfortunately, carmakers that are forced to
meet government's regulatory standards may; but
carmakers cannot reasonably be held responsible, when
the government made them do it.
If carmakers are primarily accountable to
government, what voice does the hapless consumer have?
Your complaint may be heard in the court of the
car salesman, but your salesman can't sell you the car
you want, and you can't buy it: Your desired car does
not exist, because it's prohibited by law.
Just remember that it's all for your own good
according to bureaucrats who will never drive your
car, never ride in it, and never send flowers if their
good intentions pave your road to . . . wherever.
You're
5'1" and 100 pounds, and sit nine inches away
from the steering wheel?
Your child screams for attention in the back
seat and you'd feel safer driving with her in the
passenger seat, and not having to turn your head
constantly? You
had abdominal surgery or a mastectomy, and the harness
rubs you the wrong way?
Tell that to the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration and if
you're lucky, litigious, and persistent, you might be
able to purchase a car that meets your needs in five
or ten years, assuming you want to make a full time
(class action?) pursuit of buying a car.
It
would be so much nicer (and customer friendly) to
inform yourself on the risks and advantages of the
available options, decide what you want in a car, and
then buy it from someone who is willing and able to
sell it. Try
to find someone who will take the legal risk of
disconnecting your airbags so you can feel safer
driving your own vehicle, realizing that if you turn
around later and sue them for doing what you asked
them to do, the law may come down on your side.
"May the supplier beware, and the wary
buyer left without options?"
Am I old-fashioned to miss "Let the buyer
beware?" If
I had children, perhaps I'd tangle with enough
bureaucracy to get airbags de-activated, but I
probably won't because it's too much paperwork to
shuffle for my own sake.
After all, I'm not a child; I'm a responsible
adult and a careful driver.
At one point, I believed that being an adult
would entail being responsible for my own decisions.
How can I act responsibly when I do not have
choices? It's
easy not to make choices in a "safe"
society; it's hard to feel safe in a society where
choices are up to someone else to make by default.
Small wonder if people clamor for security:
It's impossible to feel safe when you're powerless.
Powerlessness results from an inability to take
responsibility for choices.
So much for safety: please bring back the good
old dangers that I can avoid.
I'm pro-life and pro-choice (my own): what
possible problem could anyone have with that?
Government
holds a monopoly on shell games for social
responsibility. The
'Whodunit' version of "Where's Waldo," at
your public service.
"It's all for your own good, ma'am."
(A
friend calls this "the 'I know you want it,
baby' excuse for coercive behavior."
Right on!)
Never mind the fact that these nanny gadgets
may add $1,000 to the price of a new car; it may cost
several hundred more to get the darn things
disconnected if I can find someone who will do it at
all. I'm
sure a seller who has had their airbags disconnected
will have to have to have them reconnected in order to
legally sell the car to me.
No wonder "doing good" is getting
such a bad reputation!
Please, please, don't do anything to help me .
. . . What's wrong with this legislature? Where did the buck go? Connect the dots, and see if you can figure out where the buck ends up. Tell you one thing; it didn't stop here very long. Maybe I'll start putting up "Missing: Buck" posters all around town. "Green and white; answers to the name of Bill; last seen at the intersection of Bureaucracy and Good Intentions. Bag the reward: bucket seats full of gratitude. Owner is officially strapped."
discuss this column in the forum Cat Farmer is a perennial misfit, autodidact, market anarchist and libertarian activist. She loves cats, music, plants, and country life. She is currently pursuing a career in the financial sector. Her interests include economics, alternative medicine, philosophy, creative writing, and web surfing. Her motto: Too many naked emperors, too little time. Cat Farmer's website is at catfarmer.com. |