|
Chains of Slavery Political
parties — comprised of incumbents, candidates, voters, agendas,
special interests, and platforms — are the tools that the State uses
to forge the chains of slavery for its citizens. The popular fiction of differences
between political parties also perpetuates the enduring myth that
citizens have only one means of governing themselves — by voting for a
proxy. Not only is this notion patently false, the only real winner in
the game is the State itself. The entire process consists of nothing
more than mass delusion every time an election is held. Political
parties are very useful tools of the State, which is why they exist in
the first place. Political parties can accomplish what the nebulous
State cannot achieve by itself without bloodshed. Primary missions of
political parties include: a.) transferring power from the people to the
State; b.) pandering to special interests; c.) seizing and holding
power; d.) crushing all competition; e.) fostering and maintaining the
illusion that voters are governing themselves; f.) spreading propaganda;
g.) demonizing the perceived political enemy of the day; and h.) lending
some semblance of legitimacy to the State, however imaginary. The
Founders eschewed political parties, fearing the worst, and rightly so. John
F. Bibby writes, “When the founders of the American republic wrote
the U.S. Constitution in 1787, they did not envision a role for
political parties in the governmental order. Indeed, they sought through
various constitutional arrangements such as separation of powers, checks
and balances, and indirect election of the president by an electoral
college to insulate the new republic from political parties and
factions. In spite of the founders’ intentions, the “Many
of America's Founding Fathers hated the thought of political parties,
quarreling ‘factions’ they were sure would be more interested in
contending with each other than in working for the common good. They
wanted individual citizens to vote for individual candidates, without
the interference of organized groups — but this was not to be. “By
the 1790s, different views of the new country's proper course had
already developed, and those who held these opposing views tried to win
support for their cause by banding together . . . . By [1860], parties
were well established as the country's dominant political organizations,
and party allegiance had become an important part of most people's
consciousness. Party loyalty was passed from fathers to sons, and party
activities — including spectacular campaign events, complete with
uniformed marching groups and torchlight parades — were a part of
the social life of many communities.” [Emphasis added.] Does
this sound vaguely familiar? It should because just 60 years later Adolf
Hitler used these same American political party methods to great success. “The
25 points of the NSDAP Program were composed by Adolf Hitler and Anton
Drexler. They were publicly presented on “Hitler
was intent on having a community of mutual interest that desired mutual
success instead of one that was divided over the control of money or
differing values. THE
COMMON INTEREST BEFORE SELF-INTEREST--THAT IS THE SPIRIT OF THE PROGRAM.
BREAKING OF THE THRALDOM OF INTEREST - THAT IS THE KERNEL OF NATIONAL
SOCIALISM. “In
these straightforward statements of intent, Hitler translated his
ideology into a plan of action which would prove its popularity with the
German people throughout the coming years. For many, the abruptness of
its departure from the tradition of politics as practiced in the western
world was as much of a shock as its liberal nature and foresight of the
emerging problems of western democracy.” Of
course, common interest is merely code for special interest
and self-interest must fall to party loyalty. Once that is
achieved it is a short step to swearing loyalty oaths to the party
leader himself. Propaganda
is not only a primary mission of political parties, it is the best means
of achieving the political goals of the party, as Hitler wrote in Mein
Kampf. The NSDAP was largely successful due to the extensive
propaganda machine that it employed. In
1931, Joseph Goebbels wrote in his “Will
and Way” article, “Political methods always presume a political
goal. Only when the goal is crystal clear and unchangeable is it
possible to determine the foundations of practical work. The means one
uses to reach the goal is political will. “There
are a variety of ways to gain power. There are illegal means to gain
power through brute force; one can also gain power legally by winning a
majority in an election. There are revolutions, Putsches, uprisings. But
each of these methods requires a political group to win the sympathies
of the broad masses, if it wishes over the long run to maintain its
power. But the sympathy of the people does not come of itself; it must
be won. “The
means of gaining that support is propaganda . . . . The goal of
propaganda is to make what the theorists have discovered clear to the
broad masses . . . . The great accomplishment of the National Socialist
movement is that it created a synthesis of both elements [will and way]
of the art of politics.” Hitler
was among the least likely of individuals to rise to power when he did.
He was unimposing, a poor student, flat broke, and a failed painter. He
lived like a bum for months on the streets of "Of
what importance is all that, if I range men firmly within a discipline
they cannot escape? Let them own land or factories as much as they
please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the Party,
is supreme over them regardless of whether they are owners or workers.
All that is unessential; our socialism goes far deeper. It establishes a
relationship of the individual to the State, the national community. Why
need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human
beings." [Emphasis added.] Hitler was much smarter
than most Americans are today. He at least understood that the political
party is the tool that the State uses to forge the chains of slavery for
its citizens. discuss this column in the forum Joe
Blow
is the pen name of a freelance writer currently living on the left
coast. Are you a webmaster? Did you enjoy this column? |