|
Rise of the American KGB Richard
Willing writes,
“DNA profiles from
hundreds of thousands of juvenile offenders and adults arrested but
not convicted of crimes could be added to the FBI's national DNA
crime-fighting program under a proposed law moving through Congress.
[Emphasis mine.] “The
law, if enacted, would be the greatest single expansion of the federal
government's power to collect and use DNA since the FBI's national
database was created in 1992. The FBI says its national DNA database
holds genetic profiles from about 1.4 million adults convicted of state
and federal crimes. “The
changes, in a little-noticed section of a bill that would authorize $755
million for DNA testing, were approved by the House of Representatives
on Nov. 5. Backers say the Senate is likely to approve a similar version
by early next year.” Thanks
to this regime’s undeclared War on Terror, it’s a sure bet that this
proposed crime-fighting law will easily pass with little or no debate,
let alone dissent or opposition. As
I wrote almost a year ago,
DNA database networks will soon be the de facto national ID card system.
This proposed law, in addition to PATRIOT I, bodes ill for what remains
of our justice system. It opens a brand new door to abuse by State
agents. If you think that once that door is open, nothing bad will
happen, you are not only naïve and deluded, you are smoking something
that is not sold at 7-Eleven. Unlike fingerprints, DNA material is
easily planted at a crime scene. Once
passed, this law will enable any State agent to arrest you for any
reason, specious or otherwise, just to get DNA material from you. Once
they have it, you can be freed, with all “charges” dropped. When
the State needs a fall guy, all it has to do is plant one of your hairs
at a crime scene. The FBI’s computer will then find the
"criminal" and you will be quickly arrested, charged, tried,
and convicted because, as we all know, DNA matching is virtually 100%
proof positive. PATRIOT
I already enables State
agents to search your home at any time, giving them plenty of
opportunities to gather new DNA material that will then mysteriously
appear at a crime scene. It will not matter who your attorney is, how
much money you make, or what your alibi is, you will be convicted and
sent to prison if/when the State targets you. Local
law enforcement can’t wait to solve many old, unsolved crimes using
the FBI’s growing national DNA database, but the feds are licking
their chops in anticipation of new, pending power to treat everyone —
innocent, uncharged, untried, and unconvicted citizens — as suspects
and guilty criminals, now and in the future. In
the names of fighting crime and national security, a basic
doctrine of the American justice system — presumption of innocence —
is about to disappear forever for citizens arrested and/or targeted by
State agents. There
is no turning back the clock; 9/11 has given the State all the
justification it deems necessary, the technology is readily available,
and Congress stands ready to fund this crime-fighting law today. Who
will stand in its way? Answer: nobody. Ayn Rand was right: “There's
no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the
power to crack down on criminals. When there aren't enough criminals,
one makes them.” "We
are fast approaching the stage in the ultimate inversion: the stage
where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the
citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest
period of human history, the stage of rule by brute force." Timothy
Lynch writes,
“There is, of course, cause for concern. Federal officials have abused
their powers in the past, such as by throwing Japanese-Americans into
detention camps, by conducting barbaric experiments on black men in PATRIOT
I, the pending PATRIOT II,
and this proposed law all mark the rise of the American KGB. John
Pike writes,
“The [Soviet] KGB had a variety of domestic security functions. It was
empowered by law to arrest and investigate individuals for certain types
of political and economic crimes. It was also responsible for
censorship, propaganda, and the protection of state and military
secrets. “In
carrying out its task of ensuring state security, the KGB was empowered
by law to uncover and investigate certain political crimes . . . and the
criminal codes of other republics. “In
carrying out arrests and investigations for these crimes, the KGB was
subject to specific rules . . . . In practice, the [KGB] was
permitted to circumvent the regulations whenever politically expedient. [Emphasis
mine.] “It
is important to note that the KGB frequently enlisted [other State
agencies] to instigate proceedings against political nonconformists on
charges that did not fall under the KGB's purview. Dissidents were often
charged for defaming the Soviet state and violating public order.
Sometimes the KGB arranged to have them charged for ordinary crimes,
such as hooliganism or drug abuse.” Political
opponents, dissenters, non-voters, gun owners, anarchists, militia
members, tax and war protesters, and many writers all present perceived
threats to State agents. As such, they are much easier to control
if they are in prison. From
the State’s perspective, Eric
Lichtbau writes,
“The Federal Bureau of Investigation has collected extensive
information on the tactics, training and organization of antiwar
demonstrators and has advised local law enforcement officials to report
any suspicious activity at protests to its counterterrorism squads,
according to interviews and a confidential bureau memorandum. “The
memorandum, which the bureau sent to local law enforcement agencies last
month in advance of antiwar demonstrations in Washington and San
Francisco, detailed how protesters have sometimes used ‘training
camps’ to rehearse for demonstrations, the Internet to raise money and
gas masks to defend against tear gas. The memorandum analyzed lawful
activities like recruiting demonstrators, as well as illegal activities
like using fake documentation to get into a secured site. “F.B.I.
officials said in interviews that the intelligence-gathering effort was
aimed at identifying anarchists and ‘extremist elements’ plotting
violence, not at monitoring the political speech of law-abiding
protesters. “Civil
rights advocates, relying largely on anecdotal evidence, have complained
for months that federal officials have surreptitiously sought to
suppress the First Amendment rights of antiwar demonstrators. “The
F.B.I. memorandum, however, appears to offer the first corroboration of
a coordinated, nationwide effort to collect intelligence regarding
demonstrations.” Presumption
of innocence is out the door — welcome to the discuss this column in the forum Joe
Blow
is the pen name of a freelance writer currently living on the left
coast. Are you a webmaster? Did you enjoy this column? |